Theory of justice: Rawls or Nozick (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 01, 2024, 05:23:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Theory of justice: Rawls or Nozick (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: to which of these two theories of justice, do you most subscribe?
#1
Rawls (D)
 
#2
Nozick (D)
 
#3
Rawls (R)
 
#4
Nozick (R)
 
#5
Rawls (I)
 
#6
Nozick (I)
 
#7
Rawls (L)
 
#8
Nozick (L)
 
#9
Rawls (O)
 
#10
Nozick (O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 18

Author Topic: Theory of justice: Rawls or Nozick  (Read 22381 times)
Emsworth
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,054


« on: June 07, 2005, 01:04:51 PM »

1) Each person is to have an equal right to the most extensiive liberty compatible with a similar liberty for others (this principle reflects a traditional liberal commitment to formal equality)
2) Social and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) to the greatest benefit of the least advantaged; and (B) attached to positions and offices open to all under conditions of fair equality of opportunity (this so-called 'difference principle) points towards a significant measure of social inequality
I would agree with Rawls on (1), but not on (2). In my opinion, principle (1) should apply to economic situations as well.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 13 queries.