Will Hillary be indicted?

[standwrand]

idk but Rush Limbaugh actually made a good point that the Senate should make a deal with Obama to indict Hillary and the Repubs would confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/273353-rush-to-gop-trade-garland-nomination-for-clinton-indictment

[Beet]

No, she won't be indicted, but those of you counting on "Obama's DOJ" to cover her ass know nothing about AG Loretta Lynch. She is extremely objective, tough and professional, and is keeping the investigation a black box from the WH. She rebuked Josh Earnest for even making a glittering generality about the case. She has prosecuted Democratic and Republican politicians before; being in high places doesn't protect you from her. If the merits warrant an indictment I have no doubt it will happen.

[The Other Castro]

idk but Rush Limbaugh actually made a good point that the Senate should make a deal with Obama to indict Hillary and the Repubs would confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee

...what?

[DavidB.]

idk but Rush Limbaugh actually made a good point that the Senate should make a deal with Obama to indict Hillary and the Repubs would confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee

lmao

[IceSpear]

idk but Rush Limbaugh actually made a good point that the Senate should make a deal with Obama to indict Hillary and the Repubs would confirm Obama's SCOTUS nominee

Is he back on OxyContin?

[SillyAmerican]

No, she won't be indicted, but those of you counting on "Obama's DOJ" to cover her ass know nothing about AG Loretta Lynch. She is extremely objective, tough and professional, and is keeping the investigation a black box from the WH. She rebuked Josh Earnest for even making a glittering generality about the case. She has prosecuted Democratic and Republican politicians before; being in high places doesn't protect you from her. If the merits warrant an indictment I have no doubt it will happen.

Based on the AG's treatment of Lois Lerner and other IRS officials, your statement is extremely laughable.

[Shadows]

New Revelation: Clinton Knew of Blackberry Security Concerns
...................................

Newly released emails reveal Hillary Clinton was made aware of security concerns over her Blackberry when she became secretary of state.

..........................
One month after Clinton's request was denied, she began using a private email account on her Blackberry phone to exchange messages containing sensitive information.

.................
http://www1.cbn.com/cbnnews/politics/2016/March/New-Revelation-Clinton-Knew-of-Blackberry-Security-Concerns

[Shadows]

Hillary Clinton sent at least three dozen emails during seven different trips to China, Vietnam and Russia as secretary of state, a Daily Caller investigation reveals.

Communicating through a personal email account, which Clinton had synced up to a private email server and a non-government-issued BlackBerry, put the Democratic presidential candidate’s communications at risk, especially in nations with robust spy agencies and government-owned telecoms companies like China and Russia, a cyber security specialist tells TheDC.
...............................
...............................

http://dailycaller.com/2016/03/16/investigation-hillary-sent-dozens-of-emails-on-her-blackberry-from-russia-and-china-raising-risk-profile/

[Beet]

Anyone have access to the Judicial Watch documents?

These revelations show a few things

- Hillary wanted a government-issued device. There was no original intention to evade regulations by using a personal device. A personal device was not her first choice.

- Hillary respected government rules prohibiting personal devices from being brought into secure areas, even though it was very inconvenient for her. That was the genesis of the request to begin with. This is inconsistent with a cavalier attitude.

- Hillary's e-mail device situation was no secret at State or with the NSA. There was no conspiracy to hide the fact that she was using a personal BB. (Millions of people saw it, in fact.)

- Hillary's predecessor Rice and many of Rice's aides received waivers to bring personal devices into secured areas, implying they also used personal devices for work-related business (as we separately know is true for the aides' e-mails).

[°Leprechaun]

Maybe she should be indicted to tell her supporters to punch Sanders' supporters in the face.
Oh wait a minute that was Trump, wasn't it? Never mind.

[IceSpear]

- Hillary's e-mail device situation was no secret at State or with the NSA. There was no conspiracy to hide the fact that she was using a personal BB. (Millions of people saw it, in fact.)

This is how we know it's pure politics and a faux scandal. If people were oh so concerned about the security implications and whatnot, we would've heard about it from 2009-2014. EVERYBODY KNEW, AND NOBODY CARED! Until she ran for president and the NYT and the rest of the media needed a faux scandal to endlessly pound on for right wing clicks and to ensure a horse race.

[Suburbia]

No. If she is, they should hurry up with a report. If she's president,  she won't either because Comey answers to her.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

The fact that Robert Rubin was not indicted shows that rules don't apply to the Clintons or their associates.

http://fortune.com/2016/03/13/robert-rubin-financial-crisis-commission-justice-department/

[All Along The Watchtower]

The fact that Robert Rubin was not indicted shows that rules don't apply to the Clintons or their associates.

http://fortune.com/2016/03/13/robert-rubin-financial-crisis-commission-justice-department/

lmao

[Xing]

No, though I'm sure that the Hillary haters will immediately accuse the FBI of bias/being bribed by the Clintons when the investigation is over.

[DrScholl]

It seems like another one of these threads pop up every time the delegate math improves for Clinton.

