Houston clears Planned Parenthood... and indicts prolife activists instead. (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 10:24:02 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Houston clears Planned Parenthood... and indicts prolife activists instead. (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Houston clears Planned Parenthood... and indicts prolife activists instead.  (Read 2677 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: January 25, 2016, 09:08:09 PM »

Hahaha, perfect.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: January 27, 2016, 01:42:13 PM »

This is not about abortion. It's about using deception and fraud to advance your political views. I hope we can all agree that's a bad thing even if you support the views in question.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: January 27, 2016, 02:12:34 PM »

So they were indicted for making a fake drivers license? Keep that in mind, kids!

A second count apparently was an attempt to traffic in body parts, which is ridiculous, and an affirmative defense to a fake ID rap is that there was no intent to defraud, and there clearly was no intent to defraud, just expose, so the indictment seems to be a clear miscarriage of justice, and should be thrown out by the court with some dispatch.

Seriously? Making up fake IDs is not a crime if there's no "intent to defraud" (whatever the hell that means)? Huh
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,171
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2016, 11:14:10 AM »


I thought I had enough pro-woman bona fides on the forum for it to be relatively evident that I didn't approve of the skulduggery.

Sure.

I'm beginning to reconsider presenting myself as transgender/a woman, primarily for religious reasons.

Combining something that's both anti-women (linking gender presentation to religious prerequisites) and an example of personal 'skulduggery' (ex-trans bull) in one then I think you've burned that card.

Nathan.

I really don't want to discuss this here, but if you consider yourself an advocate for transgender rights, then you shouldn't lecture people on what their "true" gender identity is.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.