Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 02:05:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Oral, etc.; even for married heterosexual couples
#1
Yes (Arrived in time machine from ~1700)		  
#2
No (21st Century Resident of the Western World)		  
#3
Yes (I just want to troll vote yes)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 94

Author Topic: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?  (Read 2859 times)
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26
« on: January 30, 2016, 07:49:18 AM »
No (normal). But come on, the "It's the current year" argument? Prohibiting non-traditional forms of intercourse by state law was stupid even in 1700...
Logged
DavidB.
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,617
Israel


Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: 4.26
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2016, 12:59:31 PM »
Quote from: kataak on February 02, 2016, 12:02:36 PM
Homosexuals does not exist. So I guess it can't be prohibited.
Huh
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 14 queries.