Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 04:32:10 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Sanders not running out of money: He's on track to raise 50-60 Mio. $ in March  (Read 3850 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,572
United States


WWW
« on: March 19, 2016, 01:06:19 PM »
« edited: March 19, 2016, 01:10:16 PM by Frodo »

Wow this forum hates Bernie even more then Washington does.

The guy couldn't do it in the south. He couldn't do it in the upper Midwest aside from a fluke in Michigan. His appeal is limited to caucus states, parts of the northeast, and Dixiecrats who always vote R in the general. He has no winning coalition and needs to drop out if he cares about stopping Donald Trump.

Ok David Brock. Unfortunately for you he is not dropping out anytime soon. I don't know how staying in the race is going to hurt the Democrats chances against Trump, all I know is Democratic turnout will probably be super low with Hillary as the nominee. Even though people are voting for Clinton they like Sanders as well. (Not as much hate as this forum)

But what is the point of Sanders staying in when he has no chance of being nominated barring a Hillary indictment or death? The primary is no longer a legitimate contest of ideas, since only one candidate, Clinton, has a chance of winning. All it is doing is making it harder for Hillary to pivot to the center, which will be needed to defeat TRUMP, who is not necessarily a pushover in the general.

If Hillary Clinton continued to the bitter end in 2008 long after it was made apparent that Barack Obama would be the eventual nominee, why shouldn't Bernie Sanders?  

Besides, this extended primary season has been healthy for Hillary, and it is a lot more civil than the contest between her and Obama in 2008, to say nothing of the circus on the GOP side of the aisle.  I see more pros to Sanders staying in the race than cons. 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 11 queries.