Hail, Columbia! (The Election of 1876, Round 2)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 08:07:13 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Hail, Columbia! (The Election of 1876, Round 2)
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: For President of the Commonwealth of North America...
#1
Theodore Roosevelt of New York [Commonwealth Liberal]
 
#2
John C. Frémont of Sacramento [Democratic]
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 30

Author Topic: Hail, Columbia! (The Election of 1876, Round 2)  (Read 418 times)
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 16, 2016, 09:03:02 AM »
« edited: April 16, 2016, 10:31:44 AM by Cranberry »

If you look at vote totals, 1876 at first seemed like a return to the normal after the anomaly of 72: the Liberals back at a roof of support of about 45%, and the Whig vote encompassing the remaining 55% or more. Only this time, said majority Whig vote was split: the more pro-reform wing split off the main party and elected former Senator John Frémont to their standard-bearer, while more traditional Whigs stuck with Senator Thomas Bayard. This split in the Whig vote ensured for the incumbent President to score first in the first round, with Frémont a close second, ahead of Bayard. The main question in the second round will now be which candidate may energise his base of supporters best, and whether or not Frémont can persuade his former party colleagues to jump ship and opt for him as the lesser of two evils.

3 days

President Theodore Roosevelt of New York [Commonwealth Liberal]
The President is running for reelection on his popular reform agenda, promising further reforms in the event of a second term. He talks about public schooling and university reform, support for the Temperance movement and urban planning. Once again, Roosevelt runs a "front-porch" campaign based in the cities of Franklin and New York; while sending out surrogates to campaign for him in the further provinces.

Former Senator John C. Frémont of Sacramento [Democratic]
A respected elder statesman and former Senator from Sacrement, John Frémont is the ideal figure to lead a reformist break-away Whig faction. Influential not only in his home province, whose development he was heavily involved in, Frémont's platform includes support for many of Roosevelt's reforms, but warns cautiously of others. In traditional Whiggish fashion, he warns before the Temperance movement as a vehicle of anti-immigrant policies, and champions causes for the immigrants, largely among the working classes.
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2016, 10:43:59 AM »

Say no to Roosevelt's reform! If he really wanted what he says he does, why didn't he do it before now?
Logged
Mr. Smith
MormDem
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,173
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2016, 10:53:57 AM »

Re-elect the President.
Logged
PPT Spiral
Spiral
Atlas Politician
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,528
Bosnia and Herzegovina


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2016, 01:42:48 PM »

Logged
Zioneer
PioneerProgress
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,451
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 16, 2016, 03:26:45 PM »

I really like Fremont, but Roosevelt's been doing a good job, so I have to vote to re-elect him.
Logged
Intell
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,817
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: -6.71, S: -1.24

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 16, 2016, 07:50:05 PM »

Fremont.
Logged
Unconditional Surrender Truman
Harry S Truman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,142


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2016, 06:15:52 PM »

Impressive showing for Fremont.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2016, 06:44:16 PM »

It makes more sense for Roosevelt to win.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 18, 2016, 10:35:07 AM »

One day left here. Frémont is doing far better than expected, honestly.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2016, 12:35:14 PM »

I think it makes sense for Quebec to switch from the Liberals to the Democrats in this scenario. Quebec was by far the most anti-prohibition province in Canada historically.
Logged
Cranberry
TheCranberry
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,501
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 19, 2016, 08:00:44 AM »

While hard-pressed by his challenger Frémont, President Theodore Roosevelt was able to capture a second term in office, and in the second round even increase his majority to a full-fledged margin of thirteen percent. While the former made strong inroads in traditional Liberal provinces such as Quebec, which due to being heavily opposed to the temperance movement and other measures of reform being perceived as too anti-Catholic, and also won the votes of immigrant groups such as Germans, Italians or Irishmen by a strong margin; the Liberal strongholds in the Southwest and Northeast, coupled with low voter turnout in the Whig heartland of the Southeast, propelled the incumbent President to a second term in office. Vice President Iglesias was subsequently also reconfirmed by the Liberal-controlled congress.

President Theodore Roosevelt of New York [Commonwealth Liberal] - 56.7%
Former Senator John C. Frémont of Sacramento [Democratic] - 43.3%

Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2016, 04:00:16 PM »

We need a German in 1880. Did Bismarck's parents maybe move to America? Shocked
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.033 seconds with 13 queries.