UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 03:29:59 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  International Elections (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: UK parliamentary boundary review 2016-2018  (Read 10427 times)
parochial boy
parochial_boy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,117


Political Matrix
E: -8.38, S: -6.78

« on: August 06, 2016, 07:12:12 PM »

Are boundary changes likely to be as pro-Conservative as the ones that were ultimately rejected five years ago?

One of the major arguments behind the reform was the fact that, at the time, the boundaries generally benefitted Labour, as the urban seats tended to have fewer voters, and lower turnout, meaning it was relatively easier for Labour to win a majority.

However, post the wholesale loss of Scotland to the SNP, Labour no longer have this advantage, as it has lost 40+ seats that it would have once expected to win.

On the flip side, the "cleaning up" of registrations with the new registration system will have proportionately hit the number of voters in Labour areas harder. Meaning that the Tories could claim that Labour seats still have fewer voters that Tory ones on average.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 12 queries.