Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 04:58:21 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Oral, etc.; even for married heterosexual couples
#1
Yes (Arrived in time machine from ~1700)		  
#2
No (21st Century Resident of the Western World)		  
#3
Yes (I just want to troll vote yes)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 94

Author Topic: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?  (Read 2868 times)
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17
« on: February 02, 2016, 01:05:45 AM »
Quote from: DavidB. on January 30, 2016, 07:49:18 AM
No (normal). But come on, the "It's the current year" argument? Prohibiting non-traditional forms of intercourse by state law was stupid even in 1700...

Agreed, the "because it's 2016" argument is low energy. They can't even come up with actual support so they resort to that? Pathetic.

As for the original question no.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.