fair enough. I'm tired so I'll drop it. not the part about this "sex-positive" schtick passing itself off as feminism, but the part about arguing with you and others over what is feminism. still, if they really were about egalitarianism, then why not just drop the BS and call themselves Egalitarianists, or Gender-Equalists, or ANYTHING besides feminists (which puts many of us in mind of the man-hating bulldykes and bitter old dumped- or cheated-on bitches we all have known from time to time)?
Probably because a good chunk of the U.S. population has no idea what egalitarianism is.
And a good chunk would have no idea what feminism is if they had not adopted such a name.
What's in a name? The fact is, they adopted a woman-centered name because it was women who historically needed to be pulled up. It's simply historical. Feminism is the doctrine of equality by gender.
Btw, I voted negative, but it's really a mixed bag. It's constructive when it speaks out against patriarchial religious nutcases who scream bloody murder every time a woman shows a little leg. It's counterproductive when it makes men see physical attributes only and be blind to the humanity and non-sexual contributions of women.