Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? May 01, 2024, 01:54:47 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)

Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Oral, etc.; even for married heterosexual couples

#1 Yes (Arrived in time machine from ~1700)		17 (18.1%)
#2 No (21st Century Resident of the Western World)		60 (63.8%)
#3 Yes (I just want to troll vote yes)		17 (18.1%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 94

Author

Topic: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited? (Read 2858 times)

NeverAgain
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,659

Re: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?

« on: January 30, 2016, 12:29:27 AM »

Of course. Anything that isn't sodomy should be completely prohibited. The gay agenda must prevail.

Logged

NeverAgain
Junior Chimp

Posts: 5,659

Re: Should non-traditional forms of intercourse be prohibited?

« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2016, 03:50:59 PM »

Quote from: kataak on February 02, 2016, 03:48:53 PM

Quote from: DavidB. on February 02, 2016, 12:59:31 PM

Quote from: kataak on February 02, 2016, 12:02:36 PM

Homosexuals does not exist. So I guess it can't be prohibited.

I never had seen any of them in real life, only some people in the Internet claim that they are homosexual so I can't be sure that they exist. I prefer them not to :/

Actually you have a point. All the gay relationships online are probably faked just to keep up PC culture.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.