Atlas Predicts NH 2016: Who did the best, who did the worst?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 06:21:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Atlas Predicts NH 2016: Who did the best, who did the worst?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: Atlas Predicts NH 2016: Who did the best, who did the worst?  (Read 2367 times)
Ronnie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,993
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2016, 05:16:40 PM »

Lol, I crashed and burned this time.  Oh well, at least I did okay in Iowa.
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2016, 05:19:56 PM »

If y'all get a chance, a graph of Iowa vs. NH error would be intriguing as it would show who just got lucky by under/overestimating their favorite candidate consistently, who is actually good at predicting (in the context of two races of course), and who got Iowa wrong and then put too much stock in those results as race-changing.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2016, 05:25:28 PM »

If y'all get a chance, a graph of Iowa vs. NH error would be intriguing as it would show who just got lucky by under/overestimating their favorite candidate consistently, who is actually good at predicting (in the context of two races of course), and who got Iowa wrong and then put too much stock in those results as race-changing.

Eh...2 states is a bit of small sample size. We could do it but I doubt it would reveal anything significant.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2016, 05:27:20 PM »

I didn't think I'd actually end up underestimating Sanders again, but I'm pleased either way. The Republican numbers have not been great to me :/
Logged
Bakersfield Uber Alles
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,733
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2016, 05:30:33 PM »

Lol, I crashed and burned this time.  Oh well, at least I did okay in Iowa.

Same here. First in Iowa... 55th in New Hampshire.
Logged
Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin
Runeghost
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,426


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 10, 2016, 05:45:29 PM »

I was really out of the ballpark this time.

Thank you for doing this!
Logged
Sprouts Farmers Market ✘
Sprouts
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,764
Italy


Political Matrix
E: -4.90, S: 1.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 10, 2016, 06:02:45 PM »

If y'all get a chance, a graph of Iowa vs. NH error would be intriguing as it would show who just got lucky by under/overestimating their favorite candidate consistently, who is actually good at predicting (in the context of two races of course), and who got Iowa wrong and then put too much stock in those results as race-changing.

Eh...2 states is a bit of small sample size. We could do it but I doubt it would reveal anything significant.

Obviously. No one can predict well with any degree of significance! This is for bragging rights which is even more important
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 10, 2016, 06:28:24 PM »

If y'all get a chance, a graph of Iowa vs. NH error would be intriguing as it would show who just got lucky by under/overestimating their favorite candidate consistently, who is actually good at predicting (in the context of two races of course), and who got Iowa wrong and then put too much stock in those results as race-changing.

Eh...2 states is a bit of small sample size. We could do it but I doubt it would reveal anything significant.

Obviously. No one can predict well with any degree of significance! This is for bragging rights which is even more important

Oh dont worry, there will be ample stats provided for bragging rights Tongue
Logged
DanPrazeres
Rookie
**
Posts: 71


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 10, 2016, 06:41:08 PM »

I did well in Dems prediction, saved my round. Will it have overall separated rankings for the two parties?
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 10, 2016, 06:43:40 PM »

I did well in Dems prediction, saved my round. Will it have overall separated rankings for the two parties?

I am finishing up the combined stats for the first two contests and I will include a Dem/Rep total so you can see how you're doing in each instance.
Logged
DanPrazeres
Rookie
**
Posts: 71


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 10, 2016, 06:45:19 PM »

I did well in Dems prediction, saved my round. Will it have overall separated rankings for the two parties?

I am finishing up the combined stats for the first two contests and I will include a Dem/Rep total so you can see how you're doing in each instance.
Thanks Smiley
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 10, 2016, 07:02:24 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!

Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 10, 2016, 07:27:58 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!



Where did you post your IA prediction?
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 10, 2016, 07:31:05 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!



Where did you post your IA prediction?

I didn't! But I have WhatsApps which prove that was my prediction hahaha...
Logged
PaperKooper
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 827
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.23, S: 5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 10, 2016, 07:43:21 PM »

Lol, 4th in Iowa to 55th in New Hampshire. 
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 10, 2016, 07:47:42 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!




Where did you post your IA prediction?

I didn't! But I have WhatsApps which prove that was my prediction hahaha...

If you made predictions before for both Republicans and Democrats, you can PM me your picks and i'll include them if they were not included before.
Logged
pho
iheartpho
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 852
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: -1.39

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 10, 2016, 07:50:02 PM »

Lol I suck.
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 10, 2016, 08:21:47 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!




