drumpf campaign proving toxic to nation's schoolchildren

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Higgs]

*Trump

[Bojack Horseman]

That's really not surprising. He really brings out the worst in people who have waited this long to scratch their itch.

[Young Conservative]

Does this have any actual proof or is it just guessing?

[SUSAN CRUSHBONE]

Does this have any actual proof or is it just guessing?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[Absentee Voting Ghost of Ruin]

Trump's toxicity and hatred for freedom is only fettered by his own bloated ego and incompetence.

[Classic Conservative]

In my own class we now have to have racism and cultural appropriation class because some kids call this Asian Kid, Ching-Chong and told a black girl "go back to Uganda you n." Also we jad this kid scream Gas the Muslims in class.

[user12345]

In my own class we now have to have racism and cultural appropriation class because some kids call this Asian Kid, Ching-Chong and told a black girl "go back to Uganda you n." Also we jad this kid scream Gas the Muslims in class.

Good on the school for taking action on it.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

It's always been this way. Where did you all go to school?

[angus]

Would this not be better placed under US General Discussion rather than the Presidential Election?  Those schoolchildren may be watching the campaign, but they won't be voting. 

The children do learn about these things, and it has been widely reported that teachers are frustrated by it.  See, for example, this article.

An excerpt:
Trump's behavior transcends party politics. His hateful words have distinguished him as a topic for class discussion because our conversations are not about who should win the presidency, but how presidential candidates should comport themselves on the campaign trail. My students need to know that Trump's behavior is beyond historical precedent.

[Figueira]

Would this not be better placed under US General Discussion rather than the Presidential Election?  Those schoolchildren may be watching the campaign, but they won't be voting. 

The children do learn about these things, and it has been widely reported that teachers are frustrated by it.  See, for example, this article.

An excerpt:
Trump's behavior transcends party politics. His hateful words have distinguished him as a topic for class discussion because our conversations are not about who should win the presidency, but how presidential candidates should comport themselves on the campaign trail. My students need to know that Trump's behavior is beyond historical precedent.

It's still information relevant to the election.

[ProudModerate2]

It's always been this way. Where did you all go to school?

The information is not saying that "the behavior" was never present, and now is suddenly there.
It is saying that there has been a noticeable increase, and such a drastic change that teachers see it.

We shouldn't be surprised. Trump = Hatred.

[The Mikado]

Trump's behavior transcends party politics. His hateful words have distinguished him as a topic for class discussion because our conversations are not about who should win the presidency, but how presidential candidates should comport themselves on the campaign trail. My students need to know that Trump's behavior is beyond historical precedent.

Beyond historical precedent?



Some people have very short memories.

[Figueira]

"historical precedent" meaning elections that elementary school students wouldn't remember but older people would. Like 2004-2012.

[Mister Mets]

Does this have any actual proof or is it just guessing?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's not really proof. It's a subjective sense of things from members of a group that tends to lean liberal.

[dax00]

"historical precedent" meaning elections that elementary school students wouldn't remember but older people would. Like 2004-2012.

*Colbert emoji* That's a laughable premise. History is not confined to the past dozen years.

[Sprouts Farmers Market ✘]

Does this have any actual proof or is it just guessing?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's not really proof. It's a subjective sense of things from members of a group that tends to lean liberal.

Seriously. This doesn't even seem like a proper study. There is a very obvious bias in this study that a person is likely to start noticing the action because Trump is bombarded in their face in a negative light all day.

[Tetro Kornbluth]

[Reginald]

I don't doubt this is occurring, but I love how this article is two mentions of un-linked survey results surrounded by paragraphs of commentary.

[Atlas Has Shrugged]

lol SPLC

[Figueira]

"historical precedent" meaning elections that elementary school students wouldn't remember but older people would. Like 2004-2012.

*Colbert emoji* That's a laughable premise. History is not confined to the past dozen years.

The point, in this context, is that they should know that this isn't something that happens every election.

[Derpist]

Al Jazeera and the SPLC.

It's like they want TRUMP to win.

[SillyAmerican]

Yes, but which of these T-shirts would those schoolchildren be wearing? And why?

 



Political correctness is alive and well...

[ProudModerate2]

Yes, but which of these T-shirts would those schoolchildren be wearing? And why?

 



Political correctness is alive and well...

What wrong with just "I stand with my neighbors" ?

[ProudModerate2]

Does this have any actual proof or is it just guessing?

You must be logged in to read this quote.

That's not really proof. It's a subjective sense of things from members of a group that tends to lean liberal.

Seriously. This doesn't even seem like a proper study. There is a very obvious bias in this study that a person is likely to start noticing the action because Trump is bombarded in their face in a negative light all day.

And the reason trump is shown "in a negative light all day" is because of his own doing.
I mean, if you are going to act like an idiot (almost everyday), be prepared for the media to call you out on it.