Candidate Support Breakdown by Motivation (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? April 30, 2024, 04:15:39 AM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

Election Archive

2016 U.S. Presidential Election

Candidate Support Breakdown by Motivation (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

Which of the following statements best describes your voting intentions?

#1 I am voting against Donald Trump		34 (29.1%)
#2 I am voting against Hillary Clinton		10 (8.5%)
#3 I am voting for Donald Trump		12 (10.3%)
#4 I am voting for Hillary Clinton		41 (35%)
#5 I am not going to vote		0 (0%)
#6 I am going to vote, but none of these options apply to me		13 (11.1%)
#7 I am not able to vote		7 (6%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 117

Author

Topic: Candidate Support Breakdown by Motivation (Read 1416 times)

°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,184

	Re: Candidate Support Breakdown by Motivation « on: March 18, 2016, 11:15:23 PM »
	« edited: March 18, 2016, 11:19:07 PM by qoiioqa »

~~Neither Clinton nor Trump have enough delegates yet. This poll is bad.~~

Too early to decide, since the primaries aren't over. No reason for me to decide until we know who the nominees are.

Logged

°Leprechaun
tmcusa2
Junior Chimp

Posts: 8,184

Re: Candidate Support Breakdown by Motivation

« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2016, 11:19:47 PM »

Quote from: Ebowed on March 18, 2016, 11:16:43 PM

Quote from: qoiioqa on March 18, 2016, 11:15:23 PM

Neither Clinton nor Trump have enough delegates yet. This poll is bad.

Quote from: Ebowed on March 18, 2016, 11:11:28 PM

Assuming a general election between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, which of these statements best describes your voting intentions this November?

ok you're forgiven then

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 16 queries.