What three states are likely to have the highest % of people not voting...
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2024, 02:11:11 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  What three states are likely to have the highest % of people not voting...
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ...for either Clinton or Trump in the general election?
#1
Alabama
 
#2
Alaska
 
#3
Arizona
 
#4
Arkansas
 
#5
California
 
#6
Colorado
 
#7
Connecticut
 
#8
Delaware
 
#9
Florida
 
#10
Georgia
 
#11
Hawaii
 
#12
Idaho
 
#13
Illinois
 
#14
Indiana
 
#15
Iowa
 
#16
Kansas
 
#17
Kentucky
 
#18
Louisiana
 
#19
Maine
 
#20
Maryland
 
#21
Massachusetts
 
#22
Michigan
 
#23
Minnesota
 
#24
Mississippi
 
#25
Missouri
 
#26
Montana
 
#27
Nebraska
 
#28
Nevada
 
#29
New Hampshire
 
#30
New Jersey
 
#31
New Mexico
 
#32
New York
 
#33
North Carolina
 
#34
North Dakota
 
#35
Ohio
 
#36
Oklahoma
 
#37
Oregon
 
#38
Pennsylvania
 
#39
Rhode Island
 
#40
South Carolina
 
#41
South Dakota
 
#42
Tennessee
 
#43
Texas
 
#44
Utah
 
#45
Vermont
 
#46
Virginia
 
#47
Washington
 
#48
West Virginia
 
#49
Wisconsin
 
#50
Wyoming
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 31

Calculate results by number of options selected
Author Topic: What three states are likely to have the highest % of people not voting...  (Read 529 times)
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 30, 2016, 02:08:11 PM »

Select three options. You can change your votes over time if you so desire. The poll will be open until a month before the general election.
Logged
IceSpear
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,840
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -6.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2016, 03:31:35 PM »

Utah, Vermont, Alaska
Logged
Xing
xingkerui
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,303
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.52, S: -3.91

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 30, 2016, 04:03:45 PM »

Alaska, Montana, and Utah.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,722


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2016, 04:06:54 PM »

Utah and Vermont seem like two of the most likely. Funny how they were the only two partisan Republican states in 1912.
Logged
nclib
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,304
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 30, 2016, 04:07:37 PM »

I voted UT, ME, and AK.

In 2012 it was AK NM OR.
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 30, 2016, 04:10:29 PM »

UT, AK, and NM (assuming Johnson is the Libertarian nominee - otherwise MT)
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,887
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 30, 2016, 04:21:24 PM »

UT, AK, and NM (assuming Johnson is the Libertarian nominee - otherwise MT)

Why New Mexico? Trump is going to drive Hispanic turnout through the roof, and considering that NM is majority-minority, I don't see how their turnout would be on the lower side of the spectrum. Unless I am missing something here that is specific to New Mexico?
Logged
Kingpoleon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,144
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 30, 2016, 05:14:55 PM »

Does this mean highest third party vote?

If so:
Alaska
New Hampshire
Minnesota
Logged
The Free North
CTRattlesnake
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,568
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2016, 05:52:05 PM »

The states with the highest hispanic populations...who traditionally have the lowest voter turnout of any major demographic group.

So: NM, CA, TX
Logged
Boston Bread
New Canadaland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,636
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -5.00, S: -5.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 30, 2016, 06:07:45 PM »

UT, AK, and NM (assuming Johnson is the Libertarian nominee - otherwise MT)

Why New Mexico? Trump is going to drive Hispanic turnout through the roof, and considering that NM is majority-minority, I don't see how their turnout would be on the lower side of the spectrum. Unless I am missing something here that is specific to New Mexico?
NM was Johnson's highest performance in 2012, and is his home state. Without Johnson as the nominee there is no reason for NM to have such a high third party vote.
Logged
Zuza
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 359
Russian Federation
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 30, 2016, 06:26:39 PM »

UT, AK, and NM (assuming Johnson is the Libertarian nominee - otherwise MT)

Why New Mexico? Trump is going to drive Hispanic turnout through the roof, and considering that NM is majority-minority, I don't see how their turnout would be on the lower side of the spectrum. Unless I am missing something here that is specific to New Mexico?

That depends on how you interpret "the highest % of people not voting for either Clinton or Trump in the general election". It could mean either a % of a total voting-age population, or a % of those who voted.
Logged
Virginiá
Virginia
Administratrix
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,887
Ukraine


Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -5.91

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 30, 2016, 06:30:09 PM »

Yes, you guys are right. I misinterpreted the thread title Sad
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 30, 2016, 09:41:22 PM »


I voted for the same three.

UT, AK, and NM (assuming Johnson is the Libertarian nominee - otherwise MT)

Why New Mexico? Trump is going to drive Hispanic turnout through the roof, and considering that NM is majority-minority, I don't see how their turnout would be on the lower side of the spectrum. Unless I am missing something here that is specific to New Mexico?

That depends on how you interpret "the highest % of people not voting for either Clinton or Trump in the general election". It could mean either a % of a total voting-age population, or a % of those who voted.

Just to clarify, I'm only talking about the % of those who actually vote. Sorry for the confusion.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,470
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: May 02, 2016, 12:48:18 AM »

Shameless bump for more votes.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 14 queries.