Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wow this forum hates Bernie even more then Washington does.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wow this forum hates Bernie even more then Washington does.

The guy couldn't do it in the south. He couldn't do it in the upper Midwest aside from a fluke in Michigan. His appeal is limited to caucus states, parts of the northeast, and Dixiecrats who always vote R in the general. He has no winning coalition and needs to drop out if he cares about stopping Donald Trump.

Ok David Brock. Unfortunately for you he is not dropping out anytime soon. I don't know how staying in the race is going to hurt the Democrats chances against Trump, all I know is Democratic turnout will probably be super low with Hillary as the nominee. Even though people are voting for Clinton they like Sanders as well. (Not as much hate as this forum)

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wow this forum hates Bernie even more then Washington does.

The guy couldn't do it in the south. He couldn't do it in the upper Midwest aside from a fluke in Michigan. His appeal is limited to caucus states, parts of the northeast, and Dixiecrats who always vote R in the general. He has no winning coalition and needs to drop out if he cares about stopping Donald Trump.

Ok David Brock. Unfortunately for you he is not dropping out anytime soon. I don't know how staying in the race is going to hurt the Democrats chances against Trump, all I know is Democratic turnout will probably be super low with Hillary as the nominee. Even though people are voting for Clinton they like Sanders as well. (Not as much hate as this forum)

But what is the point of Sanders staying in when he has no chance of being nominated barring a Hillary indictment or death? The primary is no longer a legitimate contest of ideas, since only one candidate, Clinton, has a chance of winning. All it is doing is making it harder for Hillary to pivot to the center, which will be needed to defeat TRUMP, who is not necessarily a pushover in the general.

The spread is 1,147 to 830 in pledged delegates with 2,383 needed for the nomination so it's an uphill battle but not as impossible as you suggest. Also pivot to the center? I thought she was the progressive that was going to take on wall street (lol) just like she did in 2007 when she wove her finger at them and told them to knock it off. Anyone who supports her and believes she is going to fight for a progressive agenda instead of listening to her rich donors are suckers.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Wow this forum hates Bernie even more then Washington does.

The guy couldn't do it in the south. He couldn't do it in the upper Midwest aside from a fluke in Michigan. His appeal is limited to caucus states, parts of the northeast, and Dixiecrats who always vote R in the general. He has no winning coalition and needs to drop out if he cares about stopping Donald Drumpf.

Ok David Brock. Unfortunately for you he is not dropping out anytime soon. I don't know how staying in the race is going to hurt the Democrats chances against Drumpf, all I know is Democratic turnout will probably be super low with Hillary as the nominee. Even though people are voting for Clinton they like Sanders as well. (Not as much hate as this forum)

Really? The same Hilary that's consistently winning the Democratic primary vote as Sanders wins independent voters? Good call!

Man you Sandernistas are the worst. My father is one of you and you're truly naive enough to believe that your Socialist leader is going to come anywhere near the oval office. Newsflash! He's got higher favorability because no one knows anything about him yet. Just wait until the GOP slime machine finds out Bernie once kicked a kitten while having an affair with his maid while under the influence of LSD in the 1980s.

LOL WHAT?!?! Great, another idiot.

There has never been a case in the admittedly short history of the modern presidential primary process that a candidate has closed a 300+ delegate gap.

This election has proved that conventional wisdom of past primaries should be thrown out the window.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Not on the Democratic side. Despite what you may believe, there has been little to nothing revolutionary about this primary battle.

Wasn't this primary supposed to be Al Gore 2.0? I remember a few posters comparing Sanders to Bill Bradly who won NO states.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Let's DISPEL the MYTH that Clinton is inevitable, once and for all.
Sanders can win if people vote for him. Remember Clinton supporters have been saying that she was inevitable before the first vote was even cast. There are millions and millions of people who have not voted. Clinton supporters know that she is not inevitable, if they believed otherwise they would stay home and not vote in the primaries. They will not do that, because in their hearts they know they're wrong.

Well, it doesn't look like he's going to win Arizona (or not by much at best), and he won't win in New York. In fact, he'd be lucky to lose only in a mini-landslide instead of a massive one.

The math here just doesn't add up. Impossible to deny this.

Don't ignore the west coast. Most of Clinton's best states are gone, he will be chipping away at that delegate lead slowly but surely.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Don't forget he has almost the entire establishment party against him. He has no Senators and six representatives behind him. His wins are impressive, if you ask me.

Yeah, it's astonishing how the Democratic party establishment refuses to support for President a guy who isn't a Democrat and who accuses them of being beholden to the moneyed interests.

Oh for God sakes he has always caucused with the Democrats. This attack is getting old.

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Lol at people that don't think money in politics is a problem.