Did Lee Harvey Oswald act alone?

[Ungern]

For me

a) I'm even not sure that Oswald has fired on Kennedy ...
He was too visible ...  He was (for me) the man who will pay and not the man who will fire.
Nobody can explain the reasons of Oswald to kill the policeman "Pitty"

b) I'm sure that there was a team of 3 shooters (the snipers work always by team because the sniper can not seen apart his target ;you must thus have a man for the survey and a other for the close protection) .
In my mind there was two team of snipers one in face of the target and the other in the back of the target .
In my mind , these 6 snipers didn't survive long time after their mission : they has been shooted  immediately after their return .

c) the magic bullet is a "gag" ...

[Ungern]

I think he was alone. Then again, didn't exist during the assassination.

Hello ,

Sorry but my english is bad ...
I dont understand what you say here :  "Then again, didn't exist during the assassination"...and it could be very interessant .

[Ungern]

I'm sorry,but it's not possible :

a) The rate of fire is unpossible with his Manlicher Carcano .
b) The magic Bullet is not become on the stretcher of Kernnedy "alone" .

[Ungern]

I'm comming back .

When i said : " the rate of fire", is not the simpel rate of fire (one shot after the other),but the rate of fire on a mobile target who is going away ... and it's very different ...

With a bolt gun you must after each shot reload and aim the target again before fire again .

The entiere sequence of fire has been recorded ,and the delay between each shot has been mesured .
It's not possible to have a precise fire on a mobile target with these rate of fire .

Oswald was very bad during the shooting's exercices of the Marines,and the shoots against Kennedy were not easy from his position : there was a tree in front of him,and the target go away, thus reduce in size .

When i said the "magic bullet",i want to said that the apparence of the bullet is absolut non compatible to a réal bullet who as been shot against a solid target . After one simpel impact ,a real bullet is strongly deformed.

And last argument : the fatal shoot was becoming from front of Kennedy and not from the back .
The head of Kennedy has been projected from front to back ,thus has been shooting from front at the level of the bridge or the little hill front and right of him .

Thus for me Oswald has never shoot ,you didn't hear the gun's shoots of Oswal,but the gun's shoots of two or three   gunmen .

Perhaps Oswald has tried to fire but has not could fire . A idea for me is that his gun didn't have  cardridges or that the cartridge where not "usable" , not "effective" ...
No fire,no sound but a gun full of fingerprints...
And somebody "after" the manipulations of Oswald has unload his weapon and leved used cartridges

[Ungern]

if we had a crystal-clear evidence that one of these theories were correct, people would just refuse too believe .

For me,if i would have the true,
I'm not sure that i would tell him .
You can start ,today still, a following of disasters ,with these true .

[Ungern]

Sorry,i know nothing on what you said .

I'm not conspirationist but i analyse one situation .

a) Some years before the murder of Kennedy , Oswald worked on the secret base of Adana Incirlik in Turkey and was radar opérator for the U2 project (a ultrasecret project) in this time .
And this man can go to Russia ?
b) Oswald has living in Russia some time and could after that return in USA ?
c) This man kill without any raison a policeman : Sgt Tippit .
d) During is questionning for the murder of Tippit and for the murder of the Pérsident nobody take note or record the questionning ?

This are facts .
Materials facts .
No conspirationist ideas .

How do you explain this ?