A quick and dirty proof that Perot didn't cost Bush the 1992 election (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 07:50:57 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  A quick and dirty proof that Perot didn't cost Bush the 1992 election (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: A quick and dirty proof that Perot didn't cost Bush the 1992 election  (Read 1388 times)
mencken
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,222
« on: April 10, 2016, 01:22:56 PM »

I did this once a few years ago. The problem was that the opposite trend emerged when I looked at county level trends for most states, although it still did not flip enough states to the Bush column to swing the election
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.