Frothy can't name any of Rubio's Senate accomplishments (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 07:51:53 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Frothy can't name any of Rubio's Senate accomplishments (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Frothy can't name any of Rubio's Senate accomplishments  (Read 1813 times)
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« on: February 04, 2016, 11:04:56 PM »

Just a thought, I had to Google the word "frothy" in conjunction with the name Santorum to find out why the nickname is used.  Now I know.  This is why we need more limits on free speech.  I would completely support throwing that a-hole in jail on obscenity charges (speaking about the vermin who published it).  The fact that people can get away with doing things like this, is why this country is in a sewer of liberalism and filth. 
As for Santorum naming Rubio's accomplishments, who cares?  Obama proved you don't need any accomplishments.  Just being an empty suit is enough!  Sure, Obama is smart, he's educated, he's elite.  But he never accomplished anything in the real world and is the least qualified person in any room he walks into!
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #1 on: February 05, 2016, 08:03:34 AM »

Just a thought, I had to Google the word "frothy" in conjunction with the name Santorum to find out why the nickname is used.  Now I know.  This is why we need more limits on free speech.

What specific limits to people’s free speech do you suggest?
If the intent is to inflict suffering on a person or damage his reputation using obscene terminology.  There is no excuse for it, no benefit to humanity, and it's not even funny!  In a closed setting, like a live comedy act, it is perhaps different. 
Logged
wolfsblood07
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 656
United States


« Reply #2 on: February 05, 2016, 09:19:55 AM »

Just a thought, I had to Google the word "frothy" in conjunction with the name Santorum to find out why the nickname is used.  Now I know.  This is why we need more limits on free speech.

What specific limits to people’s free speech do you suggest?
If the intent is to inflict suffering on a person or damage his reputation using obscene terminology.  There is no excuse for it, no benefit to humanity, and it's not even funny!  In a closed setting, like a live comedy act, it is perhaps different. 

Thank God we have you to determine what is and isn't funny!
Not to derail the thread, but another example: A little girl suffering from the disease progeria makes videos on Youtube.  The poor little thing looks horribly disfigured, but she has an innocent loving heart.  There are goofballs posting horrible comments on her videos, and someone even put up a website that makes fun of her and talks about how she should be killed in heinous ways.  I think that should be at least a civil offense if not criminal.  We need to go back to public floggings!
As children, we're taught to respect others, and that it's wrong to say certain things.  But as adults we have courts that allow the most sickening things under free speech.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.