Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 12:27:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 32
Author Topic: Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)  (Read 27388 times)
Joe Biden 2020
BushOklahoma
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,921
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.77, S: 3.48

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #200 on: March 26, 2016, 03:37:01 PM »

When can Washington officially be called?
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #201 on: March 26, 2016, 03:37:35 PM »

You could probably find more Sanders opponents at a Sanders rally than the West Seattle Caucus... I'm sure some people just went for the lolz or to accompany friends.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #202 on: March 26, 2016, 03:38:04 PM »

98% in a 17th of Seattle, though? The last time I saw 98% anywhere on Atlas for an election result was FDR's numbers from South Carolina in 1930s era elections.

Just to show you I'm not freaking out though, it heartens me to see that Clinton has actually won a precinct (called "Silver Spurs"):

https://twitter.com/katherinelong/status/713796204912443393

It was a given that Sanders was going to crush Clinton in WA. Unless he cracks 80%, this isn't going to change the state of the race.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #203 on: March 26, 2016, 03:38:33 PM »


Probably once King comes in.
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #204 on: March 26, 2016, 03:39:11 PM »
« Edited: May 21, 2016, 03:48:29 PM by Alcon »

You could probably find more Sanders opponents at a Sanders rally than the West Seattle Caucus... I'm sure some people just went for the lolz or to accompany friends.

dude, Beet man, you do this with, like, every election.  Those aren't the right West Seattle numbers, and Clinton hit viability in most of our precincts (some of the most left-wing in Seattle), and even won a few of the older ones.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #205 on: March 26, 2016, 03:39:26 PM »

I am sick and tired of Sanders supporters underplaying their man's chances. If you thought it wouldn't change anything, you guys wouldn't be out there supporting him. He was supposed to win by 30 points. This is absurd.
Logged
YPestis25
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,376


Political Matrix
E: -4.65, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #206 on: March 26, 2016, 03:39:49 PM »

Clinton is doing well in many precincts in Seattle, running close. That coupled with the absentee & strong Clinton performances in major cities.

Who knows maybe Sanders would be in the 50's!


Where are you seeing this? Not saying you're wrong, but I'm curious what your source is.

A couple of random people saying Hillary did well in their precinct around 40% n so on. Seattle will having a bulk share of the votes, large population.

Maybe those are outliers - Some 65-75 for Sanders outside Washington as well. I am just a bit negative I guess expecting the worst!

Thanks for the reply!

Also, so help me if CNN says "Key Race Alert" one more time, and then just shows the same information again.
Logged
Baki
Rookie
**
Posts: 232
Croatia


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #207 on: March 26, 2016, 03:41:31 PM »

WA 10% in :

 Sanders - 72,2
 Clinton- 27,3
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #208 on: March 26, 2016, 03:42:01 PM »

Sanders at 71% in Snohomish.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #209 on: March 26, 2016, 03:42:07 PM »

I am sick and tired of Sanders supporters underplaying their man's chances. If you thought it wouldn't change anything, you guys wouldn't be out there supporting him. He was supposed to win by 30 points. This is absurd.

Hillary has a 300 delegate cushion. She can afford to be crushed in a few states, Washington being one of them.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #210 on: March 26, 2016, 03:43:22 PM »

Lincoln County 2008: 63% Obama
Lincoln County 2016: 71% Sanders

Snohomish is starting to come in, but it's only one precinct out of 7 (so far 71% Bernie). Obama got 65% here in 2008.
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #211 on: March 26, 2016, 03:44:55 PM »

Cowlitz came in strong for Sanders, he did better than Obama.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #212 on: March 26, 2016, 03:45:00 PM »

Cowlitz County 2008: 59% Obama
Cowlitz County 2016: 77% Sanders
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #213 on: March 26, 2016, 03:45:25 PM »

Man, caucuses suck. Good thing they're nearly over after today.
Logged
#TheShadowyAbyss
TheShadowyAbyss
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,027
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -5.81, S: -3.64

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #214 on: March 26, 2016, 03:46:00 PM »

15% reporting in Alaska

Sanders 81.6%
Clinton 18.4%
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #215 on: March 26, 2016, 03:46:36 PM »

15% reporting in Alaska

Sanders 81.6%
Clinton 18.4%

Shocked
Logged
bigedlb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 280
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #216 on: March 26, 2016, 03:48:26 PM »

15% reporting in Alaska

Sanders 81.6%
Clinton 18.4%

22.5% in AK

Sanders 84% Clinton 16%
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,708


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #217 on: March 26, 2016, 03:49:02 PM »

Wow, I bet you can't find an area of 1500 voters that went 98% Bernie even in Vermont. Of course I'm sure there were some precincts where all 5 voters went Bernie.
Logged
heatcharger
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,358
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -1.04, S: -0.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #218 on: March 26, 2016, 03:52:26 PM »

Is Seattle going to be the first major urban center to go for Bernie? Because pretty much all big cities that have voted so far have gone for Clinton, even Boston.
Logged
Fusionmunster
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,483


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #219 on: March 26, 2016, 03:53:23 PM »

Is Seattle going to be the first major urban center to go for Bernie? Because pretty much all big cities that have voted so far have gone for Clinton, even Boston.

Boise and Salt Lake City both went for Bernie.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #220 on: March 26, 2016, 03:53:37 PM »

Clinton's support in Cowlitz county nearly cut in half from 2008 (40% to 23%). She's going to be just ahead in viability if what comes in so far holds... below viability if the 98% in West Seattle holds.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,875


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #221 on: March 26, 2016, 03:54:45 PM »

I also love all the people on here who are like "Beet! Quit being unreasonable! Your candidate only has 2% of the vote in 1/17th of a major urban center! Stop freaking out!"
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,520
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #222 on: March 26, 2016, 03:55:29 PM »

Is Seattle going to be the first major urban center to go for Bernie? Because pretty much all big cities that have voted so far have gone for Clinton, even Boston.

Denver, Grand Rapids, Minneapolis/St. Paul, and Salt Lake City were other major urban areas to go for Bernie
Logged
ElectionsGuy
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,106
United States


Political Matrix
E: 7.10, S: -7.65

P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #223 on: March 26, 2016, 03:55:54 PM »

Is Seattle going to be the first major urban center to go for Bernie? Because pretty much all big cities that have voted so far have gone for Clinton, even Boston.

Its a caucus, but the Minneapolis-St Paul area went for Bernie. Also Denver. And if you consider Tulsa, Grand Rapids, Boise, Salt Lake City and Wichita major cities...
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,924


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #224 on: March 26, 2016, 03:56:03 PM »

Is Seattle going to be the first major urban center to go for Bernie? Because pretty much all big cities that have voted so far have gone for Clinton, even Boston.

He won Austin.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 ... 32  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 13 queries.