REP Iowa (Emerson): Trump 27% Cruz 26% Rubio 22%
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 03:09:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  REP Iowa (Emerson): Trump 27% Cruz 26% Rubio 22%
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: REP Iowa (Emerson): Trump 27% Cruz 26% Rubio 22%  (Read 2831 times)
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 01, 2016, 12:31:23 AM »

Full results and cross-tabs in the morning

https://twitter.com/EmersonPolling
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2016, 12:37:35 AM »

Trump - 27%   
Cruz - 26%   
Rubio - 22%   
Huckabee - 5%
Kasich - 4%      
Bush - 4%   
Paul - 3%   
Carson - 3%   
Christie - 3%   
Fiorina - 2%   
Santorum - 1%

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/emerson-college-polling-society-23639
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2016, 12:43:17 AM »

Huckabee in 4th?!? JUNK POLL!!!!
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2016, 12:44:10 AM »

http://elections.huffingtonpost.com/pollster/polls/emerson-college-polling-society-23639
Change from last poll (week and a half ago)Sad
Trump — 27 (-6)
Cruz — 26 (+3)
Rubio — 22 (+8)
Huckabee — 5 (+3)
Kasich — 4 (+1)
Bush — 4 (-1)
Paul — 3 (No Change)
Christie — 3 (-2)
Carson — 3 (-6)
Fiorina — 2 (No Change)
Santorum — 1 (+1*)
Gilmore — 0 (No Change**)

*Candidate was not included in first poll.
**Candidate was not included in either poll.

As a side note, this is the second pollster to show huge momentum for Rubio in these final few days. I wonder if it's just because they are awful pollsters, or if something is really happening.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2016, 12:47:45 AM »

If Rubio comes in 2nd, I think he might be the likely nominee.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2016, 12:49:51 AM »

If Rubio comes in 2nd, I think he might be the likely nominee.

The problem is he still has to beat the Donald (who so far has made mince meat of every opponent) and he has to do well in New Hampshire, where a bunch of vain people (Christie, Bush, Kasich) are going to smack him in the face in the debates and in ads.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2016, 12:50:31 AM »

If Rubio comes in 2nd, I think he might be the likely nominee.
He'd stand a good shot. But if Rubio wins? I didn't see it as likely, but the two polls tonight make me think it isn't impossible. If Rubio wins Iowa, everyone else needs to drop out so he can win New Hampshire, too.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 01, 2016, 12:52:45 AM »

Rubio getting second is within the realm of possibility, but he'll have a tough time beating Trump in NH, and I can't see him doing well in SC. I still think he's going to get third, though, since he's not the first choice of enough people.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 01, 2016, 12:56:38 AM »

New Poll: Iowa President by Emerson College on 2016-01-31

Summary:
Trump:
27%
Cruz:
26%
Rubio:
22%
Other:
24%
Undecided:
1%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,785


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2016, 12:58:52 AM »
« Edited: February 01, 2016, 01:03:36 AM by realisticidealist »

Emerson's a godawful pollster, but it seems Rubio may have some momentum, though the OpinionSavvy poll is hardly solid evidence. I'd still put a lot more weight on Selzer.

Also, pretty big MoE on this with fewer than 300 responses.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2016, 01:09:28 AM »

I'd be fine with this. Carson at three, and Huckabee and Kasich surges for no apparent reason.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,488
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 01, 2016, 01:12:34 AM »

These results would greatly amuse me but they won't happen.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,735


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 01, 2016, 01:19:13 AM »

Stop trolling, Emerson
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 01, 2016, 01:31:25 AM »

If Rubio comes in 2nd, I think he might be the likely nominee.

The problem is he still has to beat the Donald (who so far has made mince meat of every opponent) and he has to do well in New Hampshire, where a bunch of vain people (Christie, Bush, Kasich) are going to smack him in the face in the debates and in ads.

If the media can rig it to where he gets 2nd in Iowa, I'm sure they can rig it for him to win NH too.

And yeah, the media did rig it. Selzer proved he had NO momentum until every media outlet under the sun started spamming that he did with no evidence. If these junk polls turn out to be true, then we've isolated the sole variable that could be responsible.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 01, 2016, 02:09:08 AM »

Wow, hopefully Rubio can pull this out somehow.

I took a 20€ bet on Rubio just yesterday and would win some 300€ if he does.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,714
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 01, 2016, 03:42:21 AM »

I think Rubio could win. Santorm was also no 3 in the polls four years ago.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,852
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 01, 2016, 03:51:03 AM »

I think Rubio could win. Santorm was also no 3 in the polls four years ago.

Santorum had momentum. Rubio has been static according to all respectable polls.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 01, 2016, 04:44:54 AM »

It has to be said that this reeks of being a case of a nonentity pollster putting out questionable numbers to get itself attention. But who knows.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 01, 2016, 04:50:28 AM »

Just ftr...

Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 01, 2016, 08:53:22 AM »

Let's face it : Rubio has been within 10 pts of Cruz in all of the 8 latest RCP average polls except Gravis, and in the two latest ones he's within 5 of Cruz and Trump. I guess we can safely assume he is indeed picking up support. Seeing how momentum and its media coverage makes nearly everything in US elections these days, and especially primaries and caucuses, and seeing how Cruz is going downhill, I'd say there are now more chances for Rubio to finish 2d than 3d. Trump, however trending down as well, should still be outside of his league for now.
Logged
Türkisblau
H_Wallace
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,401
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 01, 2016, 08:58:56 AM »
« Edited: February 01, 2016, 09:00:46 AM by Türkisblau »

Can't believe this has 18 replies. Are people here really desperate enough that they'll latch onto anything that shows that Trump can lose?
Logged
Zanas
Zanas46
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,947
France


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 01, 2016, 09:05:03 AM »

Can't believe this has 18 replies. Are people here really desperate enough that they'll latch onto anything that shows that Trump can lose?
Actually, I think this poll only shows that Cruz may lose, and be replaced as anti-Trump frontrunner by Rubio. I still think these figures end in a Trump win in Iowa. If Rubio overcomes Cruz in Iowa, where evangelicals are a numerous demographic, he should trounce him in NH next week, where they are already basically tied, and evangelicals are much scarcer.
Logged
Türkisblau
H_Wallace
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,401
Ireland, Republic of


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 01, 2016, 09:11:11 AM »

Can't believe this has 18 replies. Are people here really desperate enough that they'll latch onto anything that shows that Trump can lose?
Actually, I think this poll only shows that Cruz may lose, and be replaced as anti-Trump frontrunner by Rubio. I still think these figures end in a Trump win in Iowa. If Rubio overcomes Cruz in Iowa, where evangelicals are a numerous demographic, he should trounce him in NH next week, where they are already basically tied, and evangelicals are much scarcer.

First off, the polls shows nothing because Emerson is pure, unadulterated junk. Trump has consistently led Cruz by 4+ over the past week or two, and a MOE poll would pretty clearly show it tightened significantly and that Cruz has a good chance to win which is why Emerson released these numbers. It's bait; they want more clicks.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,076
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -3.48, S: -4.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 01, 2016, 10:33:33 AM »

Can't believe this has 18 replies. Are people here really desperate enough that they'll latch onto anything that shows that Trump can lose?

It's better than nothing honey.
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 01, 2016, 10:46:45 AM »

You guys act like it actually matters whether the polls showing Rubio with momentum have any credibility. The original poll showing Santorum's momentum was most likely junk, until its findings became a self-fulfilling prophecy.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 13 queries.