Are there results for County level Kansas, Piute or Beaver, UT, or Carroll, AK?

[Sorenroy]

Does anyone know if anyplace that has the results from this handful of places?

Edit: if you know both the Dems and Repubs that would be best, but if you only have on that's fine. Also, please give a link in your responce.

[Young Conservative]

Beaver, UT
Cruz: 63.1%
Trump: 23%
Kasich: 13.1%

[Sorenroy]

Beaver, UT
Cruz: 63.1%
Trump: 23%
Kasich: 13.1%

How about the Dems?

[Young Conservative]

I do not know the exact number, but Wikipedia has a county level map with Sanders winning every county in Utah, which seems about right

[Alcon]

These results are actually available on this site

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

If you go up to "Primary by Year" you can choose 2016 Democratic or 2016 Republican

Beaver UT was Sanders 24, Clinton 20 and Cruz 229, Trump 87, Kasich 47.  Low turnout because of the caucus system.

Piute UT was Sanders 2 (yes, that's it) and Cruz 86, Trump 70, Kasich 12.  Ditto.

I assume you mean Carroll County AR (Arkansas), in which case the GOP Primary vote was Trump 1555, Cruz 1119, Rubio 815, Carson 314, Kasich 207, Other 138.  The Democratic vote was Sanders 1109, Clinton 1069, Other 41.

[Sorenroy]

These results are actually available on this site

https://uselectionatlas.org/RESULTS/index.html

I know. It's just... well... I don't exactly trust this site to have the correct information. I know at least one of the primaries was put into the wrong catagory (in terms of it was a >60% rather than a >50% or something, I forget which state) and the 2012 general election numbers are not accurate either. I'll use the atlas's numbers if I need to, but I'd rather not.

[/]

Yeah, a lot of the info in the database is incorrect because some idiot keeps putting in information before the results finish reporting just so he can be the first one.

[Alcon]

There was a bug that caused the shading to screw up, which Dave fixed, but I don't think the results themselves have been incorrect?  Also, keep in mind that a lot of the "final" results we see aren't necessarily final for a while, as they account for provisional ballots and the like.  That means that preliminary results (the Atlas and elsewhere) should be checked with official sources if you want to be 100% sure they're actually final.  I haven't noticed the Atlas having more trouble with this than other sources.  In fact, the Atlas seems to do a better job of noting when results are unofficial.  Then again, your use may be more thorough than mine