Democratic Freak States Holy Saturday results thread (1st caucuses begin @1pmET)

[Boston Bread]

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

If anything, IA looks like an extremely poor performance now.
It was a heavily-white caucus. Based on current results 65% for Bernie should have been possible.

[The Other Castro]

I go to CNN to check Hawaii coverage and instead see Jesus saving a woman.

[Xing]

Problem is King's in Hilldawg's best county so she will gain a bit, not enough to make a big difference!

Anyways how much time left for Alaska results?

You mean Hawaii's results? Probably another hour or so.

Also, Sanders has been climbing in King, so I don't think he's going to dip below 72%, at this point.

Yea Hawaii, He won't fall below 72% I know that. Seattle could have done better honestly - The entire state gave Bernie 75-80%. And likewise the google sheet showed - Seattle will have more people so a 66% there would drag it down & we got fewer results from Seattle.

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

I actually think that it was some of the surburbs, like Bellevue, where Clinton did better. Based on anecdotal evidence, it seems like Sanders won Seattle itself around with somewhere between 70% and 75%.

[Flake]

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

If anything, IA looks like an extremely poor performance now.
It was a heavily-white caucus. Based on current results 65% for Bernie should have been possible.

No candidate would ever get 65% in Iowa. In fact he was supposed to lose by a larger margin than what he actually lost by, and both his and Clinton's ground game was extremely strong. Clinton just barely competed in the other caucus states.

[RaphaelDLG]

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

If anything, IA looks like an extremely poor performance now.
It was a heavily-white caucus. Based on current results 65% for Bernie should have been possible.

No candidate would ever get 65% in Iowa. In fact he was supposed to lose by a larger margin than what he actually lost by, and both his and Clinton's ground game was extremely strong. Clinton just barely competed in the other caucus states.

Agree with your first statement, disagree with your second one, agree with your third and fourth.

[RaphaelDLG]

Most pressing question of the night for me:  Who did the Macklecrats in Seattle break for?!?

[Shadows]

Problem is King's in Hilldawg's best county so she will gain a bit, not enough to make a big difference!

Anyways how much time left for Alaska results?

You mean Hawaii's results? Probably another hour or so.

Also, Sanders has been climbing in King, so I don't think he's going to dip below 72%, at this point.

Yea Hawaii, He won't fall below 72% I know that. Seattle could have done better honestly - The entire state gave Bernie 75-80%. And likewise the google sheet showed - Seattle will have more people so a 66% there would drag it down & we got fewer results from Seattle.

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

I actually think that it was some of the surburbs, like Bellevue, where Clinton did better. Based on anecdotal evidence, it seems like Sanders won Seattle itself around with somewhere between 70% and 75%.

I have some questions -

Age divide in your caucus? As in young-old divide

White-Minority breakup? How did minorities like Hispanics or blacks go - Assuming a community went overwhelmingly for Sanders or Clinton

Based on what I saw in the local news thing, it looks like there were very few change of votes - People decided & stuck to their original notion

How could you categorize the energy of Bernie & Hillary supporters?

[yourelection]

Is there a map somewhere that shows which states have primaries and which caucuses?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

I go to CNN to check Hawaii coverage and instead see Jesus saving a woman.

At least they're covering a Jewish socialist who worked as a carpenter.

[Mr. Morden]

Video of results being announced in Hilo:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xW5xOWCO49A&feature=youtu.be

[Xing]

Problem is King's in Hilldawg's best county so she will gain a bit, not enough to make a big difference!

Anyways how much time left for Alaska results?

You mean Hawaii's results? Probably another hour or so.

Also, Sanders has been climbing in King, so I don't think he's going to dip below 72%, at this point.

Yea Hawaii, He won't fall below 72% I know that. Seattle could have done better honestly - The entire state gave Bernie 75-80%. And likewise the google sheet showed - Seattle will have more people so a 66% there would drag it down & we got fewer results from Seattle.

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

I actually think that it was some of the surburbs, like Bellevue, where Clinton did better. Based on anecdotal evidence, it seems like Sanders won Seattle itself around with somewhere between 70% and 75%.

I have some questions -

Age divide in your caucus? As in young-old divide

White-Minority breakup? How did minorities like Hispanics or blacks go - Assuming a community went overwhelmingly for Sanders or Clinton

Based on what I saw in the local news thing, it looks like there were very few change of votes - People decided & stuck to their original notion

How could you categorize the energy of Bernie & Hillary supporters?

In terms of age, there was a pretty even distribution of younger-older voters. The age divide between the candidates didn't seem super strong, although Clinton's supporters seemed slightly older on average.

My precinct was mostly white, though there were a few Asians and Latinos. I didn't see a major difference in how they voted.

There were six undecided voters. Two of them ended up going for Clinton, one went for Sanders, the rest stayed undecided.

[#TheShadowyAbyss]

So, when are we going to be getting Hawaii results?

[dax00]

CNN has Alaska 100% reporting, with Sanders winning 80.7% to 19.3%.

So not one Atlas prediction was right (nobody has Bernie >80%)

My prediction on page 1 of the prediction thread had him at 81% in AK lol

[Shadows]

Problem is King's in Hilldawg's best county so she will gain a bit, not enough to make a big difference!

