MI-NBC News/Marist: Sanders destroys Trump/Cruz, Clinton leads too

[Tender Branson]

...

President Obama's approval rating in Michigan stands at 50 percent among registered voters.

...

The NBC/WSJ/Marist poll was conducted March 1-3 among 2,229 registered voters (which has a margin of error of plus-minus 2.1 percentage points), 546 likely Democratic primary voters (plus-minus 4.2 percentage points) and 482 likely Republican primary voters (plus-minus 4.5 percentage points).

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2016-election/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-hold-big-leads-michigan-poll-n532576

[Frozen Sky Ever Why]

B-B-BUT WORKING CLASS WHITE BLUE COLLAR REAGAN DEMOCRATS WILL PROPEL TRUMP TO VICTORY IN MI!! HE DOESN'T NEED FL!!!11!

Trump is solidly ahead in FL. It's VA where he seems to be in trouble.

[Cruzcrew]

BUT TRUMP DOESNT NEED FLORID. HES GOING TO FLIP PENNSYLVANIA AND MICHIGAN TO MAKE UP FOR IT

[EliteLX]

"LOLOL CANT WAIT UNTIL PRESIDENT TRUMP ROLLS OVER FL PA OH AND EVEN MI!"

You scrubs lol. Enjoy barely even taking North Carolina.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Trump is gonna the way of Romney

[pbrower2a]

Trump is gonna the way of Romney

Worse -- far worse! Take a good look at 2012. Mitt Romney came close to defeating an above-average incumbent President. I'm tempted to believe that he wins more electoral votes than Trump should he run Third Party or Independent.

I think Romney would have a chance in this election.

........

With Michigan this far out of contention for Trump, even Indiana will not be safe for him.

Obama approval is at 50% in Michigan.

[Xing]

Democrats are winning in an early polls in Michigan!? Looks like Michigan will be a D+30 state in the GE.

[pbrower2a]

Strongest D performances ever in Michigan:

Johnson 66, Goldwater 33 -- 1964
Obama 57, McCain 41 -- 2008
FDR 56, Landon 39 -- 1936
Obama 54, Romney 45 -- 2012
Clinton 52, Dole 38, Perot 9 -- 1996
FDR 52, Hoover 44 -- 1932
Kennedy 51, Nixon 49 -- 1960
FDR 49.56, Willkie 49.85 -- 1944

I don't quite know where to put Clinton 43, Bush 36, Perot 19 in 1992.

Barring a boring landslide in November, 57-41 for a Democrat is the max-out for any Democrat in 2016.

PPP is polling Ohio this weekend, and this poll suggests that the only Republican who has a chance in November in Ohio is John Kasich.

Michigan is about D+5 now, about like Connecticut and Maryland.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

If MI is this strong for Clinton,  then Pa should be clearly good fpr Clinton as well. Dems are doing well in CO & MI, two states needed.

[pbrower2a]

The polls for Pennsylvania are old -- from December, when Hillary Clinton was reeling in all polls due to the run-up to the investigation of the private server and Benghazi.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

I know, the Pennsylvania senate race is gonna get comPetitive, too.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

[Clarko95 📚💰📈]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

[Clarko95 📚💰📈]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

[IceSpear]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

Uh, per RCP, McCain was leading in March...

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

Uh, per RCP, McCain was leading in March...

Only briefly. Obama led for most of March and most of 2008. The idea that March polls don't matter is ridiculous.

[IceSpear]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

Uh, per RCP, McCain was leading in March...

Only briefly. Obama led for most of March and most of 2008. The idea that March polls don't matter is ridiculous.

The fact that McCain led at any point proves they're worthless.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

Uh, per RCP, McCain was leading in March...

Only briefly. Obama led for most of March and most of 2008. The idea that March polls don't matter is ridiculous.

The fact that McCain led at any point proves they're worthless.

Any inconvenient fact is worthless now?

[Ebsy]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Obama did similarly to what the March polls showed.

Uh, per RCP, McCain was leading in March...

Only briefly. Obama led for most of March and most of 2008. The idea that March polls don't matter is ridiculous.

The fact that McCain led at any point proves they're worthless.

Any inconvenient fact is worthless now?

Well, you see, in March of 2012, all indications were pointing to moderate turnout.

[pbrower2a]

Bernie just mentioned his 22 point lead in the debate.

You've been posting on this forum for 12 years and you still cannot understand that early polls mean nothing.

Early polls can say much, such as

(1) that a candidate has serious weaknesses that can make him irrelevant.
(2) now some states are oriented in partisan politics.
(3) results of events.
(4) collapses.

All are big deals.

 

[Ljube]

Primary results tonight show that Michigan is going to be very close in a Clinton vs. TRUMP general. We can safely say that TRUMP will pick up Bernie's working class whites.

[Amenhotep Bakari-Sellers]

Its gonna be close, but ad 2004 showed us, its a D+4 state .

[pbrower2a]

Primary results tonight show that Michigan is going to be very close in a Clinton vs. TRUMP general. We can safely say that TRUMP will pick up Bernie's working class whites.

No, you can't say that safely, at least yet.

I expect Hillary Clinton  to do everything possible to solidify the working-class white votes that Sanders got that Obama could not. She needs a coalition for victory, and she will need those Sanders voters to win election, flip the Senate, and maybe even flip the House.

Obama did horribly among working-class white voters, especially in the South. Maybe that's because he is... well, you know.

[Ljube]

Primary results tonight show that Michigan is going to be very close in a Clinton vs. TRUMP general. We can safely say that TRUMP will pick up Bernie's working class whites.

No, you can't say that safely, at least yet.

I expect Hillary Clinton  to do everything possible to solidify the working-class white votes that Sanders got that Obama could not. She needs a coalition for victory, and she will need those Sanders voters to win election, flip the Senate, and maybe even flip the House.

Obama did horribly among working-class white voters, especially in the South. Maybe that's because he is... well, you know.

But he did very well with the working class whites in the North. She is just doing badly with them.

That's what I have been telling you for the last six months or so. She will do worse with the working class whites in the North than Obama. And that's where the working class whites actually count.