Why did Sanders only get 55.7% in Wyoming?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 09:50:50 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  Why did Sanders only get 55.7% in Wyoming?		 « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]
Author Topic: Why did Sanders only get 55.7% in Wyoming?  (Read 2390 times)
DrScholl
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,149
United States


Political Matrix
E: -5.55, S: -3.30

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2016, 01:18:58 PM »
It was a matter of better organization. Clinton's campaign likely wanted to avoid another blowout like a couple of weeks ago, so they did some ground work.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,300
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: April 10, 2016, 09:00:54 PM »
Wyoming + Dem + caucus + closed caucus = very few people (280 to be specific)
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,085


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: April 10, 2016, 09:12:37 PM »
Quote from: nclib on April 10, 2016, 09:00:54 PM
Wyoming + Dem + caucus + closed caucus = very few people (280 to be specific)

That is the number of delegates elected to the state convention. I don't think there is an official popular vote total.
Logged
Flake
Flo
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,688
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: April 10, 2016, 09:31:54 PM »
It's like Nebraska 2.0
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.211 seconds with 11 queries.