Who won this one?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 10:07:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Who won this one?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: The big one, our first 1v1 duel of the cycle
#1
Big Blue (Hill)
 
#2
Old Faithful (Bern)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 71

Author Topic: Who won this one?  (Read 1690 times)
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 04, 2016, 11:11:39 PM »

Who outdueled the other?
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2016, 11:12:19 PM »

I'll go with Clinton. Both candidates had really good moments, and pretty bad ones, but Sanders had more bad ones I think.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,946


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2016, 11:12:41 PM »

Bernie pooped the bed big time in this debate.

I think his margin in NH just dropped by maybe 15%.
Logged
bedstuy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,526


Political Matrix
E: -1.16, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2016, 11:13:03 PM »

Clinton crushed. Bernie was dreadful on foreign policy.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,702
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2016, 11:13:40 PM »

Sanders made much more sense on the basics, but needed to counter Clinton's arguments and -desperately- needs to hire a foreign policy consultant.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2016, 11:14:22 PM »

Bernie had a really good close but his foreign policy answers were not where a major presidential contender should be.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2016, 11:14:54 PM »

Clinton won the foreign policy section, but the majority of the other sections were wins for Sanders. The part with Clinton getting booed is also probably going to get talked about as well. All in all, nothing about this debate will probably change what will happen in New Hampshire or the rest of the race.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,458
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2016, 11:17:21 PM »

Bernie pooped the bed big time in this debate.

I think his margin in NH just dropped by maybe 15%.

Yeah, that sounds rational...
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2016, 11:18:22 PM »

I don't pay him much attention, but he seemed aloof and sad and constantly just agreeing with Clinton's substantive answers, and then threw in a cute one liner for the kids.
Logged
Higgs
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,581


Political Matrix
E: 6.14, S: -4.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 04, 2016, 11:23:10 PM »

I only saw bits and pieces, could someone explain how Bernie did so bad on foreign policy questions?
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 04, 2016, 11:23:49 PM »

I only saw bits and pieces, could someone explain how Bernie did so bad on foreign policy questions?

He was vague, and went back to talking points quite a bit. Clinton dominated during that section.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 04, 2016, 11:24:47 PM »

It was the best debate of the cycle. Bernie dominated the first hour, Clinton carried the foreign policy section, and they both did very well in the last 40 minutes. On balance Bernie won.
Logged
Clarko95 📚💰📈
Clarko95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,599
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -5.61, S: -1.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 04, 2016, 11:26:49 PM »
« Edited: February 04, 2016, 11:30:23 PM by Clarko95 »

Hillary seriously f_cked up in the beginning. The first 30 minutes I thought she was going to wreck her own campaign and fulfill the "spiteful, slimy, hateable lawyer" image that everyone attacks her on. She did not handle the answers about campaign donations well (even though I think this "guilt by donation" thing is completely bullsh_t and low blow). There was severe discomfort; that was awful to watch.


But after that, she completely dominated the debate. Ending strongly is more important than starting, and even though there was blood in the beginning, they ended on a positive note. But she recovered with strong answers on Flint, electability, successfully tied herself to Obama, and absolutely crushed on foreign policy.

So in the end, Hillary. Bernie failed to destroy her, and she recovered and made a strong case for herself.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2016, 11:41:05 PM »

Hillary seriously f_cked up in the beginning. The first 30 minutes I thought she was going to wreck her own campaign and fulfill the "spiteful, slimy, hateable lawyer" image that everyone attacks her on. She did not handle the answers about campaign donations well (even though I think this "guilt by donation" thing is completely bullsh_t and low blow). There was severe discomfort; that was awful to watch.


But after that, she completely dominated the debate. Ending strongly is more important than starting, and even though there was blood in the beginning, they ended on a positive note. But she recovered with strong answers on Flint, electability, successfully tied herself to Obama, and absolutely crushed on foreign policy.

So in the end, Hillary. Bernie failed to destroy her, and she recovered and made a strong case for herself.
I'm not going to deny that she struggled with her answers on corporate donations and Wall Street, etc., but I think we must have been watching different debates at the beginning. The first question was about whether Clinton was a true Progressive, and I think she totally shut down that line of attack from Sanders. Since Sanders is the one saying or implying she isn't one, it really fell upon him to make the case, and it was obvious that he totally failed to do so while Clinton offered a vociferous defense of her work on progressive causes. Her answer on that issue was extremely well prepped and set up the rest of the debate for a really strong showing for her.
Logged
psychprofessor
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,293


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 04, 2016, 11:42:22 PM »

when tad devine is having issues post debate on msnbc trying to explain away sanders' foreign policy awkwardness, you know you lost
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2016, 12:21:37 AM »

Clinton crushed. Bernie was dreadful on foreign policy.

Foreign policy isn't really a big issue to democrats as much as campaign finance.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 05, 2016, 12:33:30 AM »

Clinton crushed. Bernie was dreadful on foreign policy.

Foreign policy isn't really a big issue to democrats as much as campaign finance.

oh ok then
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 05, 2016, 12:38:08 AM »

Clinton crushed. Bernie was dreadful on foreign policy.

