So, is it too early to start making the "wall of shame" for primary polls?

[Matty]

Anyone want to give out specific polls that NEED to be on the wall?

1) That Kansas poll
2) ARG WI
3) ARG Maryland- dems
4) Gravis in Kentucky and LA

Those pop up in my head immediately.

[This account no longer in use.]

Overtime, Alabama and Arkansas (if those were real).

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

The 'Mike Downs' poll that just came out of Indiana showing CRUZ +16 with a two-week polling period.

[IceSpear]

Most ARG, Gravis, and Overtime polls.

Honestly, there's been so many this cycle there's not even a point. Off the top of my head, that Iowa poll that showed Hillary up like 30 points. Every SC poll on the Dem side besides Clemson. All those TX polls that showed Cruz only barely leading Trump. The OK polls where Trump was crushing it. Every MI Dem poll. The list goes on...

[Young Conservative]

The 'Mike Downs' poll that just came out of Indiana showing CRUZ +16 with a two-week polling period.

Well we will see won't we

[Darthpi – Anti-Florida Activist]

The Brown University poll that had Trump only getting 38% in Rhode Island was pretty bad.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

Øptimus poll with Trump ahead in Wisconsin

[Boston Bread]

Mason-Dixon showing Clinton up 34 in MN.
Dan Jones showing Trump leading and Sanders+2 in ID.

[BundouYMB]

Keeping in mind that only a tiny fraction of voters are actually able to attend caucuses, I don't think polls for caucus states should go on the wall of shame. It's impossible to know whether Clinton had a 10 point lead among eligible voters in Kansas as that poll showed, the results of the caucus definitely don't prove she didn't, and as such it shouldn't go on the wall of shame.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

Um... DMR final poll? Not that the margins were massively off, but they were still knocked off their gold-standard

[This account no longer in use.]

Keeping in mind that only a tiny fraction of voters are actually able to attend caucuses, I don't think polls for caucus states should go on the wall of shame. It's impossible to know whether Clinton had a 10 point lead among eligible voters in Kansas as that poll showed, the results of the caucus definitely don't prove she didn't, and as such it shouldn't go on the wall of shame.

True, but that poll wasn't even led by Clinton. The poll was led by 'Undecided'. There's also the fact that the sample size was under 300.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Michigan Mitchell Research and Illinois Chicago Tribune for the Democrats.

[Wisconsin+17]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Holy ****. Cruzslide!