America's most trusted newspaper, the New York Daily News, endorses Hillary!

[Lief 🗽]

BEAUTIFUL!!

[Pyro]

Shameful, but completely expected.

[Holmes]

They had no choice after that disastrous Sanders interview.

[Gass3268]

Establishment rag going to shill. Sad!

[Ebsy]

Establishment rag going to shill. Sad!

Indeed. Responding to editorial board questions with, "I haven't thought about it that much." is really sad.

[Gass3268]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

[dspNY]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

It wasn't Mort Zuckerman who came unprepared for the interview. Stop attacking the bogeyman and start focusing on your candidate's flaws. If by some miracle your candidate becomes the nominee the Republicans will make that Daily News interview look like a walk in the park

[Pyro]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

It wasn't Mort Zuckerman who came unprepared for the interview.

Not this again. The interview was a hit piece designed to trap Sanders in a bad light.

Daily News asks who would decide to break up the banks, Sanders answers the Treasury Dept through Dodd-Frank, as Clinton had also stated. Daily News then awkwardly, repeatedly brings up the Federal Reserve (not part of the question nor Sanders' answer- and in fact does not have the authority) and Sanders is understandably caught off guard cause the Fed has nothing to do with his plan for the banks or the overall question. It was a manipulative interview and in terms of journalistic integrity, the NY Daily News should be taken just as seriously as Fox News.

[Lief 🗽]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

It wasn't Mort Zuckerman who came unprepared for the interview.

Not this again. The interview was a hit piece designed to trap Sanders in a bad light.

Daily News asks who would decide to break up the banks, Sanders answers the Treasury Dept through Dodd-Frank, as Clinton had also stated. Daily News then awkwardly, repeatedly brings up the Federal Reserve (not part of the question nor Sanders' answer- and in fact does not have the authority) and Sanders is understandably caught off guard cause the Fed has nothing to do with his plan for the banks or the overall question. It was a manipulative interview and in terms of journalistic integrity, the NY Daily News should be taken just as seriously as Fox News.

lol, if he knew that the Fed has nothing to do with it (which he didn't, but let's indulge this nonsense) he could have just, you know, corrected them or explained that it has nothing to do with it.

[Attorney General & PPT Dwarven Dragon]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

It wasn't Mort Zuckerman who came unprepared for the interview.

Not this again. The interview was a hit piece designed to trap Sanders in a bad light.

Daily News asks who would decide to break up the banks, Sanders answers the Treasury Dept through Dodd-Frank, as Clinton had also stated. Daily News then awkwardly, repeatedly brings up the Federal Reserve (not part of the question nor Sanders' answer- and in fact does not have the authority) and Sanders is understandably caught off guard cause the Fed has nothing to do with his plan for the banks or the overall question. It was a manipulative interview and in terms of journalistic integrity, the NY Daily News should be taken just as seriously as Fox News.

lol, if he knew that the Fed has nothing to do with it (which he didn't, but let's indulge this nonsense) he could have just, you know, corrected them or explained that it has nothing to do with it.

Yeah. For once, Leif has a point. Even if Sanders was clueless on the fed's role, he at least should have said some Paul esque "audit the fed" talk to get past the question. Saying he didn't know leaves him incredibly exposed and may have lost him the endorsement.

[Shadows]

Was NY Times to the one who lied about WMD in Iraq or something? Which was the newspaper who did that?

[Pyro]

Lol, of course a paper owned by Mort Zuckerman is going to endorse the establishment choice. Sad!

It wasn't Mort Zuckerman who came unprepared for the interview.

Not this again. The interview was a hit piece designed to trap Sanders in a bad light.

Daily News asks who would decide to break up the banks, Sanders answers the Treasury Dept through Dodd-Frank, as Clinton had also stated. Daily News then awkwardly, repeatedly brings up the Federal Reserve (not part of the question nor Sanders' answer- and in fact does not have the authority) and Sanders is understandably caught off guard cause the Fed has nothing to do with his plan for the banks or the overall question. It was a manipulative interview and in terms of journalistic integrity, the NY Daily News should be taken just as seriously as Fox News.

lol, if he knew that the Fed has nothing to do with it (which he didn't, but let's indulge this nonsense) he could have just, you know, corrected them or explained that it has nothing to do with it.

Yeah. For once, Leif has a point. Even if Sanders was clueless on the fed's role, he at least should have said some Paul esque "audit the fed" talk to get past the question. Saying he didn't know leaves him incredibly exposed and may have lost him the endorsement.

As for that, I'm glad he relented that he didn't know the 'right' answer to their gotcha question instead of compounding some politician-like dodge.

[Maxwell]

Yeah Bernie was trapped into not knowing specifics.

[Averroës Nix]

Significant blow to the Sanders campaign among the "readers of trashy, exploitative left-of-center tabloids" demographic.

[Ebsy]

Significant blow to the Sanders campaign among the "readers of trashy, exploitative left-of-center tabloids" demographic.

Sanders has more than his fair share of endorsements from the dregs of American society.

[Oakvale]

lmao jesus

[Maxwell]

The Lief of Newspapers!

[ProgressiveCanadian]

Well after the soft ball interview with Clinton this isn't a surprise. This is just going to rile people up more about the media.

[Young Conservative]

Most trusted newspaper? By what standard?

[Holmes]

"Softball interview" lmao

[ProgressiveCanadian]

"Softball interview" lmao

You obviously haven't seen it. The paper endorsing Clinton proves my point however.

[Xing]

A New York newspaper endorses Clinton? UNBELIEVABLE GAME CHANGER!

[Lief 🗽]

The Lief of Newspapers!

obviously I made a huge mistake not going into trashy left-wing tabloid journalism

[Ebsy]

Well after the soft ball interview with Clinton this isn't a surprise. This is just going to rile people up more about the media.

You mean the one where they asked her to defend her actions during the Honduran coup? You probably haven't even read it.

[catographer]

To New Yorker Atlas members: Fight fight fight!