Who did best at the IA CNN Town Hall?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 05:59:21 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who did best at the IA CNN Town Hall?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Hillary Clinton		  
#2
Martin O'Malley		  
#3
Bernie Sanders		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 51

Author Topic: Who did best at the IA CNN Town Hall?  (Read 1199 times)
Progressive
jro660
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,580


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 25, 2016, 11:05:33 PM »
I think probably Hillary, but O'Malley and Sanders did very well too.
Logged
Asian Nazi
d32123
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,523
China


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 25, 2016, 11:07:46 PM »
I didn't watch it but I'm voting Hillary anyway!
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 25, 2016, 11:08:11 PM »
I thought Sanders and Clinton did very well. I didn't watch O'Malley at all.
Logged
Admiral Kizaru
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 576
Political Matrix
E: -3.61, S: -3.83

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 25, 2016, 11:08:44 PM »
They all did really well but I think Hillary just secured Iowa tonight and ultimately the nomination.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,984


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 25, 2016, 11:08:58 PM »
I think O'Malley was the best.
Logged
Horsemask
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,274


Political Matrix
E: -1.81, S: -4.87

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 25, 2016, 11:09:09 PM »
I was half paying attention but I thought all of them did relatively well. Not sure if it actually changes anything in the primary race though.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2016, 11:09:16 PM »
Sanders > Clinton >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> O'Malley
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2016, 11:10:12 PM »
O'Malley, obv

TBH, Sanders seemed affable in a way that he hasn't when I've seen him before.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2016, 11:10:19 PM »
Not that this town hall matters for anything, but Clinton didn't really have any stand out moments necessary to halt Sanders' momentum. Sanders performed as he usually does, somewhat one policy sided at times but very high energy. O'Malley was there I think.
Logged
Oak Hills
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,076
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2016, 11:13:16 PM »
I think Clinton did very well tonight, very high-energy and very personable. Sanders and O'Malley did alright as well, but I think Clinton clearly performed the best.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2016, 11:16:05 PM »
Sanders was more personable and Clinton was more well versed and then some in every issue that was presented to her. Sanders keeps writing his opponent's attack ads though with his "yes, we will raise taxes!" promise.
Logged
henster
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,984


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2016, 11:17:32 PM »
It helps that Sanders was on during prime time 9-10 while Clinton got the last leg 10:30-11.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,733
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2016, 11:20:48 PM »
Clinton. Closing on Abraham Lincoln was beautiful.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2016, 11:42:55 PM »
Quote from: HagridOfTheDeep on January 25, 2016, 11:20:48 PM
Clinton. Closing on Abraham Lincoln was beautiful.
Agreed.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,901
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2016, 12:02:11 AM »
I want Bernie Sanders leading my political movement, but I want Hillary Clinton running my government. That came through tonight. I think Hillary did well enough to squeak by next Monday.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: January 26, 2016, 12:06:13 AM »
Quote from: Admiral Kizaru on January 25, 2016, 11:08:44 PM
They all did really well but I think Hillary just secured Iowa tonight and ultimately the nomination.

How many people even waited through Martin O' Malley to see her? This won't determine the outcome of anything.
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,149
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: January 26, 2016, 02:40:55 PM »
I think that one of the more interesting questions was the one to O'Malley as to what his supporters should do if they can't get to 15%. Of course, his response, to not back down was predictable. It wasn't like he was going to endorse Clinton or Sanders.
Logged
Kleine Scheiße
PeteHam
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,775
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.16, S: -1.74

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: January 26, 2016, 02:56:43 PM »
Only watched O'Malley. He did fantastic.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 14 queries.