GM to cut 25,000 jobs, shut more plants
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 25, 2024, 03:29:33 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  GM to cut 25,000 jobs, shut more plants
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: GM to cut 25,000 jobs, shut more plants  (Read 3733 times)
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: June 07, 2005, 03:41:13 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: June 07, 2005, 03:42:47 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

How do you plan on doing it?
Through the UN?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: June 07, 2005, 03:44:16 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

How do you plan on doing it?
Through the UN?

Through military force dumbsh**t.
Logged
Bono
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,699
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: June 07, 2005, 03:49:57 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

How do you plan on doing it?
Through the UN?

Through military force dumbsh**t.

Ok, phkntroll.
Logged
Dave from Michigan
9iron768
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: June 07, 2005, 04:11:42 PM »

Well if GM ever hopes to make a comeback this is necessary.
Hopefully this will help them but they really need to fix the healthcare problem (without universal healthcare).  Hopefully the Plant that my uncle works at will be saved.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: June 07, 2005, 05:19:43 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

How do you plan on doing it?
Through the UN?

Actually, "essentially" meant "not necessarily". Unionization may or may not occur. Fundamentally what occurs in the long term (say 100 or 200 years) given continued capital accumulation is that labor becomes relatively scarce. Whether actual unionization occurs or not, the end result will be the same-- the workers' position improves relative to the owners of capital. That's the essential point. The sooner it happens, the better for everyone.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: June 07, 2005, 05:23:39 PM »

that's exactly what happens everywhere socialized health care is tried.

Who said anything about socialized health care?

No go run along and suck on your mommy's tits like a good little home-schooled boy.

What a troll.

Obviously.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: June 07, 2005, 05:32:55 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

When are you planning on becomming "Dictator of the world" ?
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: June 07, 2005, 05:33:51 PM »

While I feel sorry for those that lost their jobs, this is good news.  I really do hope GM goes belly up.

Good point again. GM makes a terrible product.
Logged
Beet
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,904


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: June 07, 2005, 05:36:49 PM »

The union structure works in some cases and not in others. The fact that unionization pinches a corporation's profits makes no difference if all corporations are unionized.

Are you planning to unionize China, Mexico, Vietnam and every other third world country on the planet?

Yes, essentially.

When are you planning on becomming "Dictator of the world" ?

See my reply to Bono.
Logged
WalterMitty
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,572


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: June 07, 2005, 06:06:13 PM »

gm should move all of its us operations to a right-to-work (ie normal) state.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: June 07, 2005, 06:07:58 PM »

gm should move all of its us operations to a right-to-work (ie normal) state.

Thankfully my state is a freedom loving state and is Right-to-work.
Logged
The Dowager Mod
texasgurl
Moderator
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,975
United States


Political Matrix
E: -9.48, S: -8.57

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: June 07, 2005, 06:08:55 PM »

320k employees
1.1 mil others collecting benifits.
no wonder they can't make a profit.
Logged
A18
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,794
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: June 07, 2005, 06:10:12 PM »

Right-to-work laws are a violation of the separation of business and state.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: June 07, 2005, 06:41:54 PM »

unions are good for the economy?  right?

Unions are good for working people, yes. But Republicans hate working people, so they're anti-union.

The biggest factor in GM's decreasing profitability is health insurance costs, you dimwit, not unions.

oh yeah.  that's it/

it couldnt be that union labor is horribly inefficient and uncompetitive.  the unions over-inflating wages and pensions probably had nothing to do with these closings either.

keep your head buried in the sand.

You're wrong.  Even without any unions, the auto workers would make maybe $5-10 an hour (the minimum necessary to feed them and cause them to drag themselves back in the next day).  Still far too much to 'compete' with the $5/day such a worker would make in China.

The converse argument is also true - up untill now the competition has been mainly from Japan, where wages and benefits are generally slightly higher than in the US.

So, unions have nothing to do with the problem, rather, the cause is primarily poor management by capital.
Logged
The Vorlon
Vorlon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,660


Political Matrix
E: 8.00, S: -4.21

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: June 08, 2005, 07:18:37 AM »
« Edited: June 08, 2005, 07:31:52 AM by The Vorlon »

The "problem" with GM is simply the advantage of the young over the old.

