FL: Florida Southern College: Trump up 7, Clinton up 43-26

[RI]

http://saintpetersblog.com/archives/252092

27 Trump
20 Rubio
12 Cruz
  6 Carson
  4 Bush

43 Clinton
26 Sanders

[Landslide Lyndon]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

[The Other Castro]

Looks like the undecideds on the Democratic side are growing.

[Matty]

not a bad poll for rubio

[cinyc]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm not sure why you'd expect Florida Southern College to poll Nevada.  That wouldn't make sense.  Maybe UNLV or the University of Nevada at Reno should run their own polls.  But they usually don't, and Nevada doesn't have unique in-state for-profit pollsters like Michigan, so you don't get Nevada polls.

[Skye]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

[Gass3268]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

Same with South Carolina for the Republicans. Hasn't been a poll there since before Iowa.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm not sure why you'd expect Florida Southern College to poll Nevada.  That wouldn't make sense.  Maybe UNLV or the University of Nevada at Reno should run their own polls.  But they usually don't, and Nevada doesn't have unique in-state for-profit pollsters like Michigan, so you don't get Nevada polls.

I was talking in general, not about that university. I'm just frustrated that we get polls from every state but the ones who matter right now.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Sanders isnt gonna stop Clinton from reaching 50% in FL. Now, its an expectations game. Stay above 55 so you dont split delegates.

[President Johnson]

LOL ¿Jeb?

What caused TRUMP to fall to 27%? I think he'll be much stronger in Florida than that.

[A Perez]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Is Quinnipiac in Iowa? Is Monmouth in New Hampshire?

[cinyc]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Is Quinnipiac in Iowa? Is Monmouth in New Hampshire?

Quinnipiac and Monmouth have a reputation for polling outside of their home states.  Florida Southern College does not.

UNLV has a polling institute, but so far they haven't polled Nevada (or at least haven't polled much).  Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, there are few active college pollsters in Nevada and it doesn't have the crappy private pollsters that Michigan has to fill the void.

[Supersonic]

Bush at 4% is hilarious. 

[A Perez]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Is Quinnipiac in Iowa? Is Monmouth in New Hampshire?

Quinnipiac and Monmouth have a reputation for polling outside of their home states.  Florida Southern College does not.

UNLV has a polling institute, but so far they haven't polled Nevada (or at least haven't polled much).  Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, there are few active college pollsters in Nevada and it doesn't have the crappy private pollsters that Michigan has to fill the void.

You didn't explain why this FL cannot do what Quinnipiac and Monmouth do. You invented the "reputation" answer, but your original post had nothing to do with "reputation".

[Skye]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Is Quinnipiac in Iowa? Is Monmouth in New Hampshire?

Quinnipiac and Monmouth have a reputation for polling outside of their home states.  Florida Southern College does not.

UNLV has a polling institute, but so far they haven't polled Nevada (or at least haven't polled much).  Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, there are few active college pollsters in Nevada and it doesn't have the crappy private pollsters that Michigan has to fill the void.

You didn't explain why this FL cannot do what Quinnipiac and Monmouth do. You invented the "reputation" answer, but your original post had nothing to do with "reputation".

Because they probably don't have an organization that allows them to do it? Quinnipiac and Monmouth both have well known and respected polling institutes that can conduct research in some states. Remember the polling business can be quite expensive.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

I expect Rubio to do well here, Trump will do well in southern and Central, but in the North and Pan-handle that is Cruz territory

[cinyc]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

I'm sure theFlorida Southern College would poll Nevada over Florida.

Is Quinnipiac in Iowa? Is Monmouth in New Hampshire?

Quinnipiac and Monmouth have a reputation for polling outside of their home states.  Florida Southern College does not.

UNLV has a polling institute, but so far they haven't polled Nevada (or at least haven't polled much).  Unlike Iowa and New Hampshire, there are few active college pollsters in Nevada and it doesn't have the crappy private pollsters that Michigan has to fill the void.

You didn't explain why this FL cannot do what Quinnipiac and Monmouth do. You invented the "reputation" answer, but your original post had nothing to do with "reputation".

IIRC, Monmouth sometimes gets paid by outside organizations to poll for them.  Marist College in New York does, too.  Quinnipiac might, too, but Quinnipiac has always polled outside of Connecticut, regardless.  There are only so many races Quinnipiac can poll in an uncompetitive state like Connecticut to get their name ID up.  Florida Southern College is neither famous in polling nor prolific.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Looks like the undecideds on the Democratic side are growing.

Undecided could be the frontrunner soon at this rate.

[/]

Nice work guys, poll every state BUT Nevada which is next.

^^^

Anyway, LOL at 4% for Bush

[Lord of the Dome]

not a bad poll for rubio

Conducted largely in the week of Marcomentum and in his home state

[tokar]

Nice to see a new poll, but this poll is MOSTLY useless. I say mostly, because there is still something telling.

It is useless because the polling dates are over January 30 to February 6. Way to go Mr. Pollster. You included the full effects of the Jan 25 debate and Feb 1 Iowa Caucus, half effect of the Feb 4 debate, but lack entirely the full effect of the New Hampshire primary and Bernie's recently successes in donations.

However, the useful data from this poll are the polling percents. 17 point lead sounds like a lot until you compare to earlier polls showing HRC at +25-45!
https://uselectionatlas.org/POLLS/PRESIDENT/2016D/polls.php?fips=12
HRC has routinely polled ABOVE 55%. Now? This poll reads 43%,.
BS has polled mostly in the teens. He has solidified at 26%.
Undecided (I guess?) has jumped 25% or so.

Seems like people are thinking about Bernie.