Pinellas and Pasco Counties
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 09:12:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Pinellas and Pasco Counties
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Pinellas and Pasco Counties  (Read 889 times)
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 02, 2017, 04:49:08 PM »

Why did both counties swing GOP in 2016? Aren't they mostly suburban?
Logged
Sumner 1868
tara gilesbie
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,058
United States
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2017, 05:52:20 PM »

Drumpf won most suburbs. I don't know why people ignore that.
Logged
Tintrlvr
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,315


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2017, 06:30:10 PM »

"Suburbs" didn't swing towards Clinton. Wealthy, highly educated and economically dynamic suburbs, especially those that are relatively young, swung towards Clinton. Pasco and Pinellas Counties are none of these. They're mid-market, low-education areas heavy on elderly voters with little economic vitality beyond the servicing of retirees. Also, both are heavily white (especially, in the case of Pinellas County, for a county that contains a mid-sized city with a large minority population).
Logged
VPH
vivaportugalhabs
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,694
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.13, S: -0.17

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 02, 2017, 10:05:15 PM »

"Suburbs" didn't swing towards Clinton. Wealthy, highly educated and economically dynamic suburbs, especially those that are relatively young, swung towards Clinton. Pasco and Pinellas Counties are none of these. They're mid-market, low-education areas heavy on elderly voters with little economic vitality beyond the servicing of retirees. Also, both are heavily white (especially, in the case of Pinellas County, for a county that contains a mid-sized city with a large minority population).
Ahh, I wasn't aware they were lower education areas.
Logged
Arbitrage1980
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 770
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2017, 02:44:55 AM »

Trump won suburbs by 5 points; Romney won them by 2. Most suburbs are not affluent. Where Trump lost the most ground compared to Romney were the upper crust areas made up of highly educated whites making $200K+: Seattle burbs, SF bay area, san diego county, Chicago north shore burbs, northern Virginia, Westchester county New York, Fairfield county Connecticut, Boston suburbs. But with the exception of VA, none of those are in swing states, so Trump lost popular votes without sacrificing anything in the electoral college.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 12 queries.