GM has been around getting close to 100 years now, as a consequence they have a lot of pensions to pay and healthcare to provide as a result of their aging and retired workforce.

If you compare this to, say a new Honda or Nissan plant, one that typically has much younger workers (hence lower healthcare cost) plus no retired benifits to pay yet, of course the Honda or Nissan plant has a dramatically lower unit cost.

This has nothing to do with the skill of management, it just is the way it is.

That being said, the real reason GM has gone from a 50% markey share a generation ago to +/- 25% today is simple - the foreign companies just make, on balance, better vehicles than GM does.

Total employment in the auto industry is not nearly as hard hit as the headlines suggest BTW.  True, GM and Ford and Chrysler are closing down, but Honda, Hyundia, Nissan, Toyota, MB, BMW and others have also opened a lot of new plants.

A unionized plant in Detroit shutting down is just somehow bigger news than a non-Union plant in Alabama opening up.

Its actually mainly a regional shift, away from MIchigan and Ohio, and into the south where their are fewer taxes and less Unions.

The nameplate aside, the US content of a Honda Accord is almost identical to the US content of say a GM Impala.

Indeed "US" companies like GM and Ford have shifted more production to Mexico than "foreign" companies like Honda ands Toyota.
Logged
Filuwaúrdjan
Realpolitik
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 67,706
United Kingdom


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: June 08, 2005, 08:55:42 AM »

320k employees
1.1 mil others collecting benifits.
no wonder they can't make a profit.

^^^

On a smaller scale it's the same story with UK Coal over here...
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: June 08, 2005, 10:04:11 AM »

So we're supposed to lower the cost of health care... you know, by making it suck?

Hey jackass, who said anything about making it suck?



He is a spolied rich kid that knows nothing.. Ignore him!

Now if I was to say the same about opebo, for some reason you'd disagree. Ah the double standards.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: June 08, 2005, 01:15:31 PM »

It is not unusual for companies to start small, grow into huge firms and then eventually succumb to competition from younger leaner firms. Walmart did this to KMart, and KMart did it years ago to their competitors. Of the firms that made up the Dow Jones average 100 years ago, I think only one is still in existence today. My concern here is that the competition in this case comes from foreign companies not American companies. I don't think it bodes well for the future of America.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: June 08, 2005, 01:37:24 PM »

It is not unusual for companies to start small, grow into huge firms and then eventually succumb to competition from younger leaner firms. Walmart did this to KMart, and KMart did it years ago to their competitors. Of the firms that made up the Dow Jones average 100 years ago, I think only one is still in existence today. My concern here is that the competition in this case comes from foreign companies not American companies. I don't think it bodes well for the future of America.

Maybe if America would quit making an inferior product this problem would stop.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: June 08, 2005, 04:39:37 PM »

A unionized plant in Detroit shutting down is just somehow bigger news than a non-Union plant in Alabama opening up.

But of course!  Because the former were 'good' jobs, and the latter much worse.
Logged
David S
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,250


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: June 08, 2005, 10:09:42 PM »

OK here's a question: If you were the CEO of GM what would you do to restore the company to profitability? Remember GM is not the US government. It cannot operate at a loss continuously. It must be profitable or go broke. What would you do?
Logged
phk
phknrocket1k
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,906


Political Matrix
E: 1.42, S: -1.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: June 08, 2005, 10:25:53 PM »

OK here's a question: If you were the CEO of GM what would you do to restore the company to profitability? Remember GM is not the US government. It cannot operate at a loss continuously. It must be profitable or go broke. What would you do?

Outsource all jobs to China and start a strategy of becoming a Chinese company with simply having an American brand-name.
Logged
Jake
dubya2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,621
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -0.90, S: -0.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: June 08, 2005, 10:30:42 PM »

If I owned any large unionized company I'd move to somewhere where I could get cheap labor instead of paying my workers' salary, health care, retirement, etc.
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: June 08, 2005, 11:36:47 PM »

phnkrocket, Jake, you are both correct!  The best solution to profitability/competition problems is to seek cheaper labor.  Lovely!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 12 queries.