Is Senator Michael Bennet safe for reelection?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 04:37:46 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Is Senator Michael Bennet safe for reelection?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Is Senator Michael Bennet safe for reelection?  (Read 1636 times)
madelka
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 328
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 13, 2016, 04:53:48 PM »
« edited: February 13, 2016, 04:56:54 PM by madelka »

It seems so. He won relatively easily in 2010 and it looks like the Republican candidates are pretty awful.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 13, 2016, 04:54:52 PM »

2 points against an awful opponent is "easily"? Hell no he's not safe.
Logged
Asian Nazi
d32123
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,523
China


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 13, 2016, 04:56:38 PM »

He isn't safe but he'd be in more danger if the GOP could recruit a better candidate.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 13, 2016, 05:00:27 PM »

When Coffman decided not to run, Bennett sure became the favorite  to win
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 13, 2016, 05:00:47 PM »

He did not win easily at all in 2010; he trailed in the polls right up to election day and ended up winning extremely narrowly (by 1.5%), probably due to some gaffes committed by his opponent. With that said, you're right that the field against him in 2016 looks pretty weak and that Republicans have a great deal of defense to play in 2016, and their offense will be focused on NV, where they are likelier than not to gain a seat. Bennet will probably lose only in the event of an across-the-board Democratic meltdown.
Logged
Maxwell
mah519
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,459
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -6.96

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2016, 05:02:58 PM »

Too early to tell.
Logged
Mike Thick
tedbessell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,085


Political Matrix
E: -6.65, S: -8.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2016, 05:07:19 PM »

Favored? Yes. Safe? No.
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2016, 05:45:37 PM »

Logged
RogueBeaver
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,058
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2016, 06:31:06 PM »

Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2016, 07:34:39 PM »

Last Dem Corp poll had Strickland,  Bennett, Feingold & Murphy  holding up against GOP. Bennett was leading by 5 over Frazier.
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,188
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 13, 2016, 08:52:31 PM »


This. He's heavily favored, but people were saying the same thing about Mark Udall in 2014. His approval numbers aren't good, either.

Udall dropped the ball though, only Braley campaigned worse.

I doubt Bennet would risk being so single-issue.

Bennet seems like Heller back in 2012, vulnerable but still favored.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 13, 2016, 10:38:47 PM »

Dems are concentrating less on Pa these day, they are helping Masto, Strickland, Hassan, Murphy, and Kirkpatrick  as well as IL/WI
Logged
Suburbia
bronz4141
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,684
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 13, 2016, 11:32:15 PM »

Dems are concentrating less on Pa these day, they are helping Masto, Strickland, Hassan, Murphy, and Kirkpatrick  as well as IL/WI

Yea, I think that Pat Toomey probably gets reelected by 5-10 points. Sestak and McGinty aren't great candidates.
Logged
Sir Mohamed
MohamedChalid
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,673
United States



Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 18, 2016, 05:02:05 AM »

Not safe, but relatively sure. I give him a 70%chance to get reelected. But still too early to say.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 18, 2016, 08:58:45 AM »

Hell win by the sane margin as Hickenlooper 3-5%
Logged
President Punxsutawney Phil
TimTurner
Atlas Politician
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,432
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 18, 2016, 09:13:54 AM »

My guts say he's close to being a shoo-in, but you can't be completely sure.
Logged
Orser67
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,947
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 18, 2016, 05:14:19 PM »

Like Richard Burr, he should be fine so long as he doesn't make any huge gaffes/scandals and there isn't a landslide presidential election for the opposite party. But I definitely wouldn't call him safe. Few one-term incumbents in swing states are.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 18, 2016, 06:36:42 PM »

Not even close to safe.  It all depends on the candidate.  He would've lost in 2010 if it weren't for the Tea Party movement.
Logged
KingSweden
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,227
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 18, 2016, 08:30:47 PM »

Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 19, 2016, 09:00:43 PM »

Obviously not. Purple state and middling approval ratings. The only reason it's not a pure toss up is the GOP's weak bench, but it's not exactly unprecedented for an anonymous or "weak" candidate to emerge from obscurity and defeat a sitting senator.
Logged
Prince of Salem
JoMCaR
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,639
Peru


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 19, 2016, 09:04:52 PM »


This. He's heavily favored, but people were saying the same thing about Mark Udall in 2014. His approval numbers aren't good, either.
Logged
Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers
olawakandi
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 88,621
Jamaica
Political Matrix
E: -6.84, S: -0.17


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 20, 2016, 01:17:27 PM »

Hes not Udall, and Frasier isnt Gardner.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 21, 2016, 03:05:56 PM »

Clearly he's not safe, as a GOP wave, and a Republican (like RUBIO!!) winning Colorado by 5% or more would probably sink him. He is clearly the favorite, though.
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 22, 2016, 06:09:59 PM »

He will be safe if the Republicans play obstructionist games with the vacant US Senate seat.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 27, 2016, 12:33:08 AM »

Hes not Udall, and Frasier isnt Gardner.
Yes, Udall actually did stuff. I prefer Frazier, but if CO elects him, TNVol will call it racist and Safe R for Ben Carson.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.054 seconds with 12 queries.