Bernie hurt himself in the debate.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 01:56:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Bernie hurt himself in the debate.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3
Author Topic: Bernie hurt himself in the debate.  (Read 5420 times)
Joe Biden is your president. Deal with it.
diskymike44
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,831


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 12, 2016, 04:48:59 AM »

Bernie likely doomed himself by attacking President Obama rather than embracing him like Hillary did. If you look at it, in 2014 mostly all the democratic candidates that ran for senate attacked or distanced themselves from Obama and they ended up loosing badly. Hillary did the right thing by standing by Obama and defending him. That will help her a lot in the end.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2016, 05:10:43 AM »

Lol ok "Clinton 2016".
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2016, 05:17:40 AM »

#Hillaryhack
#Cheap-ploy
#Dishonestperson
#Peopleseethroughit
Logged
Famous Mortimer
WillipsBrighton
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,010
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2016, 05:50:21 AM »

The reason Sanders distanced himself from Obama were different from the reasons congressional Democrats distanced themselves from Obama. You must understand this, if you understand American politics at all. Otherwise you shouldn't be on this board.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,803
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2016, 05:55:38 AM »

The reason Sanders distanced himself from Obama were different from the reasons congressional Democrats distanced themselves from Obama. You must understand this, if you understand American politics at all. Otherwise you shouldn't be on this board.

Maybe you can explain why someone who runs in a Democratic primary distances himself from the most popular Democrat in the country.
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 12, 2016, 06:09:44 AM »

The reason Sanders distanced himself from Obama were different from the reasons congressional Democrats distanced themselves from Obama. You must understand this, if you understand American politics at all. Otherwise you shouldn't be on this board.

Maybe you can explain why someone who runs in a Democratic primary distances himself from the most popular Democrat in the country.

Can you not ever disagree with a president on any issue?? What are you even talking about? Bernie agrees with Obama with most issues.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 12, 2016, 06:12:40 AM »

The reason Sanders distanced himself from Obama were different from the reasons congressional Democrats distanced themselves from Obama. You must understand this, if you understand American politics at all. Otherwise you shouldn't be on this board.

Maybe you can explain why someone who runs in a Democratic primary distances himself from the most popular Democrat in the country.

With a 47% Approval rating & where 80% odd of the country thinks that the country is going in a wrong direction. Bernie said he agreed with Obama on most issues & he gives him due credit for the recovery since the mess Bush left them in.

But there are differences & should be.

I personally would rate Obama as an above average to decent president , but not an amazing one, for which he was voted in office.
Logged
Panhandle Progressive
politicaljunkie
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 855
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 12, 2016, 06:25:33 AM »

#Hillaryhack
#Cheap-ploy
#Dishonestperson
#Peopleseethroughit

#canwininNOV
#clintoncoalition
#longtimeDEM
#mostexperienced
Logged
ProgressiveCanadian
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,690
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 12, 2016, 06:28:59 AM »

#Hillaryhack
#Cheap-ploy
#Dishonestperson
#Peopleseethroughit

#canwininNOV
#clintoncoalition
#longtimeDEM
#mostexperienced

#boughtbywallstreet
#calledblacks"super-predators"
#votedtowarwithiraq
#cantwinagainsttrump
Logged
SillyAmerican
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,052
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 12, 2016, 07:54:39 AM »

#Hillaryhack
#Cheap-ploy
#Dishonestperson
#Peopleseethroughit

#canwininNOV
#clintoncoalition
#longtimeDEM
#mostexperienced

#boughtbywallstreet
#calledblacks"super-predators"
#votedtowarwithiraq
#cantwinagainsttrump

#weneedsomeonebetter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI
Logged
°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,149
Uruguay


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 12, 2016, 09:04:55 AM »

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008. Sanders defended himself quite well. He has been a very strong supporter of Obama, but disagrees with him on certain issues. Do we want an Obama "clone"? Republicans want to tie the two to Obama. Obama is not running for re-election and their attacks on Obama are therefore totally lame. The question is what specific candidates have to say on specific issues. I plan to support Clinton, vehemently, if she is the nominee, btw.
We can't have any Republican especially a PRO-TORTURE Republican win the White House.
Literally does not mean figuratively and yes I do believe that torture is literally medieval.
Do we really want to go backwards 1000 years? I would like to see more focus from Clinton and Sanders towards criticisizing the Republican frontrunner and his ultra conservative views and rude behaviour.
Logged
RaphaelDLG
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,687
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 12, 2016, 09:13:39 AM »
« Edited: February 12, 2016, 09:17:20 AM by RaphaelDLG »

I'm an enthusiastic Sanders supporter and Obama hater who nevertheless voted for Obama out of necessity/for Supreme Court judges/so we wouldn't invade every country in the middle east.

