Every state where Bush got 55% or over, should not be touched by the Dems. Its a waste of money.
That is possibly the wisest thing you've ever posted. :-)
I would qualify that when a nominee is named. If Bayh is the nominee, by all means, spend money in IN.
Good thing the Democrats gave up on NH, which went 62.49% for George HW Bush (9.12 points better than his national average).
Shira has it right, on this one. You don't pour money, at this point, into Utah, hoping that in 2008, Utah might be competive. It is a good idea to try tp use "party building" money in close states, like OH, or CO, NM, NV in the west. Spending money
now in UT or WY might not be money well spent.