Foreign policy isn't really a big issue to democrats as much as campaign finance.

oh ok then
I guess you could say that Sanders was the only one that got booed tonight... Oh wait no that was Hillary.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,748
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 05, 2016, 12:43:18 AM »

Clinton was on the defensive at the beginning, when (probably) more people were watching. She didn't do anything particularly bad, but being on the defensive is a bad look, especially in a one-on-one debate. In the second half, Sanders really sh**t the bed though. So overall, I think it's a wash. Sanders' clear ignorance on anything foreign policy-related should be a bit unnerving by this point.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 05, 2016, 12:44:51 AM »

Clinton crushed. Bernie was dreadful on foreign policy.

Foreign policy isn't really a big issue to democrats as much as campaign finance.

oh ok then
I guess you could say that Sanders was the only one that got booed tonight... Oh wait no that was Hillary.

So you're conceding that Sanders is weak on foreign policy, but you're saying that it doesn't matter in the primaries anyway, plus he's stronger on an issue you and a debate audience care more about?  Top notch strategy there, bud.
Logged
Blue3
Starwatcher
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,048
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 05, 2016, 12:52:19 AM »
« Edited: February 05, 2016, 01:44:16 AM by Blue3 »

Hillary.

And I think she actually was at her best in the beginning.

Especially her first answer on how almost no one fits Sander's version of a true progressive... yet Sanders is against gun control and voted against Immigration Reform and some may say that's not progressive enough... and then said it's time to move beyond labels and to issues.

And then Hillary telling Sanders to stop making implications, and if he's going to attack her integrity then to do it to her face.


I don't think many voters know Sanders voted to deregulate derivatives, or against Immigration reform, but now Hillary has brought that up.


Sanders also totally dodged the question on Afghanistan, talking about how he'd bomb ISIS and equip Arabs to fight ISIS instead of talking about Afghanistan.


And then Sanders talked about how he couldn't even get 60 Senate votes to get what he wanted done on the Veterans bill, and how he had to scale back to get something passed. While promising free college and healthcare.


Also, watch Hillary in her response to Flint, and her eyes right after she's done speaking. She's genuinely holding back tears there.
Logged
BuckeyeNut
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,458


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -7.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 05, 2016, 01:20:55 AM »

Hillary.

And I think she actually was at her best in the beginning.

Especially her first answer on how almost no one fits Sander's version of a true progressive... yet Sanders is against gun control and voted against Immigration Reform and some may say that's not progressive enough... and then said it's time to move beyond labels and to issues.

And then Hillary telling Sanders to stop making implications, and if he's going to attack her integrity then to do it to her face.


I don't think many voters know Sanders voted to reregulate derivatives, or against Immigration reform, but now Hillary has brought that up.


Sanders also totally dodged the question on Afghanistan, talking about how he'd bomb ISIS and equip Arabs to fight ISIS instead of talking about Afghanistan.


And then Sanders talked about how he couldn't even get 60 Senate votes to get what he wanted done on the Veterans bill, and how he had to scale back to get something passed. While promising free college and healthcare.


Also, watch Hillary in her response to Flint, and her eyes right after she's done speaking. She's genuinely holding back tears there.

I agree with this pretty much in it's entirety.
Logged
Adam Griffin
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,091
Greece


Political Matrix
E: -7.35, S: -6.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 05, 2016, 02:15:19 AM »

Look: I really don't give a s[inks]t about foreign policy or whether a candidate knows much about it, and we all know that the President of the United States is going to have more foreign policy advisers than literally anyone else in the world upon swearing in, but he really needs to have at least a fundamental set of talking points that jives with conventional military thought on the matter. Otherwise, he will continue to look like a bumbling old fool and it will negate his debate strengths in other categories among anyone not already firmly in his corner.
Logged
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 05, 2016, 02:25:06 AM »

Look: I really don't give a s[inks]t about foreign policy or whether a candidate knows much about it, and we all know that the President of the United States is going to have more foreign policy advisers than literally anyone else in the world upon swearing in, but he really needs to have at least a fundamental set of talking points that jives with conventional military thought on the matter. Otherwise, he will continue to look like a bumbling old fool and it will negate his debate strengths in other categories among anyone not already firmly in his corner.

This is so irresponsible.  Virtually any complicated job requires good intuition and rock-solid fundamentals to make good decisions, no matter how much advice one is given.  Just like you can't just read a book about skiing and then go out there and ski, even if you're surrounded by ski instructors.  You have to have a feel for what the right thing to do is.
It's a lot more than just weighing pros and cons and using common sense.  If that was all there was to it, the president wouldn't have to make decisions because his advisors would make them for him and tell him exactly what to do.  They trust the president to synthesize their advice with his or her judgment, experience and intuition to make the right decision.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,707


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 05, 2016, 02:34:31 AM »

Obviously Bernie has less experience than Hillary in turning the middle east into a sh**thole. But that's not a bad thing.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.058 seconds with 15 queries.