I think OP is right - every time Bernie has to talk about President Obama, he loses, because Democratic primary voters are for the most part dopey sheep who think Obama is a cool thoughtful persecuted guy for whom they enjoy having a handbag/t-shirt of, rather than a center-right, corporatist drone child murderer.

I think, especially with older black people, Bernie is basically screwed because Obama is like the one black person who is respected/listened to/saintly/above reproach for them (my impression is that they don't give a sh**t what people like Al Sharpton think really despite media proclamations to the contrary).
Logged
PresidentTRUMP
2016election
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 945


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 12, 2016, 09:53:05 AM »

I never thought id say this in a MILLION years, but Hillary is in trouble right now against a Socialist Senator that is 75 years old.

She better carry Nevada and SC, if they are close or Bernie finds a way to pull one out this is going to go down to the wire.

I just don't see many on the left passionate about Hillary.

I will say this, shes very moderate compared to obama and Bernie and fiscally may be slightly to the right and on social issues slightly to the left. I could certainly live with a Hillary presidency as a republican.

Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 12, 2016, 10:12:57 AM »

Bernie likely doomed himself by attacking President Obama rather than embracing him like Hillary did. If you look at it, in 2014 mostly all the democratic candidates that ran for senate attacked or distanced themselves from Obama and they ended up loosing badly. Hillary did the right thing by standing by Obama and defending him. That will help her a lot in the end.

How do you think Hillary Clinton fared when she mentioned her admiration of Henry Kissinger?

@ http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2016/02/12/hillary-clintons-ties-to-henry-kissinger-come-back-to-haunt-her/

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Does Richard Nixon's secretary of state sound to you like Hillary Clinton is a, as she has now labeled herself, "progressive?"

Logged
DS0816
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,137
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 12, 2016, 10:32:30 AM »

The reason Sanders distanced himself from Obama were different from the reasons congressional Democrats distanced themselves from Obama. You must understand this, if you understand American politics at all. Otherwise you shouldn't be on this board.

Maybe you can explain why someone who runs in a Democratic primary distances himself from the most popular Democrat in the country.

Bernie Sanders isn't Barack Obama.

He's not trying to be.

But, Hillary Clinton has tried to impress on voters that she would continue Obama policies.

It hasn't been working well for her [so far].


Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,079
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 12, 2016, 11:15:00 AM »

#Hillaryhack
#Cheap-ploy
#Dishonestperson
#Peopleseethroughit

#canwininNOV
#clintoncoalition
#longtimeDEM
#mostexperienced

#boughtbywallstreet
#calledblacks"super-predators"
#votedtowarwithiraq
#cantwinagainsttrump

#weneedsomeonebetter

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dY77j6uBHI

#fortheloveofgodstopusinghashtagspleeeeeeeeease
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,119
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 12, 2016, 11:25:20 AM »

It's important to remember that Sanders is not a Democrat and is only running in the Democratic primary as a convenience. He would had to build a database from scratch running as an independent. He can't stand Obama and has made that clear a long time ago.
Logged
🦀🎂🦀🎂
CrabCake
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,243
Kiribati


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 12, 2016, 11:28:03 AM »

I hurt myself today
To see if I still rose in the polls
I focus on my stump speech
The only thing that's real
The Clinton tears a hole
The old familiar sting
Try to kill my minority support
But I remember everything

What have I become
My sweetest berniebro
Everyone I know goes away
In the end
And you could have it all
My empire of delegates
I will let you down
I will make you Bernt
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 12, 2016, 12:38:25 PM »

I hurt myself today
To see if I still rose in the polls
I focus on my stump speech
The only thing that's real
The Clinton tears a hole
The old familiar sting
Try to kill my minority support
But I remember everything

What have I become
My sweetest berniebro
Everyone I know goes away
In the end
And you could have it all
My empire of delegates
I will let you down
I will make you Bernt


Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 12, 2016, 12:43:50 PM »


Uh, by your logic your post is equally as irrelevant based on your giant Sanders signature Roll Eyes

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008.

I thought about this, but while it makes for a nice sound bite, it's not a good comeback logic-wise. A great deal of Democrats didn't support Obama at first, including African Americans. They did after they got to know him and more so after seeing his presidency in action. Likewise, Clinton didn't know him or what his presidency would be like until after. And surely she knows as she went to work with her primary rival.

