The first one was harmless and generally inconsequential.
The First Bush - Clearly a positive
Guys please stop. President George H. W. Bush's wimpy bungling incompetence is what caused the first Gulf War and led to the decades of suffering and chaos that followed.
http://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/twenty-five-years-after-another-gulf-war
The conversation between Glaspie and Saddam Hussein occurred one week before Iraq invaded Kuwait.
If something like this happened on Obama's watch... oh, boy. When people say Obama has failed to show leadership and made bad foreign policy decisions I wonder what yardstick they are using.
Uh, I don't see why GHWB is "wimpy" for a miscommunication on part of of the ambassador. Saddam was hellbent on territorial expansion and fixing Iraq's finances with oil money, and this became urgent seeing the wreck Iraq was in after the Iran-Iraq War. Saddam was cocky and thought he could intimidate the U.S. if we decided to retaliate; even in the run up to the 2003 invasion, when his country was far,
far weaker than it was in late-1990, he was still taunting the U.S. and talking big game. He was a deluded dictator!
And this doesn't take away from the point that GHWB was pretty much neutral in overall effect on the U.S: he took on the NRA and gave us an assault weapons ban in 1989, bailed out and re-regulated the savings and loan industry after their crisis that year. In 1990 he gave us the Clean Air Act (helping us become free of acid rain), the Immigration Act, Americans with Disabilities Act (over the business lobby), compensation for people who were recklessly exposed to radiation in nuclear testing by the government, and oversaw the fall of the Berlin Wall and German reunification (over the UK and France's objections!). He gave us stronger employment discrimination protections with the Civil Rights Act of 1991, START I & II with Russia, and knew his limits during the fall of the Soviet Union.
Vetoing FMLA was stupid, and giving us Dan Qualye was blatant pandering and he could've screwed things up if he had to become President for whatever reason but in the end that thankfully didn't happen. Probably his biggest sin is nominating Clarence Thomas to the Supreme Court.
I don't buy into all the deranged conspiracy theories surrounding him, and I get why people don't like him, but in the end I'd say the view that he was neutral overall and mostly inconsequential is justified.