MA: Suffolk: Clinton up eight
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 11:39:52 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  MA: Suffolk: Clinton up eight
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: MA: Suffolk: Clinton up eight  (Read 1491 times)
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 28, 2016, 06:11:17 PM »

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,531
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2016, 06:11:47 PM »

That's the ballgame.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2016, 06:15:36 PM »

Well, congrats, nominee Clinton.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2016, 06:16:07 PM »

And pre-SC? Yup, checkmate.
Logged
trickmind
Rookie
**
Posts: 155
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2016, 06:18:02 PM »

Congrats Hillary for locking up the D nod 2 weeks before Trump does.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2016, 06:18:41 PM »

Here's the full numbers: https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2016/02/28/hillary-clinton-leads-bernie-sanders-new-mass-poll/xmPEusn1LZ40zstVwqh8hO/story.html

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Holmes
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,754
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -5.74

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2016, 06:22:06 PM »

If she leads among Democrats by 22% in Massachusetts then she will win Colorado. Closed caucus, no voter registration at the door.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2016, 06:22:52 PM »

I would be careful here, the polls in New Hampshire showed Clinton gaining in the last week or so and it was still a blowout.

But, if Clinton does win here, and by that much, goodbye Sanders (as a viable candidate for the nomination), hello Sanders (as a Ron Paul type protest candidate).
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,485
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2016, 06:54:53 PM »

Yeah, it's over. I actually think Sanders might have a better shot at Oklahoma than Massachusetts at this point.
Logged
gf20202
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 329
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2016, 07:11:15 PM »

Yeah, it's over. I actually think Sanders might have a better shot at Oklahoma than Massachusetts at this point.
I think Sanders' internals agree. On the Sunday shows, he listed Oklahoma as a likely win, but only said "we will do very well in Massachusetts."
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,485
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2016, 07:16:44 PM »

Yeah, it's over. I actually think Sanders might have a better shot at Oklahoma than Massachusetts at this point.
I think Sanders' internals agree. On the Sunday shows, he listed Oklahoma as a likely win, but only said "we will do very well in Massachusetts."

I noticed that as well.
Logged
Pyro
PyroTheFox
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,705
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2016, 07:18:17 PM »

Liz Warren's gotta be getting tons of calls from Sanders people right about now.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2016, 07:28:30 PM »

This state has been consistently slipping away from Sanders.  Ever since that PPP poll had him up 7 points, every poll has had Clinton improving on the previous poll.  At this point, I honestly wouldn't be surprised by a double digit win.
Logged
Attorney General, LGC Speaker, and Former PPT Dwarven Dragon
Dwarven Dragon
Atlas Politician
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,718
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: -0.52

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2016, 07:41:07 PM »

Liz Warren's gotta be getting tons of calls from Sanders people right about now.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2016, 07:42:44 PM »

Liz Warren's gotta be getting tons of calls from Sanders people right about now.

But, as we all know, Warren will be endorsing Clinton tomorrow.
Logged
TheDeadFlagBlues
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,990
Canada
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2016, 07:56:36 PM »

Yeah, it's over. I actually think Sanders might have a better shot at Oklahoma than Massachusetts at this point.

Oklahoma will be hilarious. I wouldn't be surprised if Sanders wins by 10 points, if only because there are going to be a lot of registered Democrats who will attempt to vote for Trump on Tuesday, discover that they cannot and then vote for the anti-Hillary candidate.

Note: I'm not saying this out of thin air; voting registration figures in southeastern Oklahoma are still incredibly lopsided, which is bad for Hillary and Trump. For this reason, I expect Cruz to win Oklahoma as well. 
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2016, 08:18:03 PM »

Liz Warren's gotta be getting tons of calls from Sanders people right about now.

But, as we all know, Warren will be endorsing Clinton tomorrow.

Obama had the Kennedys and we know the impact that had in MA.
Logged
HillOfANight
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,459
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2016, 08:26:22 PM »

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/bernie-sanders-super-tuesday-south-carolina-219931

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
His campaign seems to know he'll lose MA too.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2016, 08:30:45 PM »

Well, it was nice while it lasted.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2016, 08:38:53 PM »


This surprises me. I wouldn't have expected that to be the county breakdown.
Logged
Figueira
84285
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,175


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2016, 08:48:48 PM »

If she leads among Democrats by 22% in Massachusetts then she will win Colorado. Closed caucus, no voter registration at the door.

A lot of unenrolled voters in Massachusetts (myself included) would be Democrats in a state like Colorado, so it doesn't mean quite as much as you'd think, but it would have an impact.
Logged
Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,416


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: February 29, 2016, 12:09:43 AM »


What would you have thought? I'd have assumed non-Hampden Western Mass and the islands for Sanders, Clinton everywhere else except maybe Middlesex.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,157
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: February 29, 2016, 12:48:08 AM »

Oh great. So Bernie won't even win the 4 States he might have had a chance in. And we're going to get a boring-ass primary map with 45 to 48 States colored deep red.

F**k this election cycle.
Logged
MIKESOWELL
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 535
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: February 29, 2016, 03:15:19 AM »

Bernie Sanders can't win......but come November, like the GOP found out in 1976, the Democrats will realize that they nominated the wrong candidate.
Logged
An American Tail: Fubart Goes West
Fubart Solman
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,746
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: February 29, 2016, 03:20:30 AM »


Oh great. So Bernie won't even win the 4 States he might have had a chance in. And we're going to get a boring-ass primary map with 45 to 48 States colored deep red.

Well, it's better than 49 states being red. I think he can pull off a victory somewhere other than Vermont tomorrow. I'm hoping he stays in until Maine goes on Sunday.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.052 seconds with 13 queries.