FCC Approves Internet Subsidies for the Poor
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 09:13:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  FCC Approves Internet Subsidies for the Poor
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: FCC Approves Internet Subsidies for the Poor  (Read 571 times)
Frodo
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 24,566
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 31, 2016, 11:54:58 PM »

Party-line vote, as you would expect:

FCC approves Internet subsidies for the poor

By Mario Trujillo - 03/31/16 03:53 PM EDT

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Santander
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,932
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: 4.00, S: 2.61


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 01, 2016, 12:33:24 AM »

I see that the communist Muslim Kenyan Alinskyite ACORN community organizer has brought back the Obamaphone strategy.
Logged
Ebsy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,001
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2016, 01:18:21 AM »

I see that the communist Muslim Kenyan Alinskyite ACORN community organizer has brought back the Obamaphone strategy.
Yes, Obama was hard at work creating the Lifeline program when he was 20 years old.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 01, 2016, 07:43:52 AM »

Seems like it would be cheaper and fairly easy to just put in free WiFi hot spots in poor urban places, but I'm guessing the various ISPs (cable and phone companies) would lose money that way so we're stuck giving out subsidies forever because the American public believes in the stupid "lesser of two evils" nonsense....and hell, poor urban places aren't even that open minded.  It's a choice of racist corruption or just regular corruption.

Much harder/more expensive to do in poor rural places, and they are less important anyway.  They don't vote the right way you see.
Logged
This account no longer in use.
cxs018
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,282


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2016, 07:45:42 AM »

Seems like it would be cheaper and fairly easy to just put in free WiFi hot spots in poor urban places, but I'm guessing the various ISPs (cable and phone companies) would lose money that way so we're stuck giving out subsidies forever because the American public believes in the stupid "lesser of two evils" nonsense....and hell, poor urban places aren't even that open minded.  It's a choice of racist corruption or just regular corruption.

Much harder/more expensive to do in poor rural places, and they are less important anyway.  They don't vote the right way you see.

The two most rural states in the country are Maine and Vermont.
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2016, 07:48:34 AM »

that's great!
Logged
pbrower2a
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,859
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2016, 04:11:23 PM »

The Internet costs practically nothing.

I can take my reader to the local public library and use it with freedom.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 11 queries.