Does anyone find the early 1900s (1900-1912/1914) in America quaint?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 10:01:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Does anyone find the early 1900s (1900-1912/1914) in America quaint?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Does anyone find the early 1900s (1900-1912/1914) in America quaint?  (Read 1212 times)
Theodore Roosevelt
Lyndon B. Johnson
Newbie
*
Posts: 3


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 01, 2016, 11:28:05 PM »

Whether you choose to end the period at 1912, when the Titanic sunk, or 1914, when WWII broke out, the early 1900s in this country seems a really quaint and lovely time in some ways. So much progress happening so rapidly, while this country wasn't yet the world leader it would become. A pretty good succession of Presidents in those years, from TR through Taft, ending roughly in the first year of Wilson's Presidency. Not only politically, but you had ragtime and the first stirrings of Jazz, and the fashion was pretty quaint as well. A calm before the end of worldly innocence with the guns of August.
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,763


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2016, 12:38:47 AM »



Pictured: a mob lynching a black man in downtown in broad daylight. Dallas, Texas, 1910.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,260
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2016, 01:14:31 AM »

Seeing as a sitting president was assassinated by an anarchist, there were numerous red scares and  several brutal foreign adventures, not really.
Logged
Chunk Yogurt for President!
CELTICEMPIRE
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,236
Georgia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2016, 09:07:44 AM »

The '20s were better.
Logged
Mr. Reactionary
blackraisin
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,811
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.45, S: -3.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2016, 07:59:01 PM »

There Will Be Blood took place during that time period and I love everything about that movie, so somewhat.
Logged
Cubby
Pim Fortuyn
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,067
Israel


Political Matrix
E: -3.74, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 02, 2016, 10:27:38 PM »

Seeing as a sitting president was assassinated by an anarchist, there were numerous red scares and  several brutal foreign adventures, not really.

I hate to be "that guy", but there weren't any Red Scares in the US until 1919.

The era was quaint in terms of technology (iceboxes, silent movies, etc.) but life was not better than today for most people. 

As for Mikado's picture, which took my breath away: Were lynchings just as common in cities as in rural areas? There was a horrible, graphic one in Waco in 1915 and one of a Jewish man in Atlanta around 1913 but I wonder if the ones in cities received more press coverage due to more witnesses & newspapers whereas out in the boondocks it would be swept under the rug. You would think people in cities would be more civilized and less likely to tolerate these tragedies.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,601
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 02, 2016, 11:29:38 PM »

I do find the Belle Epoque (1871 - 1914) interesting in all areas of the world, but "quaint" is not the word I would use.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.