Anyways how much time left for Alaska results?

You mean Hawaii's results? Probably another hour or so.

Also, Sanders has been climbing in King, so I don't think he's going to dip below 72%, at this point.

Yea Hawaii, He won't fall below 72% I know that. Seattle could have done better honestly - The entire state gave Bernie 75-80%. And likewise the google sheet showed - Seattle will have more people so a 66% there would drag it down & we got fewer results from Seattle.

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

I actually think that it was some of the surburbs, like Bellevue, where Clinton did better. Based on anecdotal evidence, it seems like Sanders won Seattle itself around with somewhere between 70% and 75%.

I have some questions -

Age divide in your caucus? As in young-old divide

White-Minority breakup? How did minorities like Hispanics or blacks go - Assuming a community went overwhelmingly for Sanders or Clinton

Based on what I saw in the local news thing, it looks like there were very few change of votes - People decided & stuck to their original notion

How could you categorize the energy of Bernie & Hillary supporters?

In terms of age, there was a pretty even distribution of younger-older voters. The age divide between the candidates didn't seem super strong, although Clinton's supporters seemed slightly older on average.

My precinct was mostly white, though there were a few Asians and Latinos. I didn't see a major difference in how they voted.

There were six undecided voters. Two of them ended up going for Clinton, one went for Sanders, the rest stayed undecided.

Yes the local channel showed a surprisingly high number of older voters for Bernie, some even 1st timer older voters.

Weird that there was no huge youth participation overwhelmingly for Bernie. I don't get the purpose of these undecided though if they won't vote - This is dumb - Why come all the way & stand in a line for so long & go through the entire process - Waste so much time, energy, money!

And they stay undecided - And not just 1, but 3, that is half of them - Plain weirdos!

[Boston Bread]

CNN has Alaska 100% reporting, with Sanders winning 80.7% to 19.3%.

So not one Atlas prediction was right (nobody has Bernie >80%)

My prediction on page 1 of the prediction thread had him at 81% in AK lol

I meant on here: https://uselectionatlas.org/PRED/PRESIDENT/2016D/pred.php?action=statepred&fips=2

Congrats though!

[Xing]

Problem is King's in Hilldawg's best county so she will gain a bit, not enough to make a big difference!

Anyways how much time left for Alaska results?

You mean Hawaii's results? Probably another hour or so.

Also, Sanders has been climbing in King, so I don't think he's going to dip below 72%, at this point.

Yea Hawaii, He won't fall below 72% I know that. Seattle could have done better honestly - The entire state gave Bernie 75-80%. And likewise the google sheet showed - Seattle will have more people so a 66% there would drag it down & we got fewer results from Seattle.

Great result none-the-less. NH looks more n more like a bad performance now!

I actually think that it was some of the surburbs, like Bellevue, where Clinton did better. Based on anecdotal evidence, it seems like Sanders won Seattle itself around with somewhere between 70% and 75%.

I have some questions -

Age divide in your caucus? As in young-old divide

White-Minority breakup? How did minorities like Hispanics or blacks go - Assuming a community went overwhelmingly for Sanders or Clinton

Based on what I saw in the local news thing, it looks like there were very few change of votes - People decided & stuck to their original notion

How could you categorize the energy of Bernie & Hillary supporters?

In terms of age, there was a pretty even distribution of younger-older voters. The age divide between the candidates didn't seem super strong, although Clinton's supporters seemed slightly older on average.

My precinct was mostly white, though there were a few Asians and Latinos. I didn't see a major difference in how they voted.

There were six undecided voters. Two of them ended up going for Clinton, one went for Sanders, the rest stayed undecided.

Yes the local channel showed a surprisingly high number of older voters for Bernie, some even 1st timer older voters.

Weird that there was no huge youth participation overwhelmingly for Bernie. I don't get the purpose of these undecided though if they won't vote - This is dumb - Why come all the way & stand in a line for so long & go through the entire process - Waste so much time, energy, money!

And they stay undecided - And not just 1, but 3, that is half of them - Plain weirdos!

Part of it might have been that we weren't given much time to talk. Three minutes for each candidate.

[ElectionsGuy]

Alaska 82-18 for Sanders!

[IceSpear]

Could Hawaii be any slower?

[RaphaelDLG]

Could Hawaii be any slower?

Patience, cuz.  You need to learn how they do things on the island.

[dax00]

Could Hawaii be any slower?

yeah, give 'em all chichis and play mellow steel drum music - you bet it could be slower. sanders reddit says official results around top of next hour.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Washington delegates are probably 73-27 with 1 way too close to call.

[RI]

Sanders finished just under 80% in Alaska in terms of actual votes. Just over 80% in terms of delegates.

[IceSpear]

Washington delegates are probably 73-27 with 1 way too close to call.

So +46/47. Bernie would need to win CA by double digits to match that delegate haul in another state. Crazy. Hillary's highest is +72 in Texas.

[Xing]

As I said earlier, it'll probably be 73-28, so +45 for Bernie.

[dax00]

I predicted a 73-28 split last night ... although I hope it's 74-27, which is still possible.