How would your town vote in Bloomberg v Trump v Clinton

[The Free North]

I would guess

Bloomberg: 45%
Clinton: 35%
Trump: 20%

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

Clinton 64%
Trump 20%
Bloomberg 16%

[Bismarck]

Trump 55-65 Clinton 30-40 Bloomberg 5-10
My home town in central Indiana is middle to upper middle class, religous, and went about 65-35 for Romney, 70-30 if you count the rural precincts.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Los Angeles will vote for the Democrat, as it should be.

[elcorazon]

Clinton 65%
Trump 25%
Bloomberg 10%

[Torie]

Clinton 64%
Trump 25%
Bloomberg 10%

[Bigby]

Trump 60%
Clinton 30%
Bloomberg 10%

[Asian Nazi]

Woodinville, WA

Clinton 60%
TRUMP 37%
Bloomberg 1%
Others 2%

Went 61.8-36.6 for Obama eight years ago, which is basically the Democrat ceiling.  Clinton will perform well out here, lots of moderate, affluent white voters.  Asians (11.5% of the population) and Hispanics (7.3%) will break hard against TRUMP too.  

Bloomberg won't place.  You guys are smoking Beltway crack.

[Mr. Illini]

Assuming that Bloomberg would gain enough steam to register 10-20% nationally...

Hometown:

Town is typically close to 50/50. Bloomberg would take a good deal of Republicans (most are moderate) and would skim off some Dems as well.

Clinton 40%
Bloomberg 35%
Trump 25%

College town:

Very Democratic town but in the middle of nowhere, so the Republicans in the town, most unaffiliated with the college, are of the variety that may support Trump. Bloomberg would be weak.

Clinton 60%
Trump 30%
Bloomberg 10%

Chicago:

Obama got 84% in 2012 and the Dem vote is obviously very strong and inelastic. Bloomberg would get some from each camp (Repubs in city are moderate and northside Dems are too) but not much.

Clinton 80%
Bloomberg 12%
Trump 8%

[Tender Branson]

Zell am See:

2016 Austrian Presidential Election (incl. 3 US candidates)

22% Van der Bellen (Greens)
20% Hofer (FPÖ)
17% Hundstorfer (SPÖ)
16% Griss (Indy)
13% Khol (ÖVP)
  4% Lugner (Indy)
  3% Clinton (Dem, doesn't speak German, but gets some anti-establishment votes)
  3% Trump (GOP, doesn't speak German, but gets some anti-establishment votes)
  2% Bloomberg (Indy, doesn't speak German, but gets some anti-establishment votes)

[The Other Castro]

My town would be pretty evenly split between the three as a socially liberal, fiscally conservative/moderate suburb of NYC.

[This account no longer in use.]

who care, massachusetts is safe anyways

But seriously, probably something like:

Clinton 45%
Trump 40%
Bloomberg 15%

[pho]

Ft. Worth, TX:

Trump - 59%
Clinton - 37%
Bloomberg - 4%

[President Johnson]

Leonberg, Germany (near Stuttgart)

Hillary: 60%
Bloomberg: 30%
TRUMP: 10%

[TheDeadFlagBlues]

Clinton 44%
Trump 40%
Johnson 7%
Stein 6%
Bloomberg 3%

something like this i guess (it's a college town)

[Middle-aged Europe]

Clinton 65%
Bloomberg 25%
Trump 5%

[True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)]

I don't live in a town.

[Bleeding heart conservative, HTMLdon]

Nashville, TN:
Clinton 55%
Trump 31%
Bloomberg 12%

Memphis, TN:
Clinton: 68%
Trump: 15%
Bloomberg: 13%

[LLR]

New York City

They're all somewhat from here, this'll be interesting.

Clinton: 48%
Bllomberg: 31%
Trump: 21%

[Coolface Sock #42069]

Chatham, IL

Generic suburban/exurban town, has grown from 10,000 to 14,000 since 2010, wealthiest town (by far) in the Springfield area. Went 70% for Mitt in 2012.

In a three-way election as described above, we would be left without an obvious candidate because there is no candidate among the three that would shrink the size and scope of government (and let the high earners in Chatham keep more of the money they earn).

With that being said, Trump would still carry Chatham, but not by the margin it gave Mitt:

Trump 55%
Clinton 27%
Bloomberg 9%
Gary Johnson 9%

I could see more protest votes for Johnson than that if Trump moves left in the general.

[Figueira]

82% Clinton
14% Trump
2% Stein
1% Bloomberg
1% Johnson

[Former Senator Haslam2020]

Trump: 72%
Clinton: 21%
Bloomberg: 5%
Stein: 1%
Other: 1%

[Clarko95 📚💰📈]

I'd guess around 45% for Hillary, 40% or so for Trump, and 15% tops for Bloomberg.


For reference, in 2004 it was 55% Bush, in 2008, 50% - 49% Obama, and in 2012 52% - 47% Romney.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

Minneapolis would vote in the high 70s for Clinton, Trump getting about 17-18% Republicans usually do here, and Bloomberg getting about 3%.

I'm surprised how many people still have Clinton leading their area.  Bloomberg v. Trump v. Clinton screams reverse 1912 to me, with Trump winning roughly 45/30/25 and carrying about 40 states.

LOL 25% for Bloomberg? His ceiling would be more like 5%. Not to mention the scenario is against Clinton, meaning you can't even bring up the "what if affluent Democrats get scared?" scenario...in such a scenario Bloomberg would probably perform worse than Nader 2000.

[🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸]

Norfolk VA

Clinton 70%
TRUMP 23%
Bloomby 4%