Additionally, Bradley won by 91,000 votes; the GOP primary had 98,000 more voters. The result - regardless of the finer points - was effectively spot-on in terms of expectations from turnout.
Which really makes me wonder just why they had that during a low turnout primary election? Seriously this country's patchwork of various elections at various dates needs to be consolidated into higher turnout elections.
Though at this point I wonder why anyone would think judicial elections are a good idea at all. How can a judge be impartial? The whole idea is completely bogus.