CNN Derry, NH Democratic town hall @9pm ET **live commentary thread**

[Shadows]

Sanders has three attacks on Clinton.  She gave speeches to Goldman Sachs executives.  She takes donations from wall street.  She voted for the Iraq War thirteen years ago.  It must be frustrating for Clinton to hear people criticize her for "going negative" or "going on the attack" and then in the next breath talking about how much they love that Sanders has run a positive campaign, like that woman who was just on CNN five minutes ago.

In other news, I liked Hillary's answer about sneaking out of the White House in a baseball cap.

Facts CAN NOT be attacks. When you make such idiotic decisions, you really have to dim-witted to think that your opponent will not point such mistakes. Obama attacked her, Chaffe did, Web did, O Malley did in 1st debate.

Clinton has Benghazi scam hanging over his head, changes stances every time whether LGBT or TPP or Keystone, is a proven lier & so on. If I was Sanders I would have called her war hungry, the voice of wall street & similar to a centrist Republican. I have no idea why Sanders is so soft on her when her campaign is throwing so much dirt around with such cheap statements & lies.

Clinton got to go last but still messed up. It's unreal how can people continue to vote such a horrible candidate.

Biden must run if Democrats want a more centrist candidate

[Holmes]

How can one town hall produce such a foaming mouth reaction?

[Lyin' Steve]

Facts CAN NOT be attacks. When you make such idiotic decisions, you really have to dim-witted to think that your opponent will not point such mistakes. Obama attacked her, Chaffe did, Web did, O Malley did in 1st debate.

None of those politicians promised to run positive campaigns.  Bernie has.
Pointing out a fact would be saying "Hillary voted for the Iraq War."
Attacking is "When we talk about foreign policy, we need to recognize that it's important to consider the judgment of a leader.  In 2003, I voted against the Iraq War.  Hillary voted for it.  That was a clear lapse in judgment, and I think it reveals fundamental flaws in her character."
or "I do not think it's controversial to point out that someone who took money from Wall Street can never change Wall Street.  When you are a politician who is bought and paid for by Wall Street billionaires, it is impossible for you to bring about real change."
The fact that they're not heavy, blunt and loud like Trump doesn't mean they're not attacks.  It just means they're very well-crafted attacks because they're calm and subtle and don't automatically repulse people.  Bernie is a very skilled politician and has a crack team working for him.

[Shadows]

Facts CAN NOT be attacks. When you make such idiotic decisions, you really have to dim-witted to think that your opponent will not point such mistakes. Obama attacked her, Chaffe did, Web did, O Malley did in 1st debate.

None of those politicians promised to run positive campaigns.  Bernie has.
Pointing out a fact would be saying "Hillary voted for the Iraq War."
Attacking is "When we talk about foreign policy, we need to recognize that it's important to consider the judgment of a leader.  In 2003, I voted against the Iraq War.  Hillary voted for it.  That was a clear lapse in judgment, and I think it reveals fundamental flaws in her character."
or "I do not think it's controversial to point out that someone who took money from Wall Street can never change Wall Street.  When you are a politician who is bought and paid for by Wall Street billionaires, it is impossible for you to bring about real change."
The fact that they're not heavy, blunt and loud like Trump doesn't mean they're not attacks.  It just means they're very well-crafted attacks because they're calm and subtle and don't automatically repulse people.  Bernie is a very skilled politician and has a crack team working for him.

This is what my problem is with Bernie.He is refusing to say these things You smarty inserted 1 lie after 3 of Sanders (fundamental flaw which he never said - Any lies to get your point right ?

I personally think Hillary is a lier, bought by Wall Street, neo-Republican, War-hunrgy, opportunist, corrupt. I do not like her role in Benghazi or her role in Bill's affair. I HAVE NO IDEA why Bernie would not call Clinton out on this directly.

Lie - When you are a politician who is bought and paid for by Wall Street billionaires, it is impossible for you to bring about real change."

Another lie you used - and I think it reveals fundamental flaws in her character.

What Sanders said was

A - I don't think Wall Street is so naive to pay millions & not get anything back or you can say you take Millions of $ and not be influenced?

B - Yes she has experience but you should also have judgement & his record vs Clinton in Iraq & others shows he has better judgement.

Both ARE 100% correct but way too soft IMO. Sanders is acting as if Clinton is his relative & is not attacking him directly (Call her a "lier" if she continually lies).

Hillary hacks would note vote for him & anyways throw mud at Sanders & then lie & twist his statements like here & call facts attacks.  Just call her out on what she is.