Where did you post your IA prediction?

I didn't! But I have WhatsApps which prove that was my prediction hahaha...

If you made predictions before for both Republicans and Democrats, you can PM me your picks and i'll include them if they were not included before.

OK, thank you! The problem is that in the GOP race in IA I only predicted %s for Trump (30), Cruz (23), Rubio (20) and Carson ( 8 )...
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 10, 2016, 08:39:17 PM »

Fun fact: if I had posted my prediction for IA here, I'd have gotten the 1st place on the Dem. side too, as my prediction was 50 Clinton 49.5 Sanders Tongue

Thank you, Maxwell!! And thanks to everyone who has congratulated me (no one yet)!




Where did you post your IA prediction?

I didn't! But I have WhatsApps which prove that was my prediction hahaha...

If you made predictions before for both Republicans and Democrats, you can PM me your picks and i'll include them if they were not included before.

OK, thank you! The problem is that in the GOP race in IA I only predicted %s for Trump (30), Cruz (23), Rubio (20) and Carson ( 8 )...

Oh thats a bit problematic lol. Just keep submitting picks in the next primaries and IA wont matter to much.
Logged
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 10, 2016, 09:04:30 PM »

I will take 8th GOP/9th overall as a victory.

Just out of curiosity, what would be the percent error of the average of all predictions?
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 10, 2016, 09:25:56 PM »

I will take 8th GOP/9th overall as a victory.

Just out of curiosity, what would be the percent error of the average of all predictions?

I'm assuming you mean aggregating all of our predictions and then finding the error between our averages and the actual results.


Avg Rep Prediction   
Trump   28.0%
Rubio   14.5%
Cruz   13.2%
Kasich   16.4%
żJeb?   12.0%
Christie   9.0%
Fiorina   3.4%
Carson   2.8%
Gilmore   0.1%
   
Avg Dem Prediction   
Sanders   56%
Clinton   44%




Error on the Republican side: 17.4%
Error on the Dem side: 10.%
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 11, 2016, 11:36:28 AM »

53 people submitted full picks for both Iowa and New Hampshire. I have grouped them together in the  following standings. People who submitted picks for only 1 contest or incomplete picks will be put in a separate division to be released later. For the sake of rankings, I calculated the average error between the contests thus far for the Republican and Democrat primaries and then summed the two into a 'Total' ranking.


For the division with full picks, our current leader is TENDER BRANSON after 2 rounds of voting!

As usual open the image in a new tab to see a zoomed in picture.


Logged
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,700
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 11, 2016, 12:09:06 PM »
« Edited: February 11, 2016, 12:18:03 PM by Thinking Crumpets Crumpet »

Surprised I got third for the Republicans, since I'm pretty sure my top three were Trump-Cruz-Rubio.

Also, I'm not sure how you're calculating these scores or I'd do it myself, but someone should include Nate Silver's guesses in here to show how far superior we all are to him.

EDIT: His predictions were:
Republicans (polls plus)   
Trump   29.5%
Rubio   15.3%
Cruz   12.8%
Kasich   13.7%
Jeb     12.0%
Christie   6.5%
Fiorina   5.2%
Carson   3.7%
Gilmore   0.0%
   
Democrats (polls plus)   
Sanders   57.2%
Clinton   39.9%
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,567
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 11, 2016, 12:19:03 PM »

Surprised I got third for the Republicans, since I'm pretty sure my top three were Trump-Cruz-Rubio.

Also, I'm not sure how you're calculating these scores or I'd do it myself, but someone should include Nate Silver's guesses in here to show how far superior we all are to him.

EDIT: His predictions were:
Republicans (polls plus)   
Trump   29.5%
Rubio   15.3%
Cruz   12.8%
Kasich   13.7%
Jeb     12.0%
Christie   6.5%
Fiorina   5.2%
Carson   3.7%
Gilmore   0.0%
   
Democrats (polls plus)   
Sanders   57.2%
Clinton   39.9%


He actually did better than the Atlas average for NH.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 11, 2016, 12:23:14 PM »

Predicted a Sanders win 18-22% margin (depending on turnout).

With a 22% victory, I stand vindicated.

Also predicted Iowa will be a toss-up.

Close to 2 wins out of 2
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.