Democratic Super Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)

[Fusionmunster]

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.

The hate Obama --> They hate Hillary.

[Boston Bread]

Speaking of OK, Sanders has taken all but one county!

[/]

Still waiting for a Clinton call in MA...

Just get the pain over with

[IceSpear]

Bernie really needs MA. The delegate math was rough enough regardless, but losing there would just be salt in the wound and a knockout blow.

[This account no longer in use.]

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.

Surprisingly enough, Conservadems usually prefer Sanders.

[YPestis25]

https://twitter.com/DecisionDeskHQ/status/704862252361392128
Y'all, Decision Desk has called MA for Clinton.

I think she'll win here, but I'm a bit skeptical of DDHQ after their Iowa call.

[Boston Bread]

Unlike every other state, Sanders is leading in CO's suburbs. That's a great sign for him there.

[Antonio the Sixth]

Why doesn't CNN have a map for Minnesota? Those early results with 1% are making me nervous...

[morgieb]

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.

Mostly it's a protest vote against Clinton and Obama rather than a vote for Bernie.

[RaphaelDLG]

Bernie really needs MA. The delegate math was rough enough regardless, but losing there would just be salt in the wound and a knockout blow.

Does not look good for us.  Even if he wins MN and CO, the stories tomorrow about losing MA and getting murdered in delegates will make dumber Sanders supporters give up.

[cowboys5xsbs]

Look like Hillary might take Minneosta huge blow to Sanders

[Sorenroy]

Speaking of OK, Sanders has taken all but one county!

And that county has swung around 20-25 points towards Sanders since polls started to come in (early voting VS voting that day). With 30% of the votes left, perhaps a strong showing could force Clinton below 50% or even get Sanders the win (wishful thinking, I know).

[Citizen (The) Doctor]

According to the NYT map 30 percent of precincts in Boston are still out, Worcester isn't in yet either.

[Gass3268]

Bernie really needs MA. The delegate math was rough enough regardless, but losing there would just be salt in the wound and a knockout blow.

It's bad, but I wouldn't call it a knockout blow. There ares some decent states coming for him.

That being said, Boston only has 67 precincts left and there is a lot out there left in Sanders land. I feel like this is going to be a lot like Iowa.

[Sorenroy]

Look like Hillary might take Minnesota huge blow to Sanders

The only reason she is winning Minnesota is because the State map for the NYT is wrong. Look at the CD map (click the state map) and you'll see the exact opposite results.

[Shadows]

Winning MA or loosing would make no difference in delegates. Ok is good, Colo & MN I hope he wins, those would add delegates - Mass won't make a huge difference as it will be a very narrow loss.

It is psychological & momentum related - 5 states is better than 4 especially when you add Mass to it, looks & sounds better - Especially considering it is such a liberal state!

[Xing]

There's something fishy going on in MN. The county map shows Sanders winning several districts by a nearly 2 to 1 margin, while the vote total is still stuck at Clinton 61-45...

[Citizen (The) Doctor]

What's going on in Worcester right now? I haven't seen any returns on the NYT map.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Winning MA or loosing would make no difference in delegates.

Correct, there's an even number of delegates in both the statewide pools, so a close win means an even split there.

[Figueira]

We need to dispel with this fiction that the media doesn't know what they're doing by not calling MA. They know exactly what they're doing. Things look good for Clinton, and I think she'll most likely win but the map isn't like anything I've ever seen, so I can see why they're being careful here.

[Gass3268]

There's something fishy going on in MN. The county map shows Sanders winning several districts by a nearly 2 to 1 margin, while the vote total is still stuck at Clinton 61-45...

Data is messed up.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

We need to dispel with this fiction that the media doesn't know what they're doing by not calling MA. They know exactly what they're doing. Things look good for Clinton, and I think she'll most likely win but the map isn't like anything I've ever seen, so I can see why they're being careful here.

And they're doing something a little more scientific than "George, have you seen this map before? Who won that time?"

[Gass3268]

Sanders won Watertown and Quincy in MA. I really don't know what's going on here.

[defe07]

How is Bernie doing so well in OK? I was of the understanding OK Dems were fairly conservative.

Surprisingly enough, Conservadems usually prefer Sanders.

Maybe conservadems could help bernie win states like nd, sd, ut, ak, mt, id, wv and ks?

[yourelection]

Winning MA or loosing would make no difference in delegates.

Correct, there's an even number of delegates in both the statewide pools, so a close win means an even split there.

That's correct. Sanders wins will not give him a delegate advantage. Clinton will rack up delegates from her southern state wins, though.