Has jfern raised your opinion of Hillary Clinton?

[they don't love you like i love you]

Yes. If your criticism of a candidate are that lame and you even have to resort to right wing talking points like that email crap now, you're kind of proving that they really aren't that bad.

[Boston Bread]

No, although it was fairly high to begin with.

[NeverAgain]

No, online posters opinions do not affect the way I think of things or people.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

[This account no longer in use.]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left.

Really, most of my criticisms are, while some are about ethical issues that are neither right nor left wing.

[dax00]

My detestation of the hag has been generally level since 2007. One can only suffer so many platitudes used to distract from her despicable character and history of corruption.

[Coolface Sock #42069]

As the first Republican to reply to this, yes, the amount of hate I've seen Hillary take from the left on this site has made me wonder if she'd really be that bad.

[DINGO Joe]

No impact, I've got that thing, what do you call it?  Perspective.

[Virginiá]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left.

Really, most of my criticisms are, while some are about ethical issues that are neither right nor left wing.

Yeah, we get it. Look, you shouldn't waste time in this thread. There are probably users on this forum saying nice things about Hillary right now, and they need to be corrected.

[This account no longer in use.]

Say, did you guys know that Hillary Clinton has no relation to Wall Street and Goldman Sachs whatsoever?

[they don't love you like i love you]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

Oh give me a break, I've listed specific reasons plenty of times for why she's so hawkish, and you can look at her husband's Presidency for no shortage of neoliberalism. The Clintons are DLC to the core; the DLC's records belong to the Clinton Foundation. I don't see you talking much about issues, just freaking nonsense.

[Eraserhead]

No change.

[MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!]

No, online posters opinions do not affect the way I think of things or people.

[they don't love you like i love you]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

Oh give me a break, I've listed specific reasons plenty of times for why she's so hawkish, and you can look at her husband's Presidency for no shortage of neoliberalism. The Clintons are DLC to the core; the DLC's records belong to the Clinton Foundation. I don't see you talking much about issues, just freaking nonsense.

Inb4 "b- b- but muh meritocracy"

Don't worry, her male picks will be equally bad.

Also in regards to her hawkishness: http://www.vox.com/2016/4/27/11504272/hillary-clinton-hawk

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

Come on, they are generally criticisms from the left. People claiming that any criticism of Hillary is right-wing has certainly lowered my opinion of Hillary supporters.

Your "criticism from the left" of her rarely rises above just "NEOLIBERAL CORPORATIST WARMONGER!" style ranting that's impossible to take seriously.

Oh give me a break, I've listed specific reasons plenty of times for why she's so hawkish, and you can look at her husband's Presidency for no shortage of neoliberalism. The Clintons are DLC to the core; the DLC's records belong to the Clinton Foundation. I don't see you talking much about issues, just freaking nonsense.

Inb4 "b- b- but muh meritocracy"

Don't worry, her male picks will be equally bad.

Also in regards to her hawkishness: http://www.vox.com/2016/4/27/11504272/hillary-clinton-hawk

The idea that Hillary is no more hawkish than Bernie is completely laughable. He voted against Iraq, Kyl-Lieberman, doesn't support the no fly zone where Russian planes are flying, and doesn't support regime change against Assad while he's fighting ISIS and Al Qaeda. Tulsi Gabbard endorsed Bernie because his Syria policy isn't idiotic.

And I'm sure I can find some posts of yours from 2008 saying she was a hawk when she had 8 years less of a record of being a hawk.

[they don't love you like i love you]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

[Virginiá]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

He probably just wanted to forge consensus on what kind of side effects your unrelenting propaganda and shilling are having on the kind users of Atlas.

[This account no longer in use.]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

Jfern, not every Sanders supporter has to support you as well. Accept that.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

He probably just wanted to forge consensus on what kind of side effects your unrelenting propaganda and shilling are having on the kind users of Atlas.

Why am I singled out for all the propaganda on this site?

[This account no longer in use.]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

He probably just wanted to forge consensus on what kind of side effects your unrelenting propaganda and shilling are having on the kind users of Atlas.

Why am I singled out for all the propaganda on this site?

Maybe because you spread a good part of it?

Besides, it's time to give up. Hillary Clinton is the presumptive nominee. Besides, even if Sanders did become president, you'd probably end up turning on him and calling him a moderate hero by a year from now.

[they don't love you like i love you]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

Because while I voted for Sanders you still have managed to improve my opinion of Hillary Clinton.

[○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└]

You know that I voted for Sanders right?

And yet you felt compelled to make this thread for some reason.

Because while I voted for Sanders you still have managed to improve my opinion of Hillary Clinton.

This board has some serious Hillary hacks who say lots of false things about Bernie, and yet you never posted a thread about any of them. This thread shows that you're a dumbass regardless of who you voted for.