So the difference here is Sanders is, you could say, "running against Obama" after 8 years of him in office. It's completely different.

However, I do have to say I still think a primary candidate should be able to offer some criticism of their party's sitting president if it is warranted.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,803
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 12, 2016, 12:46:16 PM »


Uh, by your logic your post is equally as irrelevant based on your giant Sanders signature Roll Eyes

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008.

I thought about this, but while it makes for a nice sound bite, it's not a good comeback logic-wise. Most people didn't support Obama at first, including African Americans. They did after they got to know him and saw his presidency in action. Likewise, Clinton didn't know him or what his presidency would be like until after. And surely she knows as she went to work with her primary rival.

So the difference here is Sanders is, you could say, "running against Obama" after 8 years of him in office. It's completely different.

However, I do have to say I still think a primary candidate should be able to offer some criticism of their party's sitting president if it is warranted.

It's completely illogical because Joe Biden also ran against Obama in 2008. Does this mean that he is disloyal too?
Logged
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,119
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 12, 2016, 12:48:06 PM »


Uh, by your logic your post is equally as irrelevant based on your giant Sanders signature Roll Eyes

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008.

I thought about this, but while it makes for a nice sound bite, it's not a good comeback logic-wise. A great deal of Democrats didn't support Obama at first, including African Americans. They did after they got to know him and more so after seeing his presidency in action. Likewise, Clinton didn't know him or what his presidency would be like until after. And surely she knows as she went to work with her primary rival.

So the difference here is Sanders is, you could say, "running against Obama" after 8 years of him in office. It's completely different.

However, I do have to say I still think a primary candidate should be able to offer some criticism of their party's sitting president if it is warranted.

I think that was an irrelevant point since Clinton was in that race before Obama. It's not like she set out to oppose him.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 12, 2016, 12:51:24 PM »


Uh, by your logic your post is equally as irrelevant based on your giant Sanders signature Roll Eyes

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008.

I thought about this, but while it makes for a nice sound bite, it's not a good comeback logic-wise. A great deal of Democrats didn't support Obama at first, including African Americans. They did after they got to know him and more so after seeing his presidency in action. Likewise, Clinton didn't know him or what his presidency would be like until after. And surely she knows as she went to work with her primary rival.

So the difference here is Sanders is, you could say, "running against Obama" after 8 years of him in office. It's completely different.

However, I do have to say I still think a primary candidate should be able to offer some criticism of their party's sitting president if it is warranted.

I think that was an irrelevant point since Clinton was in that race before Obama. It's not like she set out to oppose him.

Yes, but by March, she had gone full-on raging banshee mode. Even if she didn't set out to oppose Obama, she mercilessly attacked him.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,803
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 12, 2016, 12:54:19 PM »


Uh, by your logic your post is equally as irrelevant based on your giant Sanders signature Roll Eyes

I think the issue has been "spun" by Clinton. As Sanders pointed out Clinton ran against Obama in 2008.

I thought about this, but while it makes for a nice sound bite, it's not a good comeback logic-wise. A great deal of Democrats didn't support Obama at first, including African Americans. They did after they got to know him and more so after seeing his presidency in action. Likewise, Clinton didn't know him or what his presidency would be like until after. And surely she knows as she went to work with her primary rival.

So the difference here is Sanders is, you could say, "running against Obama" after 8 years of him in office. It's completely different.

However, I do have to say I still think a primary candidate should be able to offer some criticism of their party's sitting president if it is warranted.

I think that was an irrelevant point since Clinton was in that race before Obama. It's not like she set out to oppose him.

Yes, but by March, she had gone full-on raging banshee mode. Even if she didn't set out to oppose Obama, she mercilessly attacked him.

LOL, Sanders advocated a primary challenge against Obama in 2012. He is no position to question anybody else's loyalty to him.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,884
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 12, 2016, 12:55:54 PM »

Yes, but by March, she had gone full-on raging banshee mode. Even if she didn't set out to oppose Obama, she mercilessly attacked him.

Right, but that's still not the point. Clinton, along with basically everyone else, had no idea if Obama would be a great president, a good president, or an absolutely terrible president. Now we know. Sanders response is formed to give the impression that Clinton knew all that and mercilessly ran against him anyway.

At any rate, if he wants to frame it that way, then the voters can decide whether or not Sanders' criticism is warranted or not, as is the point of this whole shindig.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.056 seconds with 13 queries.