Who do you think will win the March 26th Primaries? (D)

[Joe Biden 2020]

Before reading this thread, I was going to put HI in Sanders's column, but most of you are saying lean Clinton.  So, I guess I'll tilt it to Clinton, as well.  I agree Sanders on the other two.

[RaphaelDLG]

FWIW betting markets suggest a Sanders sweep but have very, very little confidence about Hawaii.

[Former Senator Haslam2020]

Sanders sweep.

[MasterJedi]

Sanderistas could easily bully their way to victory in the undemocratic caucuses though.

Yes, because showing up to a caucus is totally bullying.

No but when you have a bunch of rabid foaming mouth children screaming at Clinton supporters it's human nature to go with the group and not be on the outside. That's why Clinton does better in primaries, secret ballot and Sanderistas can't bully them into going with what they don't want to.

[°Leprechaun]

Sanderistas could easily bully their way to victory in the undemocratic caucuses though.

Yes, because showing up to a caucus is totally bullying.

No but when you have a bunch of rabid foaming mouth children screaming at Clinton supporters it's human nature to go with the group and not be on the outside. That's why Clinton does better in primaries, secret ballot and Sanderistas can't bully them into going with what they don't want to.

If true, it also makes Clinton supporters look bad. They wouldn't cave in so easily if they were tougher. I'm not defending being a bully, but I think I have a valid point.

[Maxwell]

Sanderistas could easily bully their way to victory in the undemocratic caucuses though.

Yes, because showing up to a caucus is totally bullying.

No but when you have a bunch of rabid foaming mouth children screaming at Clinton supporters it's human nature to go with the group and not be on the outside. That's why Clinton does better in primaries, secret ballot and Sanderistas can't bully them into going with what they don't want to.

If true, it also makes Clinton supporters look bad. They wouldn't cave in so easily if they were tougher. I'm not defending being a bully, but I think I have a valid point.

That's not really a good point - I'm not saying I agree with MasterJedi's point that Sanders supporters are foaming at the mouth bullies, but you don't tell a kid who is getting bullied "lol get thicker skin".

[°Leprechaun]

So called "undemocratic caucuses" helps balance out the undemocratic super delegates.
The "Democratic" party establishment hasn't been very democratic in moving heaven and earth to keeping all third parties of the ballot, thereby giving voters a choice. The Republican establishment is just as bad.

[°Leprechaun]

Sanderistas could easily bully their way to victory in the undemocratic caucuses though.

Yes, because showing up to a caucus is totally bullying.

No but when you have a bunch of rabid foaming mouth children screaming at Clinton supporters it's human nature to go with the group and not be on the outside. That's why Clinton does better in primaries, secret ballot and Sanderistas can't bully them into going with what they don't want to.

If true, it also makes Clinton supporters look bad. They wouldn't cave in so easily if they were tougher. I'm not defending being a bully, but I think I have a valid point.

That's not really a good point - I'm not saying I agree with MasterJedi's point that Sanders supporters are foaming at the mouth bullies, but you don't tell a kid who is getting bullied "lol get thicker skin".

A poor analogy, these are adults not children and they aren't getting physically abused. I am not defending the caucus system. If someone shows up they should be prepared for this. When voters go to the polls in primary states, the establishment hacks hand out papers telling them how to vote, and these hacks expect people to follow their commands, as many do, like meek sheep. At least that is what happens where I live.

[°Leprechaun]

"There is no try there is only do", I guess Clinton supporters aren't exactly "master jedis" lol.

[°Leprechaun]

Anyway, this is all nonsense, because conservative Democrats are not always known for being all peace and love.

[This account no longer in use.]

Clinton sweep. Shortly after, Sanders will announce his openly white supremacist independent campaign.

[An American Tail: Fubart Goes West]

Screw it. Sanders sweep.

Kucinich got over 30% in Hawaii back in 2004.

I could see Sanders winning Hawaii with under 60%. Alaska will be like Utah and Idaho. Washington will nearly hit 70% for Sanders, but not quite.

[Ogre Mage]

Sanders wins Washington and Alaska, Clinton wins Hawaii.

[PresidentTRUMP]

2 of 3 to sanders but somehow with super delegates clinton ends up with a ton more lol

[Shadows]

There 142 odd delegates (101+25+16) - How is Sanders gonna end up with less ?

For Alaska people are saying 70-80%. But beyond 60% is difficult to predict IMO. If Sanders did a rally, we would have got 70%.

Tulsi Gabbard has put an amazing effort in Hawaii - Not sure if it will be enough to win - Clinton is actually investing in ads n a ground team there!

[Pragmatic Conservative]

Sanders sweeps Alaska and Washington, winning almost every county. While in Hawaii Sanders takes Maui County
and Clinton takes Hawaii County,Honolulu County and Kauai County
Not Sure:Kalawao County


Alaska
Sanders 67%
Clinton 33%

Washington
Sanders 60%
Clinton 40%

Hawaii
Clinton 53%
Sanders 47%