Democratic Iowa Caucus results thread (entrance poll @8pm ET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 26, 2024, 12:57:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Iowa Caucus results thread (entrance poll @8pm ET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 39
Author Topic: Democratic Iowa Caucus results thread (entrance poll @8pm ET)  (Read 60235 times)
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #300 on: February 01, 2016, 10:10:28 PM »

Uncommitted secures 1 delegate. http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2016/by_state/IA_Page_0201.html?SITE=AP&SECTION=POLITICS
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,850
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #301 on: February 01, 2016, 10:10:46 PM »

Wow, I didn't expect such a photo finish! Even if Hillary pulls this out (my gut says she just squeaks by), it's hard to call this a bad result for the Bern.

Actually it is very bad for Bernie. Iowa is his third most friendly demographic state so if he can't win there he has little chance winning anywhere else outside of Vermont/N.H.

That's an exaggeration, but even so, he overperformed expectations, and did what people until recently thought was unthinkable: He pulled even with Hillary.

Nope, according to Nate Silver only Vermont and New Hampshire are more demographically friendly to Sanders than Iowa.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #302 on: February 01, 2016, 10:12:41 PM »
« Edited: February 01, 2016, 10:19:51 PM by Sorenroy »

Big numbers have just come in (not sure from where). With 77% reporting, the margin has shrunk to 1.351%.

Edit: With 78% in it has shrunk to a 1.24 lead. First time Sanders actually hits 49% (unrounded) and Clinton down below 51% rounded.

Edit Two: With 81% in it has shrunk to a 1.188 lead.
Logged
RJEvans
MasterRegal
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 496
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #303 on: February 01, 2016, 10:12:49 PM »

Wow, I didn't expect such a photo finish! Even if Hillary pulls this out (my gut says she just squeaks by), it's hard to call this a bad result for the Bern.

Actually it is very bad for Bernie. Iowa is his third most friendly demographic state so if he can't win there he has little chance winning anywhere else outside of Vermont/N.H.

The thing is this is close enough for the media to spin this as a "ZOMG Sanders almost won he's gaining on Clinton she's collapsing!!!111!!"

I agree, the media will spin this as Berniementum and Clinton is in trouble. Couple this with his 10-point+ win in NH and this race becomes very competitive going into NV and maybe even SC and super Tuesday.
Logged
Asian Nazi
d32123
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,523
China


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #304 on: February 01, 2016, 10:14:12 PM »

The thing is this is close enough for the media to spin this as a "ZOMG Sanders almost won he's gaining on Clinton she's collapsing!!!111!!"

Well duh the media wants a contest.  Whether he actually manages to catch her in Iowa or not, he's done well enough where it'll seem like a two-way race until Super Tuesday.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #305 on: February 01, 2016, 10:14:18 PM »

Des Moines Precinct 70 was tied, 61-61, and was decided by a coin flip. Went for Hillary. Every vote matters!
Logged
exopolitician
MATCHU[D]
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,892
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.03, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #306 on: February 01, 2016, 10:14:24 PM »

Considering she was leading by over 20 points at the beginning, the outcome being almost tied is a pretty big deal.
Logged
jaichind
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,525
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.03, S: -5.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #307 on: February 01, 2016, 10:15:00 PM »

One way or another what Sanders did tonight is to make himself a viable alternative to be the nominee in case something happens to Clinton, say on the email front.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #308 on: February 01, 2016, 10:15:14 PM »

Des Moines Precinct 70 was tied, 61-61, and was decided by a coin flip. Went for Hillary. Every vote matters!

biased coin
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,486
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #309 on: February 01, 2016, 10:16:07 PM »

MSNBC seems high on Bernie's chances. Idk.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #310 on: February 01, 2016, 10:16:30 PM »

Des Moines Precinct 70 was tied, 61-61, and was decided by a coin flip. Went for Hillary. Every vote matters!

biased coin

That coin was a filthy Wall Street billionayuh oligarchy lover.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #311 on: February 01, 2016, 10:17:22 PM »

Clinton lead down to 1.0%.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,463


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #312 on: February 01, 2016, 10:17:39 PM »

Hillary's lead is down to 12.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #313 on: February 01, 2016, 10:18:01 PM »


ughhhh
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,094
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #314 on: February 01, 2016, 10:18:10 PM »

Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #315 on: February 01, 2016, 10:18:36 PM »

20% of the precincts left for Bernie to gain .5% of the vote.

So close...
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #316 on: February 01, 2016, 10:19:21 PM »

20% of the precincts left for Bernie to gain .5% of the vote.

So close...

For what it's worth, Sanders is leading in most of the big counties other than Polk.
Logged
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #317 on: February 01, 2016, 10:19:28 PM »


Probably a lone bitter O'Malley fan lol.
Logged
Illiniwek
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,920
Vatican City State



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #318 on: February 01, 2016, 10:19:45 PM »

20% of the precincts left for Bernie to gain .5% of the vote.

So close...

It's going to happen.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #319 on: February 01, 2016, 10:21:16 PM »

Wow, I didn't expect such a photo finish! Even if Hillary pulls this out (my gut says she just squeaks by), it's hard to call this a bad result for the Bern.

Actually it is very bad for Bernie. Iowa is his third most friendly demographic state so if he can't win there he has little chance winning anywhere else outside of Vermont/N.H.

That's an exaggeration, but even so, he overperformed expectations, and did what people until recently thought was unthinkable: He pulled even with Hillary.

Nope, according to Nate Silver only Vermont and New Hampshire are more demographically friendly to Sanders than Iowa.

I didn't realize Nate Silver was always right, but whatever. The point is that the narrative will likely change after tonight. Clinton was supposed to be invulnerable, and while she's still definitely the favorite going ahead, very few people will act as if Sanders has no chance at all.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #320 on: February 01, 2016, 10:21:22 PM »

Is Bernie willing the popular (non-delegate) vote? It was commonly believed that Sanders would be concentrated in cities which would lead to this happening, but I'm not seeing much of an urban-rural split here.
Logged
Sorenroy
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,701
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -5.91

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #321 on: February 01, 2016, 10:21:36 PM »
« Edited: February 01, 2016, 10:35:39 PM by Sorenroy »

Clinton's lead is down to less than 1% (0.984%) with 18% left to report.

Edit: 15% left to report, lead down to 0.768%.
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #322 on: February 01, 2016, 10:21:39 PM »

Sanders .9% behind Hillary now...
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #323 on: February 01, 2016, 10:21:47 PM »

You do not win by losing. Sanders needed to win Iowa, period. Clinton can go out there, fund raise and campaign based on winning the first state of primary cycle, which is good for momentum. Sanders will likely win New Hampshire, but that might be in peril now that Clinton can shift resources there. A lot of Clinton's resources shifted to Iowa, but now that it is over she can shift resources into New Hampshire.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #324 on: February 01, 2016, 10:22:16 PM »

Is Bernie willing the popular (non-delegate) vote? It was commonly believed that Sanders would be concentrated in cities which would lead to this happening, but I'm not seeing much of an urban-rural split here.

No raw vote is released.

Clinton has 11 more state delegates at this point.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 [13] 14 15 16 17 18 ... 39  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.