Opinion of Ljube

[IceSpear]

Meh, I voted FF just for diversity's sake. It's interesting to have a Trump hack who isn't ironic or blatantly bigoted.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Meh, I voted FF just for diversity's sake. It's interesting to have a Trump hack who isn't ironic or blatantly bigoted.

At the least the bigots are consistent and logical. This guy has in the past week both argued that Trump is really a closet liberal and the right "true conservative" choice.

[they don't love you like i love you]

here's a great example of the truly amazing analysis this guy provides:

Trump tweets doctored photo ripped off WCPO.com

http://www.wcpo.com/news/political/trump-tweets-doctored-photo-ripped-off-wcpocom

Trump has been reduced to stealing pictures of African-American families and pretending they support him. And it's only early June. He's going to be lucky to get half of Romney's numbers with African-Americans.

lol no

I despise Trump, but he is not going to do worse than Romney with black voters. Trump is a bad fit for black voters, but Romney was an awful one. I predict that Trump will get around 9% of the black vote (compared to Romney's 6%). Romney's 6% is Trump's floor with African-Americans.

You are wrong! Trump is an excellent fit for black voters.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

Meh, I voted FF just for diversity's sake. It's interesting to have a Trump hack who isn't ironic or blatantly bigoted.

At the least the bigots are consistent and logical. This guy has in the past week both argued that Trump is really a closet liberal and the right "true conservative" choice.

Which he has been doing for months.

[Green Line]

FF, but very misguided.  He's in for a rude awakening next month.

[This account no longer in use.]

FF, but very misguided.  He's in for a rude awakening next month.

Consider this, Brown Line. I'll give you two scenarios:

a. Trump is nominated, loses presidential election to Hillary, Republicans make gains in 2018 and have a major chance at winning back the presidency in 2020.
b. Romney or whatever token establishment candidate is airlifted in at the convention, causing the already volatile Trump supporters to get even worse, with possibilities of riots. Due to this, Trump supporters don't turn out for Romney, handing the election to Clinton by a landslide, and their voices only get louder in 2020, virtually guaranteeing that a Trump-like candidate, if not Trump himself, is nominated and gives the Democrats four terms in a row.

Are you seriously daft enough to think that scenario B is better than scenario A?

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I honestly can't recall a single occasion of Ljube providing something of an actual substance.

[Green Line]

FF, but very misguided.  He's in for a rude awakening next month.

Consider this, Brown Line. I'll give you two scenarios:

a. Trump is nominated, loses presidential election to Hillary, Republicans make gains in 2018 and have a major chance at winning back the presidency in 2020.
b. Romney or whatever token establishment candidate is airlifted in at the convention, causing the already volatile Trump supporters to get even worse, with possibilities of riots. Due to this, Trump supporters don't turn out for Romney, handing the election to Clinton by a landslide, and their voices only get louder in 2020, virtually guaranteeing that a Trump-like candidate, if not Trump himself, is nominated and gives the Democrats four terms in a row.

Are you seriously daft enough to think that scenario B is better than scenario A?

If scenario A worked out the way you think it would, sure.  But It won't.  Trump will ruin the Republican brand with the LatinX for years to come, and the dumb Trumpeters will blame the election loss on people like me regardless of whether or not there is a coup.  Moderate independent swing voters will respect and thank Republicans for overthrowing Trump, and there will be a huge movement towards whoever that candidate is.  Whoever we put up, they will look good in comparison, and the Trump voters can go DIAF for all I care.

[Ljube]

If scenario A worked out the way you think it would, sure.  But It won't.  Trump will ruin the Republican brand with the LatinX for years to come, and the dumb Trumpeters will blame the election loss on people like me regardless of whether or not there is a coup.  Moderate independent swing voters will respect and thank Republicans for overthrowing Trump, and there will be a huge movement towards whoever that candidate is.  Whoever we put up, they will look good in comparison, and the Trump voters can go DIAF for all I care.

Obviously, a Democrat can be president forever, for all you care.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

A troglodyte who needs to get with the times.

[Maxwell]

I love how mad people get at his trolling. FF.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

I love how mad people get at his trolling. FF.

he's not a troll, just very dumb. he was the same way in 2012.

[HAnnA MArin County]

The antithesis of jfern. HP.

[Virginiá]

I honestly can't recall a single occasion of Ljube providing something of an actual substance.

He should find his way to Trump Tower and ask for for compensation for all his pro-Trump advocacy. He is very consistent and loyal!

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

I honestly can't recall a single occasion of Ljube providing something of an actual substance.

He should find his way to Trump Tower and ask for for compensation for all his pro-Trump advocacy. He is very consistent and loyal!

And very respectful. I can't recall a single occassion he forgot to type TRUMP in caps.

[This account no longer in use.]

The antithesis of jfern. HP.

But wouldn't the antithesis of Jfern be an FF?

[President of the great nation of 🏳️‍⚧️]

The antithesis of jfern. HP.

But wouldn't the antithesis of Jfern be an FF?

That's merely a technicality.

[°Leprechaun]

The antithesis of jfern. HP.

But wouldn't the antithesis of Jfern be an FF?

No.

[This account no longer in use.]

Well, 'antithesis' is defined as 'a person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something else.' Jfern is an HP, plain and simple. So wouldn't Jfern's antithesis be an FF.

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

Well, 'antithesis' is defined as 'a person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something else.' Jfern is an HP, plain and simple. So wouldn't Jfern's antithesis be an FF.

something something horseshoe theory

[RaphaelDLG]

If that guy is faking it, he deserves an Oscar

[IceSpear]

Well, 'antithesis' is defined as 'a person or thing that is the direct opposite of someone or something else.' Jfern is an HP, plain and simple. So wouldn't Jfern's antithesis be an FF.

The anthesis of jfern would be an an FF far right Republican (but registered independent) from Maine who will be voting for Trump despite being disappointed that Cruz lost.

[This account no longer in use.]

Don't take this thread too seriously, Ljube. It's obvious that you would have a 75% FF/25% HP rating if you were supporting Hillary Clinton.

Sure. His support of Trump is deeeeeeeeeeefinitely the only reason why people dislike him. That's exactly why everybody hates people like Sanchez.

[This account no longer in use.]

Believe me, that's not the only reason. I'm okay with him being a Trump supporter. I'm not okay with his absolutely ridiculous 'analysis'. You have to be a special kind of delusional to think that Trump will win even 20% of black voters, let alone 30%.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Believe me, that's not the only reason. I'm okay with him being a Trump supporter. I'm not okay with his absolutely ridiculous 'analysis'. You have to be a special kind of delusional to think that Trump will win even 20% of black voters, let alone 30%.

Is the #analysis on the 2016 board really that much better, though?

That he throws more sh!t onto a giant pile of sh!t is not an argument for him being a good poster.

My biggest problem with him is that he not only engages in poll unskewing, he does so with numbers he completely pulls out of his ass.