[Shadows]

As I explained in this column in January, one of the most controversial of Ms. Clinton’s emails released by the State Department under judicial order was one sent on June 8, 2011 to the Secretary of State by Sidney Blumenthal, Hillary’s unsavoryfriend and confidant who was running a private intelligence service for Ms. Clinton. This email contains an amazingly detailed assessment of events in Sudan, specifically a coup being plotted by top generals in that war-torn country. Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from a top-ranking source with direct access to Sudan’s top military and intelligence officials, and recounted a high-level meeting that had taken place only twenty-four hours before.
..............................
.............................
Currently serving NSA officials have told me they have no doubt that Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from their reports. “It’s word-for-word, verbatim copying,” one of them explained. “In one case, an entire paragraph was lifted from an NSA report” that was classified Top Secret / Special Intelligence.

How Sid Blumenthal got his hands on this information is the key question, and there’s no firm answer yet. The fact that he was able to take four separate highly classified NSA reports – none of which he was supposed to have any access to – and pass the details of them to Hillary Clinton via email only hours after NSA released them in Top Secret / Special Intelligence channels, indicates something highly unusual—as well as illegal—was going on.
......................................................................

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/03/18/nsa-how-did-gamma-compartment-info-end-up-in-hillarys-unclassified-e-mail/

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

As I explained in this column in January, one of the most controversial of Ms. Clinton’s emails released by the State Department under judicial order was one sent on June 8, 2011 to the Secretary of State by Sidney Blumenthal, Hillary’s unsavoryfriend and confidant who was running a private intelligence service for Ms. Clinton. This email contains an amazingly detailed assessment of events in Sudan, specifically a coup being plotted by top generals in that war-torn country. Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from a top-ranking source with direct access to Sudan’s top military and intelligence officials, and recounted a high-level meeting that had taken place only twenty-four hours before.
..............................
.............................
Currently serving NSA officials have told me they have no doubt that Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from their reports. “It’s word-for-word, verbatim copying,” one of them explained. “In one case, an entire paragraph was lifted from an NSA report” that was classified Top Secret / Special Intelligence.

How Sid Blumenthal got his hands on this information is the key question, and there’s no firm answer yet. The fact that he was able to take four separate highly classified NSA reports – none of which he was supposed to have any access to – and pass the details of them to Hillary Clinton via email only hours after NSA released them in Top Secret / Special Intelligence channels, indicates something highly unusual—as well as illegal—was going on.
......................................................................

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/03/18/nsa-how-did-gamma-compartment-info-end-up-in-hillarys-unclassified-e-mail/

One of the reports he got information from wasn't just top secret but was a special access program.

http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-has-an-nsa-problem/

[SillyAmerican]

As I explained in this column in January, one of the most controversial of Ms. Clinton’s emails released by the State Department under judicial order was one sent on June 8, 2011 to the Secretary of State by Sidney Blumenthal, Hillary’s unsavoryfriend and confidant who was running a private intelligence service for Ms. Clinton. This email contains an amazingly detailed assessment of events in Sudan, specifically a coup being plotted by top generals in that war-torn country. Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from a top-ranking source with direct access to Sudan’s top military and intelligence officials, and recounted a high-level meeting that had taken place only twenty-four hours before.
..............................
.............................
Currently serving NSA officials have told me they have no doubt that Mr. Blumenthal’s information came from their reports. “It’s word-for-word, verbatim copying,” one of them explained. “In one case, an entire paragraph was lifted from an NSA report” that was classified Top Secret / Special Intelligence.

How Sid Blumenthal got his hands on this information is the key question, and there’s no firm answer yet. The fact that he was able to take four separate highly classified NSA reports – none of which he was supposed to have any access to – and pass the details of them to Hillary Clinton via email only hours after NSA released them in Top Secret / Special Intelligence channels, indicates something highly unusual—as well as illegal—was going on.
......................................................................

http://hotair.com/archives/2016/03/18/nsa-how-did-gamma-compartment-info-end-up-in-hillarys-unclassified-e-mail/

One of the reports he got information from wasn't just top secret but was a special access program.

http://observer.com/2016/03/hillary-has-an-nsa-problem/

In which case it sounds as though Sid Blumenthal should be a focus of the investigation, yes?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[MK]

Obama want allow it.   

NO

[Landslide Lyndon]

I see this thread has become a meeting point for an assortment of right and left wing nuts to compare notes on their Clinton Derangement Syndromes.

[SillyAmerican]

I see this thread has become a meeting point for an assortment of right and left wing nuts to compare notes on their Clinton Derangement Syndromes.

How is the handling of sensitive NSA information a note about Clinton Derangement Syndromes? Are you saying the information in the article is incorrect? Or are you saying that the information should be ignored?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

Even if Hillary did something warranting an indictment, it won't happen during presidential election year.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Even if Hillary did something warranting an indictment, it won't happen during presidential election year.

No? The FBI will be political now?

[Shadows]

Even if Hillary did something warranting an indictment, it won't happen during presidential election year.

No? The FBI will be political now?

Obama's DOJ won't allow it - But the thing is news will spread that FBI recommends X or Y & Obama is protecting her.

In that she would no longer be able to be a nominee for POTUS as that would permanently damage the Dem party & hand over the election the GOP.

So her Presidency would be over & Biden or someone else has to drafted in! Either ways if the FBI finds her guilty, she has a lot to lose