Regardless of personal opinion, who do you trust to at least manage governing?

[President Johnson]

Able to govern are all the three Democrats plus Trump, Kasich, Christie, ¿Jeb?, Gilmore, Rubio, Huckabee and . Not sure about Rand and Fiorina, but likely they could to do it. But Rand is more likely than Carly. Cruz, Santorum and Carson are absoltuely not qualified, especially Carson.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

Out of the Dems, Hillary, but I do have some serious concerns due to Benghazi and this email thing. She needs to pay more attention to what the people who work for her are doing.

[ag]

Clinton, O´Mailey, Bush, Rubio, Christie, Kasich.

[pho]

Define "governing".

If you mean someone who wont veto important bipartisan legislation/shut down the government because of petty ideological difference, I think we'll be fine with anyone besides Cruz, Carson, or Paul.

[Kingpoleon]

O'Malleu, Christie, Kasich, Paul, and maybe Jebillary.

[Middle-aged Europe]

Off the top of my hat, the three democrats, Christie, Kasich, Fiorina, Gilmore.

[Zache]

Clinton, O'Malley, Christie, Kaisch, Gilmore, and Jeb.

[MM876]

I mean, there are different ways to drive the country into the ground.

I said Hillary, Trump, Bernie, Christie, Paul, and O'Malley.

I'm very very concerned that Hillary will start a war in Syria, but other then that I think she would keep things stable. Trump is an idiot, but I think the Republicans wouldn't work with him so it'ld be like having a Democrat in office given that Republican legislation might not pass. I think Bernie is the best candidate. Christie is corrupt as hell, but he's a moderate on social issues and not utterly terrifying in other aspects. Paul has a great foreign policy, and I think the Congress would keep from implementing his economic policies, which I disagree with. O'Malley is corrupt, but his energy policy is great, and I don't think he would be bad.

To me, Kasich putting a moritorium on all regulation is him screwing up the country beyond recognition.