Democratic Ides of March Tuesday results thread (first polls close at 7pm ET)

[Landslide Lyndon]

When are they going to post their results the last 100 Illinois precincts?

And why the hell Missouri is still uncalled when the votes are all in?

The possibility of a recount along with the lack of clarity regarding some of the results out of Jackson County. I think most of the media outlets are waiting for the Missouri SOS to certify the results.

I think the current numbers were released by Missouri's SoS as final and official results.

[ElectionsGuy]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

[Joe Republic]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Quite the opposite I'd dare say ...

[IceSpear]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Not to mention these same people gloat about wins in Kansas, Nebraska, and most offensively, OKLAHOMA.

[Landslide Lyndon]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Well, of course he does. Wasn't Hillary after all endorsed by David Duke?

[seb_pard]

http://imgur.com/RMZ9WS6

Chicago results by precinct in the democratic primary.

[Hydera]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Not to mention these same people gloat about wins in Kansas, Nebraska, and most offensively, OKLAHOMA.

1. BERNIE IS WINNING THE SWING STATES!!! (Like Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma is a swing state in the GE)

2. Who cares if Hillary won Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina? Bernie should get the nomination because he won Michigan and New hampshire!!!

[RI]

http://imgur.com/RMZ9WS6

Chicago results by precinct in the democratic primary.

2008, for comparison:

[Zache]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Yep.



These guys have since apologized because the implication that the largely black primary voters were Confederates didn't go over too well.

[IceSpear]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

I've seen anti-Hillary people constantly highlight her strength in the Confederacy, with all the negative connotations that implies.  As if the typical voter who longs for the Confederacy and everything that entails is voting in the Democratic primaries anyway.

Not to mention these same people gloat about wins in Kansas, Nebraska, and most offensively, OKLAHOMA.

1. BERNIE IS WINNING THE SWING STATES!!! (Like Kansas, Nebraska, Oklahoma is a swing state in the GE)

2. Who cares if Hillary won Iowa, Nevada, Ohio, Florida, Virginia and North Carolina? Bernie should get the nomination because he won Michigan and New hampshire!!!

It's even funnier when you consider the fact that, aside from possibly NV, NH and MI are the two most Democratic-friendly of all those.

[ElectionsGuy]

Are there any racial/ethnic tensions between Hispanics and blacks in Chicago? With the massive segregation and voting for opposite candidates both times in a row makes me wonder.

[Blue3]

Democrats voting in the former confederacy are mostly the descendants of Slaves...

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sanders concedes Missouri.

http://wtop.com/elections/2016/03/sanders-concedes-missouri-democratic-primary-clinton-wins/

[Mr. Morden]

Got this off Twitter...in the Chicago precincts that are majority white, higher income meant more support for Clinton.  In majority black precincts, it was reversed:

[platypeanArchcow]

Are there any racial/ethnic tensions between Hispanics and blacks in Chicago? With the massive segregation and voting for opposite candidates both times in a row makes me wonder.

Not as far as I know, though the only ones I know in either group are young activist types.  The Hispanics mostly settled in former white ethnic neighborhoods which were less destroyed by urban renewal than a lot of the black ones -- I think this explains the segregation between the two more than any kind of mutual dislike.

IIRC Chuy Garcia (the mayoral candidate who ran against Rahm) actively supported Bernie.

[An American Tail: Fubart Goes West]

The Former Confederacy, Democratic Primaries 2016

Clinton: 5,071,752 (65.9%)
Sanders: 2,459,613 (31.9%)
Other: 170,369 (2.2%)

Im surprised that Other did so poorly. I would have guessed it was a bit higher, maybe 3% or so.

[Landslide Lyndon]

WTF is going on with Illinois?

[Ebsy]

WTF is going on with Illinois?

Are you referring to the still outstanding precincts?

[Torie]

http://imgur.com/RMZ9WS6

Chicago results by precinct in the democratic primary.

2008, for comparison:

The map in 2012 was almost the reverse! That is what happens, when the coalitions flip. In 2008, Obama got the black and the majority of the white vote in Chicago, while Hillary got the Hispanics, and this time Bernie pinched the Hispanics from Hillary, while Berne "gave" to Hillary in exchange the blacks and most of the whites. Not a very good bargain for Bernie.

[Landslide Lyndon]

WTF is going on with Illinois?

Are you referring to the still outstanding precincts?

AP shows that the precincts are all in but they have Sanders at 38% and Willie Wilson at 11%.

[This account no longer in use.]

WTF is going on with Illinois?

Are you referring to the still outstanding precincts?

AP shows that the precincts are all in but they have Sanders at 38% and Willie Wilson at 11%.

Wilmentum?