Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:37:04 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 27609 times)
Crumpets
Thinking Crumpets Crumpet
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,729
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.06, S: -6.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #100 on: March 26, 2016, 01:52:24 PM »

I wish I could be there to caucus today! Fortunately I sent in my surrogate form a couple of weeks ago.
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #101 on: March 26, 2016, 01:54:45 PM »

Clinton would need to be held under 15% (of the preference vote?) in order to not win any delegates.

I don't see how that is possible given that Sanders barely managed to do that in VT.
Logged
Lyin' Steve
SteveMcQueen
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,310


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #102 on: March 26, 2016, 01:56:33 PM »

My caucus was 3-1 for Bernie.  9% of people were uncommitted for god knows what reason.

I gave a speech for Clinton, but people kept interrupting me to say they couldn't hear even though I was shouting at the top of my lungs.  Oh well, you win some you lose some.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #103 on: March 26, 2016, 01:57:18 PM »

Clinton would need to be held under 15% (of the preference vote?) in order to not win any delegates.

I don't see how that is possible given that Sanders barely managed to do that in VT.

It has never happened to my mind in recent history between 2 competitive candidates - Not even people in their home states - Obama, Hillary, Bill, McCain, Bush  - No person not in a American Samoa type state has done it RECENTLY - I can't remember.

Vermont was an outlier & huge exception - Probably would not happen in the next 30-40 years among COMPETITIVE candidates
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #104 on: March 26, 2016, 01:57:39 PM »

70-30 would give Sanders about 40 more delegates than Clinton.  75-25 would be about 50.

Washington may be Sanders' best state as far as delegate gain goes.
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #105 on: March 26, 2016, 01:57:58 PM »

Washington is a state that was made for Bernie Sanders. Even if it was a primary, this would probably be one of his best states, but good for him that he's (supposedly) winning by so much. He needs a big delegate lead for today to start to close the gap in pledged delegates.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #106 on: March 26, 2016, 01:59:51 PM »

Well it helps that caucuses are designed to heavily disenfranchise wide swaths of the electorate. If this were a primary then Clinton would only be losing by 10% or so, I would guess. In 2008 Obama won the WA caucus by nearly 40%, but only won the primary by 6%.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #107 on: March 26, 2016, 02:00:24 PM »

Bernie is on track to bag 180-200 of the 290 delegates at stake in the next 3 weeks and cut Hillary's margin to around 150-200 (1.300 vs. 1.100) by Mid-April.

If it weren't for the stubborn superdelegates and minority voters, it would be a real race ...
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #108 on: March 26, 2016, 02:00:50 PM »

My caucus was 3-1 for Bernie.  9% of people were uncommitted for god knows what reason.

I gave a speech for Clinton, but people kept interrupting me to say they couldn't hear even though I was shouting at the top of my lungs.  Oh well, you win some you lose some.

Well, the same was true for me.
Logged
Matty
boshembechle
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,959


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #109 on: March 26, 2016, 02:01:50 PM »

caucuses started TWO HOURS ago and no results yet?

Baloney baloney
Logged
/
darthebearnc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,367
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #110 on: March 26, 2016, 02:01:50 PM »

Bernie is on track to bag 180-200 of the 290 delegates at stake in the next 3 weeks and cut Hillary's margin to around 150-200 (1.300 vs. 1.100) by Mid-April.

If it weren't for the stubborn superdelegates and minority voters, it would be a real race ...

Ugh, I just can't stand those minorities.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #111 on: March 26, 2016, 02:02:22 PM »

Well it helps that caucuses are designed to heavily disenfranchise wide swaths of the electorate. If this were a primary then Clinton would only be losing by 10% or so, I would guess. In 2008 Obama won the WA caucus by nearly 40%, but only won the primary by 6%.

How many times does it need to be repeated that the primary eight years ago was a beauty contest? Clinton would be doing marginally better in a primary, but it would not have been a single-digit race eight years ago. The result probably would've been similar to what it was in Oregon, almost 60-40.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #112 on: March 26, 2016, 02:03:30 PM »


No.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #113 on: March 26, 2016, 02:04:25 PM »
« Edited: March 26, 2016, 02:06:10 PM by Adam T »

Bernie is on track to bag 180-200 of the 290 delegates at stake in the next 3 weeks and cut Hillary's margin to around 150-200 (1.300 vs. 1.100) by Mid-April.

If it weren't for the stubborn superdelegates and minority voters, it would be a real race ...

Except that, as has been mentioned elsewhere, nearly all of Bernie Sanders' win have been in the caucus states and they're over after North Dakota (which itself is a convention and not a caucus.)

With rare exceptions I think Hillary Rodham Clinton will handily win all of the remaining primary states.

Edit: except for the Wyoming caucus on April 9.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,940


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #114 on: March 26, 2016, 02:04:42 PM »

Bernie is on track to bag 180-200 of the 290 delegates at stake in the next 3 weeks and cut Hillary's margin to around 150-200 (1.300 vs. 1.100) by Mid-April.

If it weren't for the stubborn superdelegates and minority voters, it would be a real race ...

Yeah if only the base of the Democratic Party weren't voting in the Democratic Party primaries, Bernie would have a shot!
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #115 on: March 26, 2016, 02:05:29 PM »

Record shattering turnout in Anchorage, Alaska. The fire marshal is getting mad.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,181
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #116 on: March 26, 2016, 02:06:16 PM »

Record shattering turnout in Anchorage, Alaska. The fire marshal is getting mad.

No caucus ever has record turnout ...

Not even 20% of people are voting in a caucus.
Logged
136or142
Adam T
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,434
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #117 on: March 26, 2016, 02:06:41 PM »

Record shattering turnout in Anchorage, Alaska. The fire marshal is getting mad.

He's mad at being anchored down in Anchorage.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,778


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #118 on: March 26, 2016, 02:12:30 PM »

Bernie's inched up in my twitter count to 78.8%. At 75.3% in King County. 91 precincts counted.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #119 on: March 26, 2016, 02:13:49 PM »

What are the chances of Bernie getting >70% in WA Cheesy
Logged
Dr. Arch
Arch
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,453
Puerto Rico


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #120 on: March 26, 2016, 02:16:06 PM »

If he can make margins this big in these states + CA + most of the remaining states -MD and NY, then we might be onto something.
Logged
The Other Castro
Castro2020
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,230
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #121 on: March 26, 2016, 02:16:19 PM »

What are the chances of Bernie getting >70% in WA Cheesy

Pretty decent odds at the moment.
Logged
dax00
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,422


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #122 on: March 26, 2016, 02:16:34 PM »

14 hours ago, I predicted Bernie would get about 72% in Washington. I see no reason to have my prediction deviate anyhow from 72%.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,600
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #123 on: March 26, 2016, 02:16:38 PM »

Pretty good chance it looks like.  I would guess a he would gain 40-60 delegates on Clinton from Washington if those numbers are accurate.
Logged
Shadows
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,956
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #124 on: March 26, 2016, 02:18:45 PM »

If he can make margins this big in these states + CA + most of the remaining states -MD and NY, then we might be onto something.

No-way he is making these margins other places. And honestly does not need to either. He needs 60%+ in CA & he will still get 6-7 big wins.

I don't think he can win but theoretically he has to beat her (maybe narrowly - not lose) in NY, PA, NJ, PR, MD which I don't see happening
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 ... 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 14 queries.