Wingnuts come out against vaccine for cancer that kills 230,000 per year
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 02:35:04 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Wingnuts come out against vaccine for cancer that kills 230,000 per year
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Wingnuts come out against vaccine for cancer that kills 230,000 per year  (Read 1226 times)
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,734


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: May 26, 2005, 08:27:21 PM »

Yep, the Family Research Council is opposed to a vaccine that could reduce the rate of cervical cancer by 70%. "Pro-life", my ass.

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/5/26/171514/751
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2005, 08:29:03 PM »

So?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: May 26, 2005, 08:29:39 PM »


So, they aren't really pro-life. They just use it as a political wedge.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: May 26, 2005, 08:33:53 PM »

Then you're not pro-choice unless you support the choice of employers to hire or reject whoever they want.

Should I post an asinine link if some "pro-choice" liberals come out against repealing the Civil Rights Act of 1964?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,905


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: May 26, 2005, 08:37:13 PM »

Then you're not pro-choice unless you support the choice of employers to hire or reject whoever they want.

Should I post an asinine link if some "pro-choice" liberals come out against repealing the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

You might have an argument there, but you don't, because you only care about repealing the act so much because you're racist and want to deny people the choice of using the same public facilities. It has nothing to do with libertarianism.
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: May 26, 2005, 08:38:37 PM »

Enough with these stupid labels, "pro choice" and "pro life."  I'm pro whatever the hell all of my political opinions are, just like everyone else.

thefactor: Philip isn't racist.  I support the choice of employers to hire or reject whoever they want, too, but nobody here has called me a racist (yet).
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: May 26, 2005, 08:39:07 PM »

Enough with these stupid labels, "pro choice" and "pro life."  I'm pro whatever the hell all of my political opinions are, just like everyone else.

thefactor: Philip isn't racist.  I support the choice of employers to hire or reject whoever they want, too, but nobody here has called me a racist (yet).

Racist Tongue
Logged
Ebowed
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,597


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: 2.09

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: May 26, 2005, 08:39:52 PM »

LOL.  I won't count that.  Tongue
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,239


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: May 26, 2005, 09:50:03 PM »

Wow, what a superb job of dishonesty and distortion. Usually it's a nice hint when two quotes are presented and they aren't complete nor are they speaking to the same issue.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: May 26, 2005, 09:54:58 PM »

LOL

"What the hell is wrong with these people. Just because a disease is sexually transmitted it is morally wrong to vaccinate people for it? Out-ing-rageous! Bastards! I hope all their lemmings get cervical cancer. "

I got a kick out of the above.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: May 27, 2005, 12:12:09 AM »

You might have an argument there, but you don't, because you only care about repealing the act so much because you're racist and want to deny people the choice of using the same public facilities. It has nothing to do with libertarianism.

A18 is hardly a racist.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.034 seconds with